Effects of stimulus order on discrimination processes in comparative and equality judgements: Data and models

References

• Alcalá-Quintana, R., & García-Pérez, M. A. (2011). A model for the time-order error in contrast discrimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1221–1248. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.540018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, L. G. (1977). The time-order error in judgments of duration. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 24–31. doi: 10.1037/h0081647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anton-Erxleben, K., Abrams, J., & Carrasco, M. (2010). Evaluating comparative and equality judgments in contrast perception: Attention alters appearance. Journal of Vision, 10(11), article 6. doi: 10.1167/10.11.6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anton-Erxleben, K., Abrams, J., Carrasco, M. (2011). Equality judgments cannot distinguish between attention effects on appearance and criterion: A reply to Schneider (2011). Journal of Vision, 11(13), article 8. doi: 10.1167/11.13.8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bausenhart, K. M., Dyjas, O., & Ulrich, R. (2013). Temporal reproductions are influenced by an internal reference: Explaining the Vierordt effect. Acta Psychologica. Advance online publication.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bausenhart, K. M., Dyjas, O., Vorberg, D. & Ulrich, R. (2012). Estimating discrimination performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks: Routines for MATLAB and R. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 1157–1174. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0207-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dorfman, D. D., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1990). Waveform moment analysis: Topographical analysis of nonrhythmic waveforms. In J. T. Cacioppo & L. G. Tassinary (Eds.), Principles of psychophysiology (pp. 661–707). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Droit-Volet, S., Wearden, J., & Delgado-Yonger, M. (2007). Short-term memory for time in children and adults: A behavioral study and a model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97, 246–264. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durchlach, N. I., & Braida, L. D. (1969). Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 46, 372–383. doi: 10.1121/1.1911699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyjas, O., Bausenhart, K. M., & Ulrich, R. (2012). Trial-by-trial updating of an internal reference in discrimination tasks: Evidence from effects of stimulus order and trial sequence. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1819–1841. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0362-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyjas, O., Bausenhart, K. M., & Ulrich, R. (2013). Effects of stimulus order on duration discrimination sensitivity are under attentional control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. Advance online publication.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisler, H., Eisler, A. D., & Hellström, Å. (2008). Psychophysical issues in the study of time perception. In S. Grondin (Ed.), Psychology of time (pp. 75–109). Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Falmagne, J.-C. (1985). Elements of psychophysical theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fechner, G. T. (1860). Elemente der Psychophysik [Elements of psychophysics]. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.
   Google Scholar
• Green, D. M. & Swets, J. A. (1966/1988). Signal detection theory and psychophysics (Rev. ed.). Los Altos, CA: Peninsula.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hellström, Å. (1977). Time errors are perceptual. Psychological Research, 39, 345–388. doi: 10.1007/BF00308933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellström, Å. (1978). Factors producing and factors not producing time errors: An experiment with loudness comparisons. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 433–444. doi: 10.3758/BF03204147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellström, Å. (1979). Time errors and differential sensation weighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 460–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellström, Å. (1985). The time-order error and its relatives: Mirrors of cognitive processes in comparing. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 35–61. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.97.1.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellström, Å. (2000). Sensation weighting in comparison and discrimination of heaviness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 6–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellström, Å. (2003). Comparison is not just subtraction: Effects of time- and space-order on subjective stimulus difference. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1161–1177. doi: 10.3758/BF03194842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellström, Å., & Rammsayer, T. H. (2004). Effects of time-order, interstimulus interval, and feedback in duration discrimination of noise bursts in the 50- and 1000-ms ranges. Acta Psychologica, 116, 1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helson, H. (1947). Adaptation-level as frame of reference for prediction of psychophysical data. The American Journal of Psychology, 60, 1–29. doi: 10.2307/1417326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, D. G., & Petrusic, W. M. (1975). Presentation order effects in duration discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 197–202. doi: 10.3758/BF03203886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, L. A. & Wearden, J. H. (2004). Double standards: Memory loading in temporal reference memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57B, 55–77. doi: 10.1080/02724990344000088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdom, F. A. A., & Prins, N. (2010). Psychophysics: a practical introduction. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Lages, M., & Treisman, M. (1998). Spatial frequency discrimination: Visual long-term memory or criterion setting? Vision Research, 38, 557–572. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)88333-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapid, E., Ulrich, R., & Rammsayer, T. (2008). On estimating the difference limen in duration discrimination tasks: A comparison of the 2AFC and the reminder task. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 291–305. doi: 10.3758/PP.70.2.291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michels, W. C., & Helson, H. (1954). A quantitative theory of time-order effects. The American Journal of Psychology, 67, 327–334. doi: 10.2307/1418635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, M., Dillenburger, B., Raphael, S., & Solomon, J. A. (2012). Observers can voluntarily shift their psychometric functions without losing sensitivity. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 185–193. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0222-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, M. J., Watamaniuk, S. N. J., & McKee, S. P. (2000). The use of an implicit standard for measuring discrimination thresholds. Vision Research, 40, 2341–2349. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00093-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachmias, J. (2006). The role of virtual standards in visual discrimination. Vision Research, 46, 2456–2464. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.01.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. S., & Jones, L. A. (2011). Modality effects in memory for basic stimulus attributes: A temporal and nontemporal comparison. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1354–1371. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.543324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patching, G. R., Englund, M. P., & Hellström, Å. (2012). Time- and space-order effects in timed discrimination of brightness and size of paired visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 915–940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00366
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rammsayer, T., & Wittkowski, K. M. (1990). Zeitfehler und Positionseffekt des Standardreizes bei der Diskrimination kurzer Zeitdauern [Time-order error and position effect of the standard stimulus in the discrimination of short durations]. Archiv für Psychologie, 142, 81–89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rattat, A.-C., & Picard, D. (2012). Short-term memory for auditory and visual durations: Evidence for selective interference effects. Psychological Research, 76, 32–40. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0326-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, H. E., & Gregory, R. L. (1964). Is the Weber fraction a function of physical or perceived input? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 116–122. doi: 10.1080/17470216408416356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, K. A. (2011). Attention alters decision criteria but not appearance: A reanalysis of Anton-Erxleben, Abrams, and Carrasco (2010). Journal of Vision, 11(13), article 7. doi: 10.1167/11.13.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, K. A. & Komlos, M. (2008). Attention biases decisions but does not alter appearance. Journal of Vision, 8(15), article 3. doi: 10.1167/8.15.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifried, T., & Ulrich, R. (2011). Exogenous visual attention prolongs perceived duration. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 68–85. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0005-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stott, L. H. (1935). Time-order errors in the discrimination of short tonal durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 741–766. doi: 10.1037/h0057714
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L. L. (1927a). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 273–286. doi: 10.1037/h0070288
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L. L. (1927b). Psychophysical analysis. The American Journal of Psychology, 38, 368–389. doi: 10.2307/1415006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, M. & Williams, T. C. (1984). A theory of criterion setting with an application to sequential dependencies. Psychological Review, 91, 68–111. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.91.1.68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukey, J. W. (1948). Approximate weights. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 19, 91–92. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177730297
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. (2010). DLs in reminder and 2AFC tasks: Data and models. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1179–1198. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.4.1179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R., & Vorberg, D. (2009). Estimating the difference limen in 2AFC tasks: Pitfalls and improved estimators. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1219–1227. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.6.1219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R., Wing, A. M., & Rinkenauer, G. (1995). Amplitude and duration scaling of brief isometric force pulses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1457–1472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valsecchi, M., Vescovi, M., & Turatto, M. (2010). Are the effects of attention on speed judgments genuinely perceptual? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 637–650. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.3.637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vierordt, K. (1868). Der Zeitsinn nach Versuchen [The time sense according to experiments]. Tübingen: Verlag der H. Laupp'schen Buchhandlung.
   Google Scholar
• Wearden, J. H., Edwards, H., Fakhri, M., & Percival, A. (1998). Why “sounds are judged longer than lights”: Application of a model of the internal clock in humans. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51B, 97–120.
   Google Scholar
• Woodrow, H. (1935). The effect of practice upon time-order errors in the comparison of temporal intervals. Psychological Review, 42, 127–152. doi: 10.1037/h0063696
   Google Scholar
• Woodworth, R. S. & Schlosberg, H. (1954). Experimental psychology (3rd ed.). London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Yeshurun, Y., Carrasco, M., & Maloney, L. T. (2008). Bias and sensitivity in two-interval forced choice procedures: Tests of the difference model. Vision Research, 48, 1837–1851. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar