SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English

REFERENCES

• Adelman, J. S., & Brown, G. D. (2008). Modeling lexical decision: The form of frequency and diversity effects. Psychological Review, 115(1), 214–227. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adelman, J. S., Brown, G. D. A., & Quesada, J. F. (2006). Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science, 17, 814–823. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01787.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnon, I., & Snider, N. (2010). More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(1), 67–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Filipovic Durdevic, D., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M. (2011). An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, 118, 438–481. doi: 10.1037/a0023851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., … Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459. doi: 10.3758/BF03193014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., Buchmeier, M., Conrad, M., Jacobs, A. M., Bölte, J., & Böhl, A. (2011). The word frequency effect: A review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German. Experimental Psychology, 58, 412–424. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & Cortese, M. J. (2011). Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 545–559. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.503374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & Diependaele, K. (2013). Dealing with zero word frequencies: A review of the existing rules of thumb and a suggestion for an evidence-based choice. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 422–430. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0270-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., & New, B. (2011). Assessing the usefulness of google books’ word frequencies for psycholinguistic research on word processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 27. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., New, B., & Keuleers, E. (2012). Adding part-of-speech information to the SUBTLEX-US word frequencies. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 991–997. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0190-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLOS ONE, 5, e10729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Children's Printed Word Database. Database of printed word frequencies as read by children aged between 5 & 9. Retrieved May 21, 2013, from http://www.essex.ac.uk/psychology/cpwd/
   Google Scholar
• Cuetos, F., Glez-Nosti, M., Barbon, A., & Brysbaert, M. (2011). SUBTLEX-ESP: Spanish word frequencies based on film subtitles. Psicologica, 32, 133–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitropoulou, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., Avilés, A., Corral, J., & Carreiras, M. (2010). Subtitle-based word frequencies as the best estimate of reading behavior: The case of Greek. Frontiers in Psychology, 1(218), 1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferrand, L., New, B., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., Bonin, P., Meot, A., … Pallier, C. (2010). The french lexicon project: Lexical decision data for 38,840 french words and 38,840 pseudowords. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 488–496. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.2.488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garside, R., & Smith, N. (1997). A hybrid grammatical tagger: CLAWS4. In R. Garside, G. Leech, & A. McEnery (Eds.), Corpus annotation: Linguistic information from computer text corpora (pp. 102--121). London: Longman
   Google Scholar
• Government United Kingdom (1988). Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/contents
   Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: A new frequency measure for Dutch words based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 643–650. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 287–304. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0118-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgarriff, A. (2006). BNC database and word frequency lists. Retrieved May 13, 2013, from http://www.kilgarriff.co.uk/bnc-readme.html
   Google Scholar
• Kučera, H., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., & Bertram, R. (2013). Moving spaces: Spelling alternation in english noun-noun compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 939–966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30 thousand english words. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 978–990. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster University Centre for Computer Corpus Research on Language (n.d.). CLAWS part-of-speech tagger for English. Retrieved May 17, 2013, from http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/claws/
   Google Scholar
• Lété, B., & Bonin, P. (2013). Does frequency trajectory influence word identification? A cross-task comparison. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(5), 973–1000. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.723725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masterson, J., Stuart, M., Dixon, M., & Lovejoy, S. (2010). Children's printed word database: Continuities and changes over time in children's early reading vocabulary. British Journal of Psychology, 101(2), 221–242. doi: 10.1348/000712608X371744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnen, G., Carroll, J., & Pearce, D. (2001). Applied morphological processing of English. Natural Language Engineering, 7(3), 207–223. doi: 10.1017/S1351324901002728
   Google Scholar
• Monsell, S., Doyle, M. C., & Haggard, P. N. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks – Where are they? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 43–71. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.118.1.43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1995). Roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(1), 116–133. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New, B., Brysbaert, M., Veronis, J., & Pallier, C. (2007). The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 661–677. doi: 10.1017/S014271640707035X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., Soares, A. P., & Comesaña, M. (2013). Contextual diversity is a main determinant of word identification times in young readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 37–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2011). Seeing a phrase “time and again” matters: The role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multiword sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 37(3), 776–784. doi: 10.1037/a0022531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Stanford Natural Language Processing Group (n.d.). Stanford Log-linear Part-Of-Speech Tagger. Retrieved May 17, 2013, from http://nlp.stanford.edu/downloads/tagger.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Toutanova, K., Klein, D., Manning, C. D., & Singer, Y. (2003). Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings of the 2003 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics on human language technology-volume 1 (pp. 173–180). Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Yap, M. J., Tan, S. E., Pexman, P. M., & Hargreaves, I. S. (2011). Is more always better? Effects of semantic richness on lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(4), 742–750. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0092-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar