The conceptual representation of number

REFERENCES

• Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berent, I., Pinker, S., Tzelgov, J., Bibi, U., & Goldfarb, L. (2005). Computation of semantic number from morphological information. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 342–358. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, K., & Miller, C. A. (1991). Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 45–93. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(91)90003-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Filik, R., Paterson, K. B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2004). Processing doubly quantified sentences: Evidence from eye movements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 953–959. doi: 10.3758/BF03196727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, M. & Pearlmutter, N. J. (2011). Hierarchy and scope of planning in subject-verb agreement production. Cognition, 118, 377–397. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giora, R. (2002). Literal vs. figurative language: Different or equal? Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 487–506. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00045-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, K. R., & Bock, K. (2005). Notional number agreement in english. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 689–695. doi: 10.3758/BF03196759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kamp, H., & Reyle, U. (1993). From discourse to logic introduction to model theoretic semantics of natural language, formal logic and discourse representation theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, E. L., Lord, M. W., Reese, T. W., & Volkmann, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number. American Journal of Psychology, 62, 498–525. doi: 10.2307/1418556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaup, B., Kelter, S., & Habel, C. (2002). Representing referents of plural expressions and resolving plural anaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 405–450. doi: 10.1080/01690960143000272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiner, H., Garrod, S., & Sturt, P. (2013). Number agreement in sentence comprehension: The relationship between grammatical and conceptual factors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 829–874. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2012.667567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krifka, M. (1989). Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, & P. van Emde Boas (Eds.), Semantics and contextual expression. Dordrecht: Foris Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtzman, H. S., & MacDonald, M. C. (1993). Resolution of quantifier scope ambiguities. Cognition, 48, 243–279. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90042-T
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moxey, L. M., Sanford, A. J., Sturt, P., & Morrow, L. I. (2004). Constrains on the formation of plural reference objects: The influence of role, conjunction, and type of description. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 346–364. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, K. B., Filik, R., & Liversedge, S. P. (2008). Competition during the processing of quantifier scope ambiguities: Evidence from eye movements during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 459–473. doi: 10.1080/17470210701255317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patson, N. D., & Ferreira, F. (2009). Conceptual plural information is used to guide early parsing decisions: Evidence from garden-path sentences with reciprocal verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 464–486. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patson, N. D., & Warren, T. (2010). Evidence for distributivity effects in comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 36, 782–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patson, N. D., & Warren, T. (2011). Building complex reference objects from dual sets. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 443–459. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patson, N. D., & Warren, T. (2013). Comparing the roles of referents and event structures in parsing preferences. Language and Cognitive Processes, (ahead-of-print), 1–16. doi:10.1080/01690965.2013.788197
   Google Scholar
• Pietroski, P., Lidz, J., Hunter, T., & Halberda, J. (2009). The meaning of most: Semantics, numerosity & psychology. Mind & Language, 24, 554–585. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2009.01374.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, T., & Zwaan, R. A. (2009). Processing of color words activates color representations. Cognition, 111, 383–389. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauerland, U., Anderssen, J., & Yatsushiro, J. (2005). The plural is semantically unmarked. In S. Kepser & M. Reis (Eds.), Linguistic evidence (pp. 413–434). Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Sauerland, U., & Elbourne, P. (2002). Total reconstruction, PF movement, and derivational order. Linguistic Inquiry, 33, 283–319. doi: 10.1162/002438902317406722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschmann, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzschild, R. (1996). Pluralities. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 153–156. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., & Garrett, M. F. (1996). Subject-verb agreement in Spanish and English: Differences in the role of conceptual constraints. Cognition, 61, 261–298. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00713-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., & Semenza, C. (1995). Constructing subject-verb agreement in speech: The role of semantic and morphological factors. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 186–215. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1995.1009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Hartsuiker, R. J., Jarema, G., & Kolk, H. H. J. (1996). One or more labels on the bottles? Notional concord in Dutch and French. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 407–442. doi: 10.1080/016909696387169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagers, M. W., Lau, E. F., & Phillips, C. (2009). Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 206–237. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13, 168–171. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar