Learning what from where: Effects of spatial regularity on nonspatial sequence learning and updating

REFERENCES

• Bonardi, C., Graham, S., Hall, G., & Mitchell, C. (2005). Acquired distinctiveness and equivalence in human discrimination learning: Evidence for an attentional process. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(1), 88–92. doi:10.3758/BF03196351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28–71. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cools, R., Clark, L., Owen, A. M., & Robbins, T. W. (2002). Defining the neural mechanisms of probabilistic reversal learning using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. The Journal of Neuroscience, 22(11), 4563–4567. Retrieved from http://www.jneurosci.org/content/22/11/4563.full
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danckert, J., Stöttinger, E., Quehl, N., & Anderson, B. (2012). Right hemisphere brain damage impairs strategy updating. Cerebral Cortex, 22(12), 2745–2760. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreisbach, G., & Haider, H. (2008). That's what task sets are for: Shielding against irrelevant information. Psychological Research, 72(4), 355–361. doi:10.1007/s00426-007-0131-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druker, M., & Anderson, B. (2010). Spatial probability aids visual stimulus discrimination. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4(63), 1–10. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaschler, R., & Frensch, P. A. (2007). Is information reduction an item-specific or an item-general process? International Journal of Psychology, 42(4), 218–228. doi:10.1080/00207590701396526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaschler, R., Frensch, P. A., Cohen, A., & Wenke, D. (2012). Implicit sequence learning based on instructed task set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1389–1407. doi:10.1037/a0028071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng, J. J., & Behrmann, M. (2002). Probability cuing of target location facilitates visual search implicitly in normal participants and patients with hemispatial neglect. Psychological Science, 13(6), 520–525. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, R. L. (2002). Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science, 13(5), 431–436. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grafton, S. T., Hazeltine, E., & Ivry, R. (1995). Functional mapping of sequence learning in normal humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(4), 497–510. doi:10.1162/jocn.1995.7.4.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, C., Benson, C., Kersten, D., & Schrater, P. (2010). Alterations in choice behavior by manipulations of world model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(37), 16401–16406. doi:10.1073/pnas.1001709107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2006). Optimal predictions in everyday cognition. Psychological Science, 17(9), 767–773. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01780.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider, H., & Frensch, P. A. (1996). The role of information reduction in skill acquisition. Cognitive Psychology, 30(3), 304–337. doi:10.1006/cogp.1996.0009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jueptner, M., Stephan, K., Frith, C., Brooks, D., Frackowiak, R., & Passingham, R. (1997a). Anatomy of motor learning. I. frontal cortex and attention to action. Journal of Neurophysiology, 77(3), 1313–1324. Retrieved from http://jn.physiology.org/content/77/3/1313.full
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jueptner, M., Frith, C., Brooks, D., Frackowiak, R., & Passingham, R. (1997b). Anatomy of motor learning. II. subcortical structures and learning by trial and error. Journal of Neurophysiology, 77(3), 1325–1337. Retrieved from http://jn.physiology.org/content/77/3/1325.full
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keele, S. W., Ivry, R., Mayr, U., Hazeltine, E., & Heuer, H. (2003). The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation. Psychological Review, 110(2), 316–339. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr, U. (1996). Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: Evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(2), 350–364. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.2.350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J., & Ulrich, R. (2003). Simple reaction time and statistical facilitation: A parallel grains model. Cognitive Psychology, 46(2), 101–151. doi:10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00517-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 134–140. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 1–32. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, J. W. (2009). Frontiers: Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 2(10), 1–8. doi:10.3389/neuro.11.010.2008
   Google Scholar
• Restle, F., & Brown, E. R. (1970). Serial pattern learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83(1p1), 120–125. doi:10.1037/h0028530.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, E., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2001). Aspects of sensory guidance in sequence learning. Experimental Brain Research, 137(3–4), 336–345. doi:10.1007/s002210000673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, E., Tormos, J., Maeda, F., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2001). The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during sequence learning is specific for spatial information. Cerebral Cortex, 11(7), 628–635. doi:10.1093/cercor/11.7.628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926–1928. doi:10.1126/science.274.5294.1926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(4), 606–621. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholl, B. J. (2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition, 80(1–2), 1–46. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00152-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception-London, 28(9), 1059–1074. doi:10.1068/p2952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(7), 261–267. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01080-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaqiri, A., & Anderson, B. (2012). Spatial probability cuing and right hemisphere damage. Brain and Cognition, 80(3), 352–360. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2012.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stöttinger, E., Filipowicz, A., Danckert, J., & Anderson, B. (in press). The effects of prior learned strategies on updating an opponent's strategy in the rock, paper, scissors game. Cognitive Science.
   Google Scholar
• Tenenbaum, J. B., Kemp, C., Griffiths, T. L., & Goodman, N. D. (2011). How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction. Science, 331(6022), 1279–1285. doi:10.1126/science.1192788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toni, I., Krams, M., Turner, R., & Passingham, R. E. (1998). The time course of changes during motor sequence learning: A whole-brain fMRI study. Neuroimage, 8(1), 50–61. doi:10.1006/nimg.1998.0349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk-Browne, N. B., Jungé, J. A., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). The automaticity of visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 134(4), 552–563. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walthew, C., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2006). Target location probability effects in visual search: An effect of sequential dependencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(5), 1294–1301. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.5.1294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willingham, D. B., Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(6), 1047–1060. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0 A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(2), 202–238. doi:10.3758/BF03200774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(6), 495–501. doi:10.1038/nrn1411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar