The locus of word frequency effects in skilled spelling-to-dictation

REFERENCES

• Adelman, J. S., Brown, G. D. A., & Quesada, J. F. (2006). Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science, 17, 814–823. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01787.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, J., Knobel, M., Finkbeiner, M., & Caramazza, A. (2007). The locus of the frequency effect in picture naming: When recognition is not enough. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1177–1182. doi: 10.3758/BF03193109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database. Philadelphia, PA: CD-ROM.
   Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? Journal of Memory & Language, 24, 89–106. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(85)90017-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonin, P., Barry, C., Méot, A., & Chalard, M. (2004). The influence of age of acquisition in word reading and other tasks: A never ending story? Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 456–476.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, K. (1996). Language production: Methods and methodologies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 395–421. doi: 10.3758/BF03214545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonin, P., Chalard, M., Méot, A., & Fayol, M. (2002). The determinants of spoken and written picture naming latencies. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 89–114. doi: 10.1348/000712602162463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonin, P., & Fayol, M. (2002). Frequency effects in the written and spoken production of homophonic picture names. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 289–313. doi: 10.1080/09541440143000078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonin, P., Fayol, M., & Chalard, M. (2001). Age of acquisition and word frequency in written picture naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 54A, 469–489. doi: 10.1080/713755968
   Google Scholar
• Bonin, P., Fayol, M., & Gombert, J.-E. (1998). An experimental study of lexical access in the writing and naming of isolated words. International Journal of Psychology, 33, 269–286. doi: 10.1080/002075998400312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonin, P., & Méot, A. (2002). Writing to dictation in real time in adults: What are the determinants of written latencies? In S. P. Shohov (Ed.), Advances in psychology research (Vol. 16, pp. 139–165). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bonin, P., Peereman, R., & Fayol, M. (2001). Do phonological codes constrain the selection of orthographic codes in written picture naming? Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 688–720. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. D. A., & Loosemore, R. P. W. (1994). Computational approaches to normal and impaired spelling. In G. D. A. Brown & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and application (pp. 319–336). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen Priva, U. (2010). Constructing typing-time corpora: A new way to answer old questions. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 43–48). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance (Vol. VI, pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Connine, C. M., Mullennix, J., Shernoff, E., & Yelen, J. (1990). Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1084–1096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortese, M., & Fugett, A. (2004). Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 384–387. doi: 10.3758/BF03195585
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dahan, D., & Magnuson, J. S. (2006). Spoken-word recognition. In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 249–283). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delattre, M., Bonin, P., & Barry, C. (2006). Written spelling to dictation: Sound-to-spelling regularity affects both writing latencies and durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1330–1340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dich, N. (2011). Individual differences in the size of orthographic effects in spoken word recognition: The role of listeners’ orthographic skills. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 169–186. doi: 10.1017/S0142716410000330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I. & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627–635. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80042-8
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. R., Larochelle, S., & Grudin, J. (1988). Lexical, sublexical, and peripheral effects in skilled typewriting. Cognitive Psychology, 20(4), 524–548. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(88)90015-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, W. D., Suárez, L., Yap, M. J., & Tan, S. H. (2009). Distributional analyses in auditory lexical decision: Neighborhood density and word-frequency effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 882–887. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton, G., & Zorzi, M. (2003). Normal and impaired spelling in a connectionist dual-route architecture. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 115–162. doi: 10.1080/02643290242000871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W. (1991). Word frequency during copytyping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 478–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusczyk, P. W., & Luce, P. A. (2002). Speech perception and spoken word recognition: past and present. Ear and Hearing, 23, 2–40. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200202000-00002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler, D. J., & James, G. (2009). Probability matching in choice under uncertainty: intuition versus deliberation. Cognition, 113(1), 123–127. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiner, D. S. (1996). Effects of word familiarity and phoneme-grapheme polygraphy on oral spelling time and accuracy. The Psychological Record, 46, 49–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucera, H., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, E., Alamargot, D., Larocque, D., & Caporossi, G. (2011). Dynamics of the spelling process during a copy task: Effects of regularity and frequency. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 65(3), 141–150. doi: 10.1037/a0022538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (2002). Picture naming and word frequency: Comments on Alario, Costa, and Caramazza. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 299–321. doi: 10.1080/01690960143000443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1990). Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistics and computational perspectives (pp. 148–172). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massaro, D. W., & Lucas, P. A. (1984). Typing letter strings varying in orthographic structure. Acta Psychologica, 57, 109–131. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(84)90038-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRae, K., Jared, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). On the roles of frequency and lexical access in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 43–65. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(90)90009-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsell, S., Doyle, M. C., Haggard, P. N. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 43–71. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.118.1.43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perre, L., Pattamdilok, C., Montant, M., & Ziegler, J. C. (2009). Orthographic effects in spoken language: On-line activation or phonological restructuring? Brain Research, 1275, 73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.04.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B. (2005). The relationship between treatment outcomes and the underlying cognitive deficit: Evidence from the remediation of acquired dysgraphia. Aphasiology, 19, 994–1008. doi: 10.1080/02687030544000209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., & Dufor, O. (2011). The Neurotopography of written word production: An fMRI investigation of the distribution of sensitivity to length and frequency. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 4067–4081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, G. R., Bradley, D. C., & Forster, K. I. (1990). Word frequency and the pronunciation task: The contribution of articulatory fluency. Language & Cognitive Processes, 5, 203–236. doi: 10.1080/01690969008402105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime user‘s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Schock, J., Cortese, M. J., & Khanna, M. M. (2012). Imageability estimates for 3,000 disyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 374–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., Damian, M. F., Perez, M. A., Bowers, J. S., & Marin, J. (2009). Name-picture verification as a control measure for object naming: A task analysis and norms for a large set of pictures. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1581–1597. doi: 10.1080/17470210802511139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II: Proceedings from a symposium on attention and performance. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315 [special issue].
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S. (2001). Separate modifiability, mental modules, and the use of pure and composite measures to reveal them. Acta Psychologica, 106, 147–246. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00045-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L., & Wright, C. E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typing. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 117–152). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S., Wright, C. E., Monsell, S., & Knoll, R. L. (1980). Motor programs in rapid speech: Additional evidence. In R. A. Cole (Ed.), The perception and production of fluent speech (pp. 507–534). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Suárez, L., Tan, S. H., Yap, M. J., & Goh, W. D. (2011). Observing neighbourhood effects without neighbours. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 605–611. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0078-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tainturier, M. J., & Rapp, B. (2001). The spelling process. In B. Rapp (Ed.), What deficits reveal about the human mind/brain: A handbook of cognitive neuropsychology (pp. 263–289). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in spoken word perception. Psychological Science, 9, 325–329. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T., Balota, D. A., & Yap, M. J. (2008). Beyond Coltheart's N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 971–979.
   Google Scholar
• Weingarten, R., Nottbusch, G., & Will, U. (2004). Morphemes, syllables, and graphemes in written word production. In T. Pechmann & C. Habel (Eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to language production (pp. 529–572). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Will, U., Nottbusch, G., & Weingarten, R. (2006). Linguistic units in word typing: Effects of word presentation modes and typing delay. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 153–176. doi: 10.1075/wll.9.1.10wil
   Google Scholar
• Wurm, L. H., & Seaman, S. R. (2008). Semantic effects in naming and perceptual identification, but not in delayed naming: Implications for models and tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 381–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Petrova, A., & Ferrand, L. (2008). Feedback consistency effects in visual and auditory word recognition: Where do we stand after more than a decade? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 643–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar