Working memory affects older adults’ use of context in spoken-word recognition

REFERENCES

• Akeroyd, M. A. (2008). Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults. International Journal of Audiology, 47(Suppl. 2), S53–S71. doi:10.1080/14992020802301142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73, 247–264. doi: 10.1016%2FS0010-0277%2899%2900059-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andringa, S., Olsthoorn, N., van Beuningen, C., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. (2012). Determinants of success in native and non-native listening comprehension: An individual differences approach. Language Learning, 62(Suppl. 2), 49–78. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00706.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assmann, P. F., & Summerfield, Q. (1990). Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: Vowels with different fundamental frequencies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 680–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydelott, J., Leech, R., & Crinion, J. (2010). Normal adult aging and the contextual influences affecting speech and meaningful sound perception. Trends in Amplification, 14, 218–232. doi: 10.1177%2F1084713810393751
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Tweedie, F. J., & Schreuder, R. (2002). The subjects as a simple random effect fallacy: Subject variability and morphological family effects in the mental lexicon. Brain and Language, 81, 55–65. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2506
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. (1996). Exploring the central executive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 49A, 5–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benichov, J., Cox, L. C., Tun, P. A., & Wingfield, A. (2012). Word recognition within a linguistic context: Effects of age, hearing Acuity, verbal ability, and cognitive function. Ear & Hearing, 33, 250–256. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822f680f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilger, R. C., Nuetzel, J. M., Rabinowitz, W. M., & Rzeczkowski, C. (1984). Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 32–48. doi: 10.1121%2F1.2017541
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boulenger, V., Hoen, M., Ferragne, E., Pellegrino, F., & Meunier, F. (2010). Real-time lexical competitions during speech-in-speech comprehension. Speech Communication, 52, 246–253. doi: 10.1016%2Fj.specom.2009.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sounds. London, England: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brokx, J. P. L., & Nooteboom, S. G. (1982). Intonation and the perceptual separation of simultaneous voices. Journal of Phonetics, 10, 23–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, S., Van Engen, K. J., Calandruccio, L., & Bradlow, A. R. (2012). Linguistic contributions to speech-on-speech masking for native and non-native listeners: Language familiarity and semantic content. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131, 1449–1464. doi: 10.1121%2F1.3675943
   Google Scholar
• Brungart, D. S. (2001). Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 1101–1109. doi: 10.1121%2F1.1345696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brungart, D. S., & Simpson, B. D. (2002). The effects of spatial separation in distance on the informational and energetic masking of a nearby speech signal. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 664–676. doi: 10.1121%2F1.1490592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brungart, D. S., & Simpson, B. D. (2004). Within-ear and across-ear interference in a dichotic cocktail party listening task: Effects of masker uncertainty. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 301–310. doi: 10.1121%2F1.1628683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brungart, D. S., & Simpson, B. D. (2007). Effect of target-masker similarity on across-ear interference in a dichotic cocktail-party listening task. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122, 1724–1734. doi: 10.1121%2F1.2756797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner, H., & Pisoni, D. B. (1982). Some effects of perceptual load on spoken comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 186–195. doi: 10.1016%2FS0022-5371%2882%2990551-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Connine, C. M., & Titone, D. (1996). Phoneme monitoring. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 635–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, M. (2006). A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1562–1573. doi: 10.1121%2F1.2166600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Oxford Psychology Series, No. 26. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Segui, J. (1987). Phoneme identification and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 141–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1979). Monitoring sentence comprehension. In W. E. Cooper & E. T. C. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 113–134). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• DeLong, K., Urbach, T., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1117–1121. doi:10.1038/nn1504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubno, J. R., Ahlstrom, J. B., & Horwitz, A. R. (2000). Use of context by young and aged adults with normal hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 538–546. doi: 10.1121%2F1.428322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). Monitoring the lexicon with normal and compressed speech: Frequency effects and the prelexical code. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 316–335. doi: 10.1016%2F0749-596X%2890%2990003-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimas, P. D., & Nygaard, L. C. (1992). Contextual coherence and attention in phoneme monitoring. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 375–395. doi: 10.1016%2F0749-596X%2892%2990019-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143–149. doi: 10.3758%2FBF03203267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezzatian, P., Li, L., Pichora-Fuller, K., & Schneider, B. (2011). The effect of priming on release from informational masking is equivalent for younger and older adults. Ear and Hearing, 32, 84–96. doi: 10.1097%2FAUD.0b013e3181ee6b8a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, J., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2003). Attentional mechanisms. In M. J. Aminoff & R. B. Daroff (Eds.), Encyclopedia of neurological sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 292–299). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (2005). Aging in context: Age-related changes in context use during language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 42, 133–141. doi: 10.1111%2Fj.1469-8986.2005.00274.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., Kutas, M., & Schul, R. (2010). Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension. Brain and Language, 115, 149–161. doi: 10.1016%2Fj.bandl.2010.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., McLennan, D. B., De Ochoa, E., & Kutas, M. (2002). The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 39, 133–146. doi: 10.1017.S004857720139203X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferretti, T., McRae, K., & Hatherell, A. (2001). Integrating verbs, situation schemas, and thematic role concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 516–547. doi: 10.1006%2Fjmla.2000.2728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, J. M., Woodward, S. H., Sullivan, E. V., Isaacks, B. G., Tinklenberg, J. R., Yesavage, J. A., & Roth, W. T. (1996). N400 evidence of abnormal responses to speech in Alzheimer's disease. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 235–246. doi: 10.1016%2F0013-4694%2896%2995049-X
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foss, D. J., & Blank, M. A. (1980). Identifying the speech codes. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 1–31. doi: 10.1016%2F0010-0285%2880%2990002-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, D. J., & Jenkins, C. M. (1973). Some effects of context on the comprehension of ambiguous sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 577–589. doi: 10.1016%2FS0022-5371%2873%2980037-4
   Google Scholar
• Francis, A. L., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2009). Effects of intelligibility on working memory demand for speech perception. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 71, 1360–1374. doi: 10.3758%2FAPP.71.6.1360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyman, R. L., Balakrishnan, U., & Helfer, K. S. (2004). Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 2246–2256. doi: 10.1121%2F1.1689343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisina, D. R., & Frisina, R. D. (1997). Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: Relations to possible neural mechanisms. Hearing Research, 106, 95–104. doi: 10.1016%2FS0378-5955%2897%2900006-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia Lecumberri, M. L., & Cooke, M. P. (2006). Effect of masker type on native and non-native consonant perception in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 2445–2454. doi:10.1121/1.2180210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant, S., & Fitzgibbons, P. J. (1997). Selected cognitive factors and speech recognition performance among young and elderly listeners. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 423–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant, S., Frisina, R. D., Popper, A., & Fay, D. (Eds.). (2010). The aging auditory system: Perceptual characterization and neural bases of presbycusis. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hazenberg, S., & Hulstijn, J. H. (1996). Defining a minimal receptive second-language vocabulary for non-native university students: An empirical investigation. Applied Linguistics, 17, 145–163. doi: 10.1093%2Fapplin%2F17.2.145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfer, K. S., & Freyman, R. L. (2008). Aging and speech-on-speech masking. Ear and Hearing, 29, 87–98. doi: 10.1097%2FAUD.0b013e31815d638b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., Huang, Q., Chen, X., Qu, T. S., Wu, X. H., & Li, L. (2008). Perceptual integration between target speech and target-speech reflection reduces masking for target-speech recognition in younger adults and older adults. Hearing Research, 244, 51–65. doi: 10.1016%2Fj.heares.2008.07.006
   Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., & Janse, E. (2012). Anticipatory eye movements are modulated by working memory capacity: Evidence from older adults. Poster presented at the 18th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP 2012), Riva del Garda, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, H. M., & Moore, B. C. J. (2013). Contribution of temporal fine structure information and fundamental frequency separation to intelligibility in a competing-speaker paradigm. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133, 2421–2430. doi:10.1121/1.4792153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446. doi: 10.1016%2Fj.jml.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janse, E. (2012). A non-auditory measure of interference predicts distraction by competing speech in older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 19, 741–758. doi:10.1080/13825585.2011.652590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janse, E., & Adank, P. (2012). Predicting foreign-accent adaptation in older adults. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1563–1585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jesse, A., & Janse, E. (2012). Audiovisual benefit for recognition of speech presented with single-talker noise in older listeners. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 1167–1191. doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.620335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalikow, D. N., Stevens, K. N., & Elliott, L. L. (1977). Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 1337–1351. doi: 10.1121%2F1.381436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, G., Jr, Mason, C. R., Richards, V. M., Gallun, F. J., & Durlach, N. I. (2008). Informational masking. In W. A. Yost, A. N. Popper, & R. R. Fay (Eds.), Auditory perception of sound sources (pp. 143–190). New York: Springer Science + Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Knoeferle, P., & Crocker, M. W. (2007). The influence of recent scene events on spoken comprehension: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 519–543. doi: 10.1016%2Fj.jml.2007.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koelewijn, T., Zekveld, A. A., Festen, J. M., & Kramer, S. E. (2012). Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker. Ear and Hearing, 33, 291–300. doi: 10.1097%2FAUD.0b013e3182310019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahar, C. J., Tun, P. A., & Wingfield, A. (2004). Sentence-final word completion norms for young, middle-aged, and older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 59B, 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Lash, A., Rogers, C. S., Zoller, A., & Wingfield, A. (2013). Expectation and entropy in spoken word recognition: Effects of age and hearing acuity. Experimental Aging Research, 39, 235–253. doi:10.1080/0361073X.2013.779175
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Differential age effects on lexical ambiguity resolution mechanisms. Psychophysiology, 48, 960–972. doi: 10.1111%2Fj.1469-8986.2010.01158.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovelace, E. A., & Coon, V. E. (1991). Aging and word finding: Reverse vocabulary and cloze tests. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 33–35.
   Google Scholar
• Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8, 1–71. doi: 10.1016%2F0010-0277%2880%2990015-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, D. P., Roediger, H. L., McDaniel, M. A., Balota, D. A., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2010). The relationship between working memory capacity and executive functioning: Evidence for a common executive attention construct. Neuropsychology, 24, 222–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, S. L., Tun, P. A., Cox, C. L., Colangelo, M., Stewart, R. A. & Wingfield, A. (2005). Hearing loss and perceptual effort: Downstream effects on older adults’ memory for speech. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (A), 58, 22–33. doi: 10.1080%2F02724980443000151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227–234. doi: 10.1037%2Fh0031564
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mirman, D., McClelland, J. L., Holt, L. L., & Magnuson, J. S. (2008). Effects of attention on the strength of lexical influences on speech perception: Behavioral experiments and computational mechanisms. Cognitive Science, 32, 398–417. doi:10.1080/03640210701864063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., & Howerter, A. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neubauer, A. C., & Fink, A. (2009). Intelligence and neural efficiency. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 1004–1023. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nittrouer, S., & Boothroyd, A. (1990). Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 2705–2715. doi: 10.1121%2F1.399061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otten, M., & van Berkum, J. J. A. (2009). Does working memory capacity affect the ability to predict upcoming words in discourse? Brain Research, 1291, 92–101.
   Google Scholar
• Park, D. C., Lautenschlager, G., Hedden, T., Davidson, N. S., Smith, A. D., & Smith, P. K. (2002). Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging, 17, 299–320. doi: 10.1037%2F%2F0882-7974.17.2.299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peelle, J. E., Troiani, V., Wingfield, A., & Grossman, M. (2010). Neural processing during older adults’ comprehension of spoken sentences: Age differences in resource allocation and connectivity. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 773–782. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Schneider, B. A., & Daneman, M. (1995). How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 593–608. doi: 10.1121%2F1.412282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Schneider, B. A., MacDonald, E., Pass, H. E., & Brown, S. (2007). Temporal jitter disrupts speech intelligibility: A simulation of auditory aging. Hearing Research, 223, 114–121. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2006.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquado, T., Isaacowitz, D., & Wingfield, A. (2010). Pupillometry as a measure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults. Psychophysiology, 47, 560–569. doi: 10.1111%2Fj.1469-8986.2009.00947.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack, I. (1975). Auditory informational masking. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 57(Suppl. 1), 5. doi:10.1121%2F1.1995329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention systems of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabbitt, P. M. (1968). Channel-capacity, intelligibility and immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 241–248. doi: 10.1080%2F14640746808400158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revill, K. P., & Spieler, D. H. (2012). The effect of lexical frequency on spoken word recognition in young and older listeners. Psychology and Aging, 27, 80–87. doi:10.1037/a0024113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. S., Jacoby, L. L., & Sommers, M. S. (2012). Frequent false hearing by older adults: The role of age differences in metacognition. Psychology and Aging, 27, 33–45. doi: 10.1037%2Fa0026231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, J. (2003). Cognition in the hearing impaired and deaf as a bridge between signal and dialogue: A framework and a model. International Journal of Audiology, 42, 68–76. doi: 10.3109%2F1499202030 9074626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, J., Rudner, M., Foo, C., & Lunner, T. (2008). Cognition counts: A working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU). International Journal of Audiology, 47(Suppl. 2), S99–S105. doi: 10.1080%2F14992020802301167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quené, H., & van den Bergh, H. (2008). Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 413–425. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428. doi: 10.1037%2F%2F0033-295X.103.3.403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B. A., Daneman, M., Murphy, D. R., & Kwong See, S. (2000). Listening to discouse in distracting settings: The effects of aging. Psychology and Aging, 15, 110–125. doi: 10.1037%2F%2F0882-7974.15.1.110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, S., Pichora-Fuller, M. K., & Schneider, B. A. (2008). Priming and sentence context support listening to noise-vocoded speech by younger and older adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123, 489–499. doi: 10.1121%2F1.2783762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. L., Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Wilson, R. H., & MacDonald, E. N. (2012). Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: The effects of age and hearing loss. Ear and Hearing, 33, 349–366. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e318242571c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers, M. S., & Danielson, S. M. (1999). Inhibitory processes and spoken word recognition in young and older adults: The interaction of lexical competition and semantic context. Psychology and Aging, 14, 458–472. doi: 10.1037%2F%2F0882-7974.14.3.458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tun, P. A., McCoy, S., & Wingfield, A. (2009). Aging, hearing acuity, and the attentional costs of effortful listening. Psychology and Aging, 24, 761–766. doi: 10.1037%2Fa0014802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tun, P. A., O'Kane, G., & Wingfield, A. (2002). Distraction by competing speech in young and older adult listeners. Psychology and Aging, 17, 453–467. doi:10.1037%2F%2F0882-7974.17.3.453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Engen, K. J., & Bradlow, A. R. (2007). Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121, 519–526. doi: 10.1121%2F1.2400666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhaeghen, P. (2003). Aging and vocabulary score: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18, 332–339. doi: /10.1037%2F0882-7974.18.2.332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, C. S. (2005). Some comments on informational masking. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 91, 502–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2004). Wechsler adult intelligence test ( Dutch version, 3rd ed.). Amsterdam: Harcourt Test Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A., Alexander, A. H., & Cavigelli, S. (1994). Does memory constrain utilization of top-down information in spoken word recognition? Evidence from normal aging. Language and Speech, 37, 221–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A. A., Kramer, S. E., Festen, J. M. (2010). Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: The influence of sentence intelligibility. Ear and Hearing, 31, 480–490. doi: 10.1097%2FAUD.0b013e3181d4f251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A. A., Kramer, S. E., Festen, J. M. (2011a). Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: The influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response. Ear and Hearing, 32, 498–510. doi: 10.1097%2FAUD.0b013e31820 512bb
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A. A., Rudner, M., Johnsrude, I. S., Festen, J. M., van Beek, J. H. M., & Rönnberg, J. (2011b). The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise. Ear and Hearing, 32, 16–25. doi: 10.1097%2FAUD.0b013e318228036a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A. A., Rudner, M., Johnsrude, I. S., Heslenfeld, D. J., & Rönnberg, J. (2012). Behavioral and fMRI evidence that cognitive ability modulates the effect of semantic context on speech intelligibility. Brain and Language, 122, 103–113. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2012.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar