About the unidirectionality of interference: Insight from the musical Stroop effect

REFERENCES

• Akiva-Kabiri, L., & Henik, A. (2012). A unique asymmetrical stroop effect in absolute pitch possessors. Experimental Psychology, 59(5), 272–278. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, C., & Besner, D. (2006). Reverse stroop effects with untranslated responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(6), 1345–1353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, C., & Besner, D. (2007). A reverse Stroop effect without translation or reading difficulty. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(3), 466–469. doi: 10.3758/BF03194090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97(3), 332–361. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulaney, C. L., & Rogers, W. A. (1994). Mechanisms underlying reduction in Stroop interference with practice for young and old adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(2), 470–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, K., & MacLeod, C. M. (1984). A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(5), 622–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durgin, F. H. (2003). Translation and competition among internal representations in a reverse Stroop effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(3), 367–378. doi: 10.3758/BF03194568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. R., Woodley-Zanthos, P., Dulaney, C. L., & Palmer, R. L. (1989). Automatic-effortful processing and cognitive inertia in persons with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 93(4), 412–423.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flowers, J. H., Warner, J. L., & Polansky, M. L. (1979). Response and encoding factors in “ignoring” irrelevant information. Memory & Cognition, 7(2), 86–94. doi: 10.3758/BF03197589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, M. O., & Glaser, W. R. (1982). Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8(6), 875–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, W. R., & Düngelhoff, F. J. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(5), 640–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grégoire, L., Perruchet, P., & Poulin-Charronnat, B. (2013). The musical Stroop effect: Opening a new avenue to research on automatisms. Experimental Psychology, 60(4), 269–278. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grégoire, L., Perrcuhet, P., & Poulin-Charronnat, B. (2014). Is the musical Stroop effect able to keep its promises? A reply to Akiva-Kabirai and Henik (2014), Gast (2014), Moeller and Frings (2014), and Zakay (2014). Experimental Psychology, 61(1), 80–83.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D. (1980). Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data. Cognitive Psychology, 12(4), 523–553. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90019-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D., & Klapp, S. T. (1991). Automatizing alphabet arithmetic: I. Is Extended practice necessary to produce automaticity?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(2), 179–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, D. G., & Mitterer, J. O. (1982). Selective and divided attention in a Stroop task. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36(4), 684–700. doi: 10.1037/h0080661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163–203. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, C. M. (1998). Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: The progression of interference and facilitation. Memory & Cognition, 26(2), 201–211. doi: 10.3758/BF03201133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, C. M., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(1), 126–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, C. M., & MacDonald, P. A. (2000). Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: Uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(10), 383–391. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01530-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melara, R. D., & Algom, D. (2003). Driven by information: A tectonic theory of Stroop effects. Psychological Review, 110(3), 422–471. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melara, R. D., & Mounts, J. R. (1993). Selective attention to Stroop dimensions: Effects of baseline discriminability, response mode, and practice. Memory & Cognition, 21(5), 627–645. doi: 10.3758/BF03197195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palef, S. R., & Olson, D. R. (1975). Spatial and verbal rivalry in a Stroop-like task. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 29(3), 201–209. doi: 10.1037/h0082026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perruchet, P., & Poulin-Charronnat, B. (2012). Word segmentation: Trading the (new, but poor) concept of statistical computation for the (old, but richer) associative approach. In P. Rebuschat & J. N. Williams (Eds.), Statistical learning and language acquisition (pp. 119–143). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J., Lanier, L. H., & Walker, H. M. (1925). Comparisons of white and negro children in certain ingenuity and speed tests. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 5, 271–283. doi: 10.1037/h0074452
   Google Scholar
• Protopapas, A., Archonti, A., & Skaloumbakas, C. (2007). Reading ability is negatively related to Stroop interference. Cognitive Psychology, 54(3), 251–282. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446–461. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rescorla, R. A. (1968). Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 66, 1–5. doi: 10.1037/h0025984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249–284. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00027-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 110(1), 88–125. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2005). The visual-auditory color-word stroop asymmetry and its time course. Memory & Cognition, 33(8), 1325–1336. doi: 10.3758/BF03193365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2008). Tracing attention and the activation flow in spoken word planning using eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(2), 353–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84(1), 1–66. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84(2), 127–190. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, L., Walsh, V., & Frith, U. (2004). Reading music modifies spatial mappings in pianists. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(2), 183–195. doi: 10.3758/BF03194871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643–662. doi: 10.1037/h0054651
   Google Scholar
• Verdonschot, R. G., La Heij, W., & Schiller, N. O. (2010). Semantic context effects when naming Japanese kanji, but not Chinese hànzì. Cognition, 115, 512–518. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virzi, R. A., & Egeth, H. E. (1985). Toward a translational model of Stroop interference. Memory & Cognition, 13(4), 304–319. doi: 10.3758/BF03202499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakay, D., & Glicksohn, J. (1985). Stimulus congruity and S-R compatibility as determinants of interference in a Stroop-like task. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 39(3), 414–423. doi: 10.1037/h0080069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar