Examining the lag effect under incidental encoding: Contributions of semantic priming and reminding

REFERENCES

• Balota, D. A., Duchek, J. M., & Paullin, R. (1989). Age-related differences in the impact of spacing, lag and retention interval. Psychology and Aging, 4, 3–9. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.4.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, A. S., & Tullis, J. G. (2010). What makes distributed practice effective? Cognitive Psychology, 61, 228–247. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bui, D. C., Maddox, G. B., & Balota, D. A. (2013). The roles of working memory and intervening task difficulty in determining the benefits of repetition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 341–347. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0352-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory and Cognition, 20, 633–642. doi: 10.3758/BF03202713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354–380. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Challis, B. H. (1993). Spacing effects on cued-memory tests depend on level of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 389–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Challis, B. H., & Brodbeck, D. R. (1992). Level of processing affects priming in word fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 595–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coane, J. H., & Balota, D. A. (2010). Repetition priming across distinct contexts: Effects of lexical status, word frequency, and retrieval test. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2376–2398. doi: 10.1080/17470211003687546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowder, R. G. (1976). Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, G. (2013). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 27, 7–29.
   Google Scholar
• Delaney, P. F., & Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L. (2009). Rehearsal strategies can enlarge or diminish the spacing effect: Pure versus mixed lists and encoding strategy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 35, 1148–1161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney, P. F., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., & Spirgel, A. (2010). Spacing and testing effects: A deeply critical, lengthy, and at times discursive review of the literature. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 53, 63–147. doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(10)53003-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster, F. N. (1996). Distributing and managing the conditions of encoding and practice. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory (pp. 317–344). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Uber das Gedachtnis. New York: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Estes, W. K. (1955a). Statistical theory of distributional phenomena in learning. Psychological Review, 62, 369–377.
   Google Scholar
• Estes, W. K. (1955b). Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regression. Psychological Review, 62, 145–154. doi: 10.1037/h0048509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M. (1976). Monotonic and nonmonotonic lag effects in paired-associate and recognition memory paradigms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 1–16. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(76)90002-5
   Google Scholar
• Greene, R. L. (1989). Spacing effects in memory: Evidence for a two process account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 371–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintzman, D. L. (2004). Judgment of frequency versus recognition confidence: Repetition and recursive reminding. Memory & Cognition, 32, 336–350. doi: 10.3758/BF03196863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintzman, D. L. (2008). Recursive reminding and children's concepts of numbers. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(6), 656–657. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X08005724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintzman, D. L. (2010). How does repetition affect memory? Evidence from judgments of recency. Memory & Cognition, 38, 102–115. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.1.102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintzman, D. L. (2011). Research strategy in the study of memory: Fads, fallacies, and the search for the “coordinates of truth. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 253–271. doi: 10.1177/1745691611406924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L. (1978). On interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 649–667. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90393-6
   Google Scholar
• Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2006). Repeated retrieval during learning is key to long-term retention. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 151–162. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 1–23. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, D. C., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80016-9
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, L. R., Wampler, R., Kirkpatrick, M., & Saltzman, D. (1963). Effect of spacing presentations on retention of a paired associate over short intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(2), 206–209. doi: 10.1037/h0046694
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (2003). Spacing and repetition effects in human memory: Application of the SAM model. Cognitive Science, 27, 431–452. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2703_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (2005). Rereading effects depend on time of test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 70–80. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, R. J., & Rowe, E. J. (1976). Effects of orienting task and spacing of repetitions on frequency judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 142–152.
   Google Scholar
• Rundus, D. (1971). Analysis of rehearsal processes in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 63–77. doi: 10.1037/h0031185
   Google Scholar
• Russo, R., & Mammarella, N. (2002). Spacing effects in recognition memory: When meaning matters. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 49–59. doi: 10.1080/09541440042000133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, R., Parkin, A. J., Taylor, S. R., & Wilks, J. (1998). Revising current two-process accounts of spacing effects in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 161–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, J. J. (1976). Persistence of the spacing effect in free recall under varying incidental learning conditions. Memory and Cognition, 4, 369–377. doi: 10.3758/BF03213192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, J. J., Zimmerman, J., & Underwood, B. J. (1972). Further evidence on the MP-DP effect in free-recall learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80053-7
   Google Scholar
• Thios, S. J., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1976). Effects of repetition as a function as a function of study-phase retrieval. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 529–536. doi: 10.1016/0022-5371(76)90047-5
   Google Scholar
• Tulving, E., Schacter, D. L., & Stark, H. A. (1982). Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 336–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Schmidt, H. G. (2005). Limitations to the spacing effect: Demonstration of an inverted u-shaped relationship between interrepetition spacing and free recall. Experimental Psychology, 52(4), 257–263. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.52.4.257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlheim, C. N., Maddox, G. B., & Jacoby, L. L. (2014). The role of reminding in the effects of spaced repetitions on cued recall: Sufficient but not necessary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 94–105.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, J. (1975). Free recall after self-paced study: A test of the attention explanation of the spacing effect. American Journal of Psychology, 88, 277–291. doi: 10.2307/1421597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar