Irrelevant speech does not interfere with serial recall in early blind listeners

References

• Avons, S. E., Wright, K. L., & Pammer, K. (1994). The word-length effect in probed and serial recall. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 207–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory - looking back and looking foward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 830–839.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–90). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., Lewis, V., & Vallar, G. (1984). Exploring the articulatory loop. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 233–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 575–589.
   Google Scholar
• Banbury, S., Macken, W. J., Tremblay, S., & Jones, D. M. (2001). Auditory distraction and short-term memory: Phenomena and practical implications. Human Factors, 43, 12–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaman, C. P. (2004). The irrelevant sound phenomenon revisited: What role for working memory capacity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1106–1118.
   Google Scholar
• Beaman, C. P. (2005). Irrelevant sound effects amongst younger and older adults: Objective findings and subjective insights. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 241–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaman, C. P., & Jones, D. M. (1997). Role of serial order in the irrelevant speech effect: Tests of the changing-state hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 459–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2007). Equivalent irrelevant-sound effects for old and young adults. Memory & Cognition, 35, 352–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R., Roer, J. P., Dentale, S., & Buchner, A. (2012). Habituation of the irrelevant sound effect: Evidence for an attentional theory of short-term memory disruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1542–1557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 443–446.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campoy, G. (2008). The effect of word length in short-term memory: Is rehearsal necessary? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 724–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., Rochon, E., & Waters, G. S. (1992). Articulatory and phonological determinants of word length effects in span tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 177–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colle, H. A. (1980). Auditory encoding in visual short-term recall: Effects of noise intensity and spatial location. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 722–735.
   Google Scholar
• Colle, H. A., & Welsh, A. (1976). Acoustic masking in primary memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Collignon, O., Renier, L., Bruyer, R., Tranduy, D., & Veraart, C. (2006). Improved selective and divided spatial attention in early blind subjects. Brain Research, 1075, 175–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dosher, B., & Ma, J.-J. (1998). Output loss or rehearsal loop? Output-time versus pronunciation-time limits in immediate recall for forgetting-matched materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 316–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellermeier, W., & Zimmer, K. (1997). Individual differences in susceptibility to the ‘irrelevant speech’ effect. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 2191–2199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellermeier, W., & Zimmer, K. (2014). The psychoacoustics of the irrevelant sound effect. Acoustical Science and Technology, 35, 10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, E. M. (2002). The irrelevant-speech effect and children: Theoretical implications of developmental change. Memory & Cognition, 30, 478–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadlington, L., Bridges, A. M., & Darby, R. J. (2004). Auditory location in the irrelevant sound effect: The effects of presenting auditory stimuli to either the left ear, right ear or both ears. Brain and Cognition, 55, 545–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, J. R., & Bakopoulou, E. (2003). Irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and phonological similarity: A test of the phonological loop model and the feature model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 435–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, J. R., & Broadbent, C. (1987). The effects of unattended speech on serial recall following auditory presentation. British Journal of Psychology, 78, 287–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, J. R., & Hayes, A. (2012). The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression: Is it a suffix effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 482–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellbrück, J., Kuwano, S., & Namba, S. (1996). Irrelevant background speech and human performance: Is there long-term habituation? Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan, 17, 239–247.
   Google Scholar
• Höttig, K., & Röder, B. (2004). Hearing cheats touch, but less in congenitally blind than in sighted individuals. Psychological Science, 15, 60–64.
   Google Scholar
• Hygge, S., Boman, E., & Enmarker, I. (2003). The effect of road traffic and meaningful irrelevant speech on different memory systems. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 44, 13–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquemot, C., Dupoux, E., & Bachoud-Lévi, A.-C. (2011). Is the word-length effect linked to subvocal rehearsal?. Cortex, 47, 484–493.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. M. (1993). Objects, streams, and threads of auditory attention. In A. D. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention: Selection, awareness and control (pp. 167–198). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. M., Beaman, C. P., & Macken, W. J. (1996). The Object-Oriented Episodic Record Model. In S. E. Gathercole (Ed.), Models of short-term memory (pp. 209–238). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1993). Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: Implications for phonological coding in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 369–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longoni, A. M., Richardson, J. T. E., & Aiello, A. (1993). Articulatory rehearsal and phonological storage in working memory. Memory & Cognition, 21, 11–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackworth, J. F. (1963). The duration of the visual image. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 17, 62–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits to our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory. Memory & Cognition, 18, 251–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neath, I. (2000). Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 403–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neath, I., Suprenant, A. N., & LeCompte, D. C. (1998). Irrelevant speech eliminates the word length effect. Memory & Cognition, 4, 343–354.
   Google Scholar
• Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roder, B., Rosler, F., & Neville, H. J. (2001). Auditory memory in congenitally blind adults: A behavioral-electrophysiological investigation. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 289–303.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roer, J., Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (in press). Evidence for habituation of the irrelevant-sound effect on serial recall. Memory & Cognition. Advance online publication. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0381-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokem, A., & Ahissar, M. (2009). Interactions of cognitive and auditory abilities in congenitally blind individuals. Neuropsychologia, 47, 843–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouleau, N., & Belleville, S. (1996). Irrelevant speech effect in aging: An assessment of inhibitory processes in working memory. Journal of Gerontology, 51B, 356–363.
   Google Scholar
• Salame, P., & Baddeley, A. (1982). Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 150–164.
   Google Scholar
• Salame, P., & Baddeley, A. D. (1987). Noise, unattended speech and short-term memory. Ergonomics, 30, 1185–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. D. (1989). Effects of background music on phonological short-term memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 107–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, S., & Jones, D. M. (1998). Role of habituation in the irrelevant-sound effect: Evidence from the effects of token set size and rate of transition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 659–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, S., Macken, W. J., & Jones, D. M. (2000). Elimination of the word length effect by irrelevant sound revisited. Memory & Cognition, 28, 841–846.
   Google Scholar
• Vo, M.-L., Jacobs, A., & Conrad, M. (2006). Crossvalidating the Berlin Affective Word List (BAWL). Behavior Research Methods, 38, 606–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar