Reasoning, biases and dual processes: The lasting impact of Wason (1960)

References

• Cherubini, P., Castelvecchio, E., & Cherubini, A. M. (2005). Generation of hypotheses in Wason's 2-4-6 task: An information theory approach. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 309–332. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000891
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L. J. (1981). Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 317–370. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00009092
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T. (1972). Interpretation and matching bias in a reasoning task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24, 193–199. doi: 10.1080/00335557243000067
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T. (1989). Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Brighton: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T. (2007). Hypothetical thinking: Dual processes in reasoning and judgement. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T. (2011). Dual-process theories of reasoning: Contemporary issues and developmental applications. Developmental Review, 31, 86–102. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2011.07.007
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2003). Editorial obituary: Peter Wason (1924–2003). Thinking & Reasoning, 9, 177–184. doi: 10.1080/13546780244000141
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T., & Lynch, J. S. (1973). Matching bias in the selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 391–397. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01365.x
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T., Newstead, S. E., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1993). Human reasoning: The psychology of deduction. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T., & Over, D. E. (2004). If. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T., & Wason, P. C. (1976). Rationalisation in a reasoning task. British Journal of Psychology, 63, 205–212.
   Google Scholar
• Farris, H. H., & Revlin, R. (1989). Sensible reasoning in two tasks: Rule discovery and hypothesis evalution. Memory & Cognition, 17, 221–232. doi: 10.3758/BF03197071
   Google Scholar
• Gale, M., & Ball, L. J. (2006). Dual-goal facilitation in Wason's 2-4-6 task: What mediates successful rule discovery?. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 873–885. doi: 10.1080/02724980543000051
   Google Scholar
• Gale, M., & Ball, L. J. (2009). Exploring the determinants of dual goal facilitation in a rule discovery task. Thinking & Reasoning, 15, 294–315. doi: 10.1080/13546780903040666
   Google Scholar
• Gale, M., & Ball, L. J. (2012). Contrast class cues and performance facilitation in a hypothesis-testiing task: Evidence for an interative counterfactual model. Memory & Cognition, 40, 408–419. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0159-z
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, R. Q., & Wason, P. C. (1972). Degrees of insight. British Journal of Psychology, 63, 205–212. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1972.tb02101.x
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, M. E., & Gorman, M. E. (1984). Comparison of disconfirmatory, confirmatory and control strategies on Wason's 2-4-6 task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 629–648. doi: 10.1080/14640748408402183
   Google Scholar
• Henle, M. (1962). On the relation between logic and thinking. Psychological Review, 69, 366–378. doi: 10.1037/h0042043
   Google Scholar
• Howson, C., & Urbach, P. (2006). Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach (3rd ed.). Chicago: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Wason, P. C. (1970). A theoretical analysis of insight into a reasoning task. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 134–148. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(70)90009-5
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kareev, Y., & Halberstadt, N. (1993). Evaluating negative tests and refutations in a rule discovery task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 46, 715–727. doi: 10.1080/14640749308401035
   Google Scholar
• Kareev, Y., Halberstadt, K., & Shafir, D. (1993). Improving performance and increasing the use of non-positive testing in a rule-discovery task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 46, 729–742. doi: 10.1080/14640749308401036
   Google Scholar
• Klayman, J., & Ha, Y. W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211–228. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.211
   Google Scholar
• Lien, Y. W., & Lin, W. L. (2011). From falsification to generating an alternative hypothesis: Exploring the role of the new-perspective hypothesis in successful 2-4-6 task performance. Thinking & Reasoning, 17, 105–136. doi: 10.1080/13546783.2011.553466
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, E. J., & Ball, L. J. (2005). Think-aloud protocols and the selection task: Evidence for relevance effects and rationalisation processes. Thinking and Reasoning, 11, 35–66. doi: 10.1080/13546780442000114
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. (1967). The psychology of communication. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mynatt, C. R., Doherty, M. E., & Tweney, R. D. (1977). Confirmation bias in a simulated research environment: An experimental study of scientific inference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24, 326–329.
   Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1994a). Another look at eliminative and enumerative behaviour in a conceptual task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 149–169. doi: 10.1080/09541449408520141
   Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1994b). A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychological Review, 101, 608–631. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.608
   Google Scholar
• Poletiek, F. (2001). Hypothesis-testing behaviour. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Spellman, B. A., Lopez, A. L., & Smith, E. E. (1999). Hypothesis testing: Strategy selection for generalising versus limiting hypotheses. Thinking & Reasoning, 5, 67–91. doi: 10.1080/135467899394084
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Elrbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2004). The robot’s rebellion: Finding meaning the age of Darwin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2011). Rationality and the reflective mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A., Prowse Turner, J. A., & Pennycook, G. (2011). Intuition, reason, and metacognition. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 107–140. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
   Google Scholar
• Tweney, R. D., Doherty, M. E., Warner, W. J., Pliske, D. B., Mynatt, C. R., Gross, K. A., Arkkelin, D. L. (1980). Strategies of rule discovery in an inference task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 109–123. doi: 10.1080/00335558008248237
   Google Scholar
• Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2012). Utilities in the 2-4-6 task. Experimental Psychology, 59, 265–271. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000152
   Google Scholar
• Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Austin, N. G., & Rankin, S. (1995). Inducing a rule in Wason's 2-4-6 task: A test of the information quantity and goal-complementarity hypotheses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 895–914. doi: 10.1080/14640749508401422
   Google Scholar
• Vallée-Tourangeau, F., & Payton, T. (2008). Graphical representation fosters discovery in the 2-4-6 task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 625–640. doi: 10.1080/17470210701268039
   Google Scholar
• Vallée-Tourangeau, F., & Penney, A. (2005). The impact of external representation in a rule discovery task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 820–834. doi: 10.1080/09541440440000249
   Google Scholar
• Van der Henst, J. B. (2006). Symposium on “Cognition and Rationality: Part I” Relevance effects in reasoning. Mind & Society, 5, 229–245. doi: 10.1007/s11299-006-0019-x
   Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C. (1959). The processing of positive and negative information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 92–107. doi: 10.1080/17470215908416296
   Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129–140.
   Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C. (1961). Response to affirmative and negative binary propositions. British Journal of Psychology, 52, 133–142. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1961.tb00775.x
   Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C. (1962). Reply to Wetherick. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 250. doi: 10.1080/17470216208416543
   Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C. (1965). The contexts of plausible denial. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 7–11. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(65)80060-3
   Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C. (1966). Reasoning. In B. M. Foss (Ed.), New horizons in psychology I (pp. 106–137). Harmandsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C. (1968). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses: A second look. In P. C. Wason & P. N. Johnson-Laird (Eds.), Thinking and reasoning (pp. 165–174). Harmandsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C. (1972). In real life negatives are false. Logique et Analyse, 19, 19–38.
   Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C. (1977). The theory of formal operations: A critique. In B. Gerber (Ed.), Piaget and knowing (pp. 119–135). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C. (1981). The importance of cognitive illusions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 356. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00009353
   Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C. (1983). Realism and rationality in the selection task. In J. St. B. T. Evans (Ed.), Thinking and reasoning: Psychological approaches (pp. 44–75). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C., & Brooks, P. G. (1979). THOG: The anatomy of a problem. Psychological Research, 41, 79–90. doi: 10.1007/BF00309425
   Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C., & Evans, J. St. B. T. (1975). Dual processes in reasoning? Cognition, 3, 141–154. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(74)90017-1
   Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1970). A conflict between selecting and evaluating information in an inferential task. British Journal of Psychology, 61, 509–515. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1970.tb01270.x
   Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972). Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content. London: Batsford.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherick, N. E. (1962). Eliminative and enumerative behaviour in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 246–249. doi: 10.1080/17470216208416542
   Google Scholar
• Wharton, C. M., Cheng, P. W., & Wickens, T. D. (1993). Hypothesis-testing strategies: Why two goals are better than one. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 743–758. doi: 10.1080/14640749308401037
   Google Scholar