Illusory line motion is not caused by object-differentiating mechanisms or endogenous attention

REFERENCES

• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2013). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package. version 1.0-5. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
   Google Scholar
• Briand, K., & Klein, R. M. (1987). Is Posner’s “beam” the same as Treisman’s “glue”?: On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory. Paper presented at the Psychonomics Society, New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, J., & Barresi, J. (2002). Using illusory line motion to differentiate misrepresentation (stalinesque) and misremembering (orwellian) accounts of consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 347–365. doi: 10.1006/ccog.2001.0539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, J., & Klein, R. M. (2005). Does attention cause illusory line motion? Perception & Psychophysics, 67(6), 1032–1043. doi: 10.3758/BF03193629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing, P. E., & Treisman, A. M. (1997). The line-motion illusion: Attention or impletion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(3), 768–779.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and neurological populations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(2), 161–177. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.123.2.161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hikosaka, O., Miyauchi, S., & Shimojo, S. (1993a). Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation. Vision Research, 33(9), 1219–1240. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90210-N
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hikosaka, O., Miyauchi, S., & Shimojo, S. (1993b). Voluntary and stimulus-induced attention detected as motion sensation. Perception, 22, 517–526. doi: 10.1068/p220517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishigami, Y., Klein, R. M., & Christie, J. (2009). Exploring the modulation of attentional capture by attentional control settings using performance and illusory line motion. Visual Cognition, 17(3), 431–456. doi: 10.1080/13506280802061796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jancke, D., Chavane, F., Naaman, S., & Grinvald, A. (2004). Imaging the cortical correlates of illusion in early visual cortex. Nature, 429(23), 423–426. doi: 10.1038/nature02396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, A., & Duddy, M. (2002). Visual orienting with central and peripheral precues: Deconfounding the contributions of cue eccentricity, cue discrimination and spatial correspondence. Visual Cognition, 9, 303–336. doi: 10.1080/13506280042000199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, A., Roser, M., Wells, I., & Heffer, C. (2006). The spatial correspondence hypothesis and orienting in response to central and peripheral spatial cues. Visual Cognition, 13(1), 65–88. doi: 10.1080/13506280500264460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyauchi, S., Shimojo, S., & Hikosaka, O. (1991). Attention-related motion sensation is produced by local facilitation of detection [Abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, 32, 716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama, K., & MacKeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research, 29(11), 1631–1647. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90144-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed effects models in S and S-plus. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W. C. (2000). Endogenous attention and illusory line motion reexamined. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(3), 980–996.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmidt, W. C., & Klein, R. M. (1997). A spatial gradient of acceleration and temporal extension underlies three illusions of motion. Perception, 26, 857–874. doi: 10.1068/p260857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, K. A., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Components of visual prior entry. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 333–366. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00035-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse, P., Cavanagh, P., & Nakayama, K. (1998). The role of parsing in high-level motion processing. In T. Watanabe (Ed.), High-level motion processing—computational, neurobiological and psychophysical perspectives (pp. 249–266). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vecera, S. P., & Farah, M. J. (1994). Does visual attention select objects or locations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(2), 146–160. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.123.2.146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, B. C., Juola, J. F., & Koshino, H. (1990). Voluntary allocation versus automatic capture of visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 48(3), 243–251. doi: 10.3758/BF03211524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar