The segment as the minimal planning unit in speech production: Evidence based on absolute response latencies

REFERENCES

• Bell-Berti, F., & Harris, K. S. (1981). A temporal model of speech production. Phonetica, 38, 9–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, K. (1996). Language production: Methods and methodologies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 395–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5, 341–345.
   Google Scholar
• Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49, 155–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholin, J., Dell, G. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2011). Planning and articulation in incremental word production: Syllable-frequency effects in English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 37, 109–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual-route cascade model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F. (2003). Articulatory duration in single-word speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 416–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Juliano, C., & Govindjee, A. (1993). A theory of frame constraints in phonological speech errors. Cognitive Science, 17, 149–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1991). The density constraint on form-priming in the naming task: Interference effects from a masked prime. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, J. R., & Kroll, J. F. (1976). Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 361–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M. (2006). Limited interaction in speech production: Chronometric, speech error, and neurophysiological evidence. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 817–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, M. I. (1990). Motor learning and the degrees of freedom problem. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and performance, XIII, (pp. 796–836). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kawamoto, A. H. (1999). Incremental encoding and incremental articulation in speech production: Evidence based on response latency and initial segment duration. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 48–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamoto, A. H., Kello, C. T., Higareda, I., & Vu, J. (1999). Parallel processing and initial phoneme criterion in naming words: Evidence from frequency effects on onset and rime duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 362–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamoto, A. H., Kello, C. T., Jones, R. M., & Bame, K. (1998). Initial phoneme versus whole word criterion to initiate pronunciation: Evidence based on response latency and initial phoneme duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 862–885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamoto, A. H., & Liu, Q. (2007). A unified account of duration and coarticulatory effects in speech production. In D. S. McNamara, & G. Trafton (pp. 1151–1156). Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Kawamoto, A. H., Liu, Q., Mura, K., & Sanchez, A. (2008). Articulatory preparation in the delayed naming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 347–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kello, C. T. (2004). Control over the time course of cognition in the tempo-naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 942–955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kello, C. T., & Kawamoto, A. H. (1998). Runword: An IBM-PC software package for the collection and acoustic analysis of speeded naming response. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 30, 371–383.
   Google Scholar
• Kello, C. T., Plaut, D. C., & MacWhinney, B. (2000). The task dependence of staged versus cascaded processing: An empirical and computational study of Stroop interference in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 340–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinoshita, S., & Woollams, A. (2002). The masked onset priming effect in naming: Computation of phonology or speech planning?. Memory & Cognition, 30, 237–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay, D. G. (1987). The organization of perception and action: A theory of action and other cognitive skills. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. (1990). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: The encoding of successive syllables of a word. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 524–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. (1991). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological coding inside a syllable. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 69–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. (1982). Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: n search of partial output. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 273–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pechmann, T., Reetz, H., & Zerbst, D. (1989). Kritik einer Meβmethode: Zur Ungenaugket von Voice-key Messungen [Critique of a method of measurement: On the unreliability of voice-key measurements.]. Sprache & Kognition, 8, 65–71.
   Google Scholar
• Plaut, D., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., Croot, K. P., Harrington, J. M., & Coltheart, M. (2005). Characterizing the motor execution stage of speech production: Consonantal effects on delayed naming latency and onset duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 1083–1095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2002). On the complexities of measuring naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 307–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., Harrington, J., Coltheart, M. & Palethorpe, S. (2000). Reading aloud begins when the computation of phonology is complete. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 1178–1191.
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2002). Spoken language planning and the initiation of articulation. The Quarterly Jounal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 465–483.
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2004). Seriality of phonological encoding in naming objects and reading their names. Memory & Cognition, 32, 212–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakuma, N., Fushimi, T., & Tatsumi, I. (1997). Onseiha no shisatsu ni yoru kana no ondokusenji no sokutei: Ondokusenji wa gotton no choonho ni ori okiku kotonaru [Naming latency measurements of kana based on inspection of voice waveforms: Naming latency varies greatly depending on the manner of articulation of the initial phoneme.]. Shinkeishinrigaku, 13, 126–136.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, N. O. & Costa, A. (2006). Activation of segments, not syllables, during phonological encoding in speech production. The Mental Lexicon, 1, 231–250.
   Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., & Teruel, E. (1999). Phonological facilitation in the production of two-word utterances. The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 17–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolensky, P., Goldrick, M., & Mathis, D. (2013). Optimization and quantization in gradient symbol systems: A framework for integrating the continuous and the discrete in cognition. Cognitive Science. doi:10.1111/cogs.12047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L., & Wright, C. E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 117–152). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalen, D. H. (1990). Coarticulation is largely planned. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 3–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar