The effect of blocking inter-trial interval on sequential effects in absolute identification

References

• Brown, S. D., & Heathcote, A. J. (2008). The simplest complete model of choice reaction time: Linear ballistic accumulation. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 153–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. D., Marley, A., Donkin, C., & Heathcote, A. J. (2008). An integrated model of choices and response times in absolute identification. Psychological Review, 115, 396–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donkin, C., Brown, S., & Heathcote, A. J. (2011). Drawing conclusions from response time models: A tutorial using the linear ballistic accumulator model. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55, 140–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, T., Kemp, C., & Tenenbaum, J. (2008). Bayesian models of cognition. In R. Sun (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of computational psychology (pp. 59–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, M. K., & Lockhead, G. R. (1968). Sequential effects in absolute judgments of loudness. Perception & Psychophysics, 3, 409–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, M. I. (2004). Graphical models. Statistical Science, 19, 140–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, J. A., Donkin, C., Korb, F. M., & Egner, T. (2012). Model-based analysis of context-specific cognitive control. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 358. doi: 10.3389/fp-syg.2012.00358
   Google Scholar
• Lacouture, Y., & Marley, A. (1995). A mapping model of bow effects in absolute identifi­cation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 383–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. D. (2008). Three case studies in the Bayesian analysis of cognitive models. Psy- chonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2014). Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malmberg, K., & Annis, J. (2012). On the relationship between memory and perception: Sequential dependencies in recognition memory testing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 233–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marley, A. A. J., & Cook, V. T. (1984). A fixed rehearsal capacity interpretation of limits on absolute identification performance. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 136–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, W., & Stewart, N. (2009a). The effect of inter-stimulus interval on sequential effects in absolute identification. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 2014–2029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, W., & Stewart, N. (2009b). Psychophysics and the judgment of price: Judging complex objects on a non-physical dimension elicits sequential effects like those in perceptual tasks. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 64–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for information processing. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, S., & Ward, L. M. (1995). Pure feedback effects in absolute identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1065–1079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack, I. (1952). The information of elementary auditory displays. Journal of the Acous­tical Society of America, 24, 745–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9, 347–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, R. M., Lee, M. D., Kim, W., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2008). A survey of model evaluation approaches with a tutorial on hierarchical Bayesian methods. Cognitive Science, 32, 1248–1284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, N., Brown, G. D. A., & Chater, N. (2005). Absolute identification by relative judgment. Psychological Review, 112, 881–911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triesman, M., & Williams, T. C. (1984). A theory of criterion setting with an application to sequential dependencies. Psychological Review, 91, 68–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ravenzwaaij, D., Mulder, M., Tuerlinckx, F., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2012). Do the dynamics of prior information depend on task context? An analysis of optimal performance and an empirical test. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 132. doi: 10.3389/fp-syg.2012.00132
   Google Scholar
• Viviani, P. (1979). A diffusion model for discrimination of temporal numerosity. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 19, 108–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E.-J., Lodewyckx, T., Kuriyal, H., & Grasman, R. (2010). Bayesian hypoth­esis testing for psychologists: A tutorial on the Savage-Dickey procedure. Cognitive Psychology, 60, 158–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, L. M., & Lockhead, G. R. (1970). Sequential effect and memory in category judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, L. M., & Lockhead, G. R. (1971). Response system processes in absolute judgment. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 73–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, C. N., Mumford, J. A., & Poldrack, R. A. (2012). Perceptual criteria in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 16716–16724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zotov, V., Jones, M., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2011). Contrast and assimilation in cate­gorization and exemplar production. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 621–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar