A mega recognition memory study of 2897 disyllabic words

REFERENCES

• Adelman, J. S., & Estes, Z. (2013). Emotion and memory: A recognition advantage for positive and negative words independent of arousal. Cognition, 129, 530–535. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Burgess, G., Cortese, M. J., & Adams, D. A. (2002). The Word-Frequency Mirror Effect in young, old, and early-stage Alzheimer's disease: Evidence for two processes in episodic recognition performance. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 199–226. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., & Neely, J. H. (1980). Test-expectancy and word-frequency effects in recall and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 576–587.
   Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., & Spieler, D. H. (1998). The utility of item-level analyses in model evaluation: A reply to Seidenberg & Plaut. Psychological Science, 9(3), 238–240. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459. doi:10.3758/BF03193014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besner, D., & Bourassa, D. C. (1995, June). Localist and parallel processing models of visual word recognition: A few more words. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Brain, Behavior and Cognitive Science Society. Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and imporved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, V., & Winograd, E. (1986). Word imagery but not age of acquisition affects episodic memory. Memory & Cognition, 14, 174–180. doi: 10.3758/BF03198377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortese, M. J., & Fugett, A. (2004). Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 384–387. doi:10.3758/BF03195585
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cortese, M. J., & Khanna, M. M. (2007). Age of acquisition predicts naming and lexical-decision performance above and beyond 22 other predictor variables: An analysis of 2,342 words. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1072–1082. doi:10.1080/174701071315467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortese, M.J., & Khanna, M.M. (2008). Age of acquisition ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 791–794. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.791
   Google Scholar
• Cortese, M. J., Khanna, M. M., & Hacker, S. D. (2010). Recognition memory for 2,578 monosyllabic words. Memory, 18(6), 595–609. doi:10.1080/09658211.2010.493892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortese, M.J., & Schock, J. (2013). Imageability and age of acquisition effects in disyllabic word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 946–972. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.722660
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, S., & Humphreys, M. S. (2001). A context noise model of episodic word recognition. Psychological Review, 108, 452–478. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.108.2.452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewhurst, S. A., Hitch, G. J., & Barry, C. (1998). Separate effects of word frequency and age of acquisition in recognition and recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 284–298. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.24.2.284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrand, L., New, B., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., Bonin, P., Méot, A., Augustinova, M., & Pallier, C. (2010). The French Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 488–496. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.2.488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I. (2000). The potential for experimenter bias effects in word recognition experiments. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1109–1115. doi:10.3758/BF03211812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilhooly, K. J., & Gilhooly, M. L. (1979). Age-of-acquisition effects in lexical and episodic memory tasks. Memory & Cognition, 7, 214–223. doi: 10.3758/BF03197541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glanzer, M., & Bowles, N. (1976). Analysis of the word-frequency effect in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–565. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, M. J., Kuchinke, L., Biemann, C., Tamm, S., & Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Remembering words in context as predicted by an associative read-out model. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 252. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, C., Neath, I., Sturart, G., Shostak, L., Surprenaunt, A. M., & Brown, G. D. A. (2006). The distinctiveness of the word length effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 586–594. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, B. J. (2005). Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 684–712. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S. H. K., Balota, D. A., & Yap, M. J. (2009). Pathway control in visual word processing: Converging evidence from recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 692–698. doi:10.375&/PBR.16.4.692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Diependaele, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Practice effects in large-scale visual word recognition studies: A lexical decision study on 14,000 Dutch mono- and disyllabic words and nonwords. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 174. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2011). The British lexicon project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 287–304. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0118-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Loon-Vervoorn, W. A. (1989). Eigenschappen van basiswoorden. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Chappell, M. (1998). Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 105, 724–760. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.4.734-760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, P. E. (1981). Age of acquisition, imagery, recall, and the limitations of multiple-regression analysis. Memory & Cognition, 9, 277–282. doi: 10.3758/BF03196961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114(2), 273–315. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. C. (1980). 51 properties of 125 words: A unit analysis of verbal behavior. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 736–755. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90415-6
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. C., & Friendly, M. (1986). Predicting which words get recalled: Measures of free recall, availability, goodness, emotionality, and pronunciability for 925 nouns. Memory & Cognition, 14, 79–94. doi: 10.3758/BF03209231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schock, J., Cortese, M. J., Khanna, M. M. (2012). Imageability estimates for 3,000 disyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 374–379. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0162-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schock, J., Cortese, M. J., & Khanna, M. M., & Toppi, S. (2012). Age of acquisition estimates for 3,000 disyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 971–977. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0209-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., & Waters, G. S. (1989). Word recognition and naming: A mega study [Abstract]. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 489.
   Google Scholar
• Spieler, D. H., & Balota, D. A. (1997). Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level. Psychological Science, 8(6), 411–416. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00453.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehan, G., & Tolan, G. A. (2007). Word length effects in long-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 35–48. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107–136. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T., Balota, D. A., & Yap, M. J. (2008). Beyond Coltheart's N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 971–979. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.5.971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441–517. doi:10.1006/jmla.2002.2864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zevin, J. D., & Balota, D. A. (2000). Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways during naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 121–135. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.26.1.121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar