Effects of animacy on processing relative clauses in older and younger adults

REFERENCES

• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2007). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.6. 09)[Computer program]. Retrieved June 24, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2013). Reconciling time, space and function: A new dorsal–ventral stream model of sentence comprehension. Brain and Language, 125(1), 60–76. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.01.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., DeDe, G., Waters, G., Michaud, J., & Tripodis, Y. (2011). Effects of age, speed of processing, and working memory on comprehension of sentences with relative clauses. Psychology and Aging, 26(2), 439–450. doi:10.1037/a0021837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., Williams, C. C., Zacks, R. T., & Ferreira, F. (2006). Younger and older adults’ “good-enough” interpretations of garden-path sentences. Discourse Processes, 42(2), 205–238. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp4202_6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25(2), 257–271. doi:10.3758/BF03204507
   Google Scholar
• Dagerman, K. S., MacDonald, M. C., & Ham, M. (2006). Aging and the use of context in ambiguity resolution: Complex changes from simple slowing. Cognitive Science, 30, 311–345. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeDe, G. (2013). Reading and listening in people with aphasia: Effects of syntactic complexity. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22(4), 579–590. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0111)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeDe, G. (2014). Sentence comprehension in older adults: Evidence for risky processing strategies. Experimental Aging Research, 40(4), 436–454. doi 10.1080/0361073X.2014.926775
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, J. (1994). SoundEdit (Version 2) [Computer software]. San Francisco, CA: Macromedia.
   Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (2005). Aging in context: Age-related changes in context use during language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 42, 133–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00274.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorenko, E., & Gibson, E. (2007). A resource-based account of animacy effects in the processing of relative clauses. Poster presented at the 20th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, San Diego CA, March 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C. Jr. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(3), 348–368. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90006-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Pergamon Press. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
   Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D. (2009). Pathways to language: Fiber tracts in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 175–181. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1), 1–76. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Johnson, M. (2001). Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1411–1423. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Levine, W. H. (2002). Memory-load interference in syntactic processing. Psychological Science, 13, 425–430. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemper, S., & Liu, C. J. (2007). Eye movements of young and older adults during reading. Psychology and Aging, 22(1), 84–93. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.1.84
   Google Scholar
• Kemtes, K. A., & Kemper, S. (1997). Younger and older adults’ on-line processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences. Psychology and Aging, 12(2), 362–371. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.12.2.362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146, 23–49. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676–703. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, B. R., Grison, S., Gao, X., Christianson, K., Morrow, D. G., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. (2014). Aging and individual differences in binding during sentence understanding: Evidence from temporary and global syntactic attachment ambiguities. Cognition, 130(2), 157–173. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Reichle, E., Stroud, M., Williams, C., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers. Psychology and Aging, 21, 448–465. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roland, D., Dick, F., & Elman, J. L. (2007). Frequency of basic English grammatical structures: A corpus analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(3), 348–379. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103(3), 403–428. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Noh, S. R., & Shake, M. C. (2010). Age differences in the effects of conceptual integration training on resource allocation in sentence processing. The Quaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(7), 1430–1455. doi: 10.1080/17470210903330983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Ryan, S. & Leonard, J. S. (2000). Age differences in on-line syntactic processing. Experimental Aging Research, 26, 315–322. doi:10.1080/036107300750015714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., Morris, R. K., & Seely, R. E. (2002). Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 69–90. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., Williams, R. S., Blozis, S. A., & Morris, R. K. (2005). Working memory, animacy, and verb class in the processing of relative clauses. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 204–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.010 doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueswell, J. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1994). Toward a lexical framework of constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution. In Clifton, C. Jr., Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 155–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (2005). The relationship between age, processing speed, working memory capacity and language comprehension. Memory, 13, 403–413. doi:10.1080/09658210344000459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar