Semantic transparency in free stems: The effect of Orthography-Semantics Consistency on word recognition

REFERENCES

• Andrews, S., & Lo, S. (2013). Is morphological priming stronger for transparent than opaque words? It depends on individual differences in spelling and vocabulary. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 279–296. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, S., Ge, R., & Moitra, A. (2012). Learning topic models - going beyond SVD. In D. Shmoys & T. Roughgarden (Eds.), 53rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2012, New Brunswick, NJ, USA, October 20–23, 2012 (pp. 1–10). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Durdević, D. F., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M. (2011). An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, 118, 438–481. doi: 10.1037/a0023851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Bertram, R., Baayen, R. H., & Schreuder, R. (2000). Effects of family size for complex words. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 390–405. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullinaria, J. A., & Levy, J. P. (2007). Extracting semantic representations from word co-occurrence statistics: A computational study. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 510–526. doi: 10.3758/BF03193020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, K., & Hanks, P. (1990). Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16, 22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1983). The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 249–254. doi: 10.1177/014662168300700301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713–758. doi: 10.1037/a0019738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, N. H., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000). The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 329–365. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin, J. T., Jamison, H. L., Matthews, P. M., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2004). Morphology and the internal structure of words. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 14984–14988. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403766101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J. A., Morris, J., & Keuleers, E. (2011). Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 344–358. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2005). Masked cross-modal morphological priming: Unravelling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 75–114. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2009). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. Memory & Cognition, 37, 895–908. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.6.895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinu, G., The Pham, N., & Baroni, M. (2013). DISSECT: DIStributional SEmantics Composition Toolkit. In H. Schuetze, P. Fung, & M. Poesio (Eds.), 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2013, Proceedings of the Conference System Demonstrations, 4–9 August 2013, Sofia, Bulgaria (pp. 31–36). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. B., Kostić, A., Gvozdenović, V., O'Connor, P. A., & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F. (2012). Semantic similarity influences early morphological priming in Serbian: A challenge to form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 668–676. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0250-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. B., O'Connor, P. A., & Moscoso del Prado Martin, F. (2009). Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 684–691. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.4.684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Whitney, C. (2004). Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 58–59. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuven, W. J. B. van, Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1176–1190. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.850521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison, K., Balota, D., Neely, J., Cortese, M., Cohen-Shikora, E., Tse, C.-S., et al. (2013). The semantic priming project. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1099–1114. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0304-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvikivi, J., & Pyykkönen, P. (2011). Sub- and supralexical information in early phases of lexical access. Frontiers in Psychology, 2:282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, T. R., Thomas, S. M., Patching, G. R., & Scott-Brown, K. C. (2003). Assessing the importance of letter pairs in initial, exterior, and interior positions in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 883–893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazanina, N. (2011). Decomposition of prefixed words in Russian. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1371–1390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazanina, N., Dukova-Zheleva, G., Geber, D., Kharlamov, V., & Tonciulescu, K. (2008). Decomposition into multiple morphemes during lexical access: A masked priming study of Russian nouns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 800–823. doi: 10.1080/01690960701799635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 287–304. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0118-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruskal, W. (1987). Relative importance by averaging over orderings. The American Statistician, 41, 6–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landauer, T., & Dumais, S. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavric, A., Clapp, A., & Rastle, K. (2007). ERP evidence of morphological analysis from orthography: A masked priming study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 866–877. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.5.866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindeman, R. H., Merenda, P. F., & Gold, R. Z. (1980). Introduction to bivariate and multivariate analysis. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
   Google Scholar
• Longtin, C., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 313–334. doi: 10.1080/01690960244000036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical cooccurrence. Behavioural Research Methods, 28, 203–208. doi: 10.3758/BF03204766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marelli, M., Amenta, S., Morone, E. A., & Crepaldi, D. (2013). Meaning is in the beholder's eye: Morpho-semantic effects in masked priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 534–541. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0363-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Bozic, M., & Randall, B. (2008). Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form, and meaning. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 394–421. doi: 10.1080/01690960701588004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1993). Bivariate median splits and spurious statistical significance. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 181–190. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.113.1.181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, S. F., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Is there a ‘fete’ in ‘fetish’? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 307–326. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, J., Frank, T., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2007). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: An ERP investigation. Psychophysiology, 44, 506–521. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00538.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Bertram, R., Häikiö, T., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2004). Morphological family size in a morphologically rich language: The case of Finnish compared to Dutch and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1271–1278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 445–485. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 942–971. doi: 10.1080/01690960802069730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 507–537. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090–1098. doi: 10.3758/BF03196742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueckl, J. G., & Aicher, K. A. (2008). Are corner and brother morphologically complex? Not in the long term. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 972–1001. doi: 10.1080/01690960802211027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 745–765. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turney, P. D., & Pantel, P. (2010). From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 37, 141–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Farrell, S. (2004). AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 192–196. doi: 10.3758/BF03206482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S. J., Johnson, R. L., Liversedge, S. P., & Rayner, K. (2008). Eye movements when reading transposed text: The importance of word-beginning letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1261–1276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. F. J. (1986). Jackknife, bootstrap and other resampling methods in regression analysis. The Annals of Statistics, 14, 1261–1295. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176350142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., & Yap, M. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart's N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 971–979. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar