Where did it come from, where do you go? Direction sources influence navigation decisions during spatial uncertainty

REFERENCES

• Allen, G. L. (2000). Principles and practices for communicating route knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14(4), 333–359. doi: 10.1002/1099-0720(200007/08)14:4<333::AID-ACP655>3.0.CO;2-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alm, H., Nilsson, L., Jármark, S., Savelid, J., & Hennings, U. (1992). The effects of landmark presentation on driver performance and uncertainty in a navigation task— A field study (Swedish Prometheus, Tech. Rep. No. S/IT-4). Linköping, Sweden: VTI.
   Google Scholar
• Bailenson, J. N., Shum, M. S., & Uttal, D. H. (1998). Road climbing: Principles governing asymmetric route choices on maps. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18(3), 251–264. doi: 10.1006/jevp.1998.0095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailenson, J. N., Shum, M. S., & Uttal, D. H. (2000). The initial segment strategy: A heuristic for route selection. Memory & Cognition, 28(2), 306–318. doi: 10.3758/BF03213808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengler, K., Haller, R., & Zimmer, A. (1994). Experimental optimisation of route guidance information using context information. Paper presented at the First World Congress on Applications of Transport and Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems., Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Biegler, R., & Morris, R. (1996). Landmark stability: Studies exploring whether the perceived stability of the environment influences spatial representation. Journal of Experimental Biology, 199(1), 187–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunyé, T. T., Andonova, E., Meneghetti, C., Noordzij, M. L., Pazzaglia, F., Wienemann, R., … Taylor, H. A. (2012). Planning routes around the world: International evidence for southern route preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 297–304. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunyé, T. T., Mahoney, C. R., Gardony, A. L., & Taylor, H. A. (2010). North is up (hill): Route planning heuristics in real-world environments. Memory & Cognition, 38(6), 700–712. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.6.700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunyé, T. T., & Taylor, H. A. (2008). Extended experience benefits spatial mental model development with route but not survey descriptions. Acta Psychologica, 127(2), 340–354. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett, G. E. (2000). “Turn right at the traffic lights”: The requirement for landmarks in vehicle navigation systems. The Journal of Navigation, 53(3), 499–510. doi: 10.1017/S0373463300001028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett, G., Smith, D., & May, A. (2001). Supporting the navigation task: Characteristics of ‘good' landmarks. Contemporary Ergonomics, 1, 441–446.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, P. C. (1997). Navigation and the older driver (Unpublished PhD dissertation), Loughborough University, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Chown, E., Kaplan, S., & Kortenkamp, D. (1995). Prototypes, location, and associative networks (PLAN): Towards a unified theory of cognitive mapping. Cognitive Science, 19(1), 1–51. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1901_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collett, T. (1996). Insect navigation en route to the goal: Multiple strategies for the use of landmarks. Journal of Experimental Biology, 199(1), 227–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. C. (2003). The secret is to follow your nose: Route path selection and angularity. Environment and Behavior, 35(1), 107–131. doi: 10.1177/0013916502238867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, M. P., & Denis, M. (1998). Spatial descriptions as navigational aids: A cognitive analysis of route directions. Kognitionswissenschaft, 7(1), 45–52. doi: 10.1007/s001970050050
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, M. P., Przytula, E., & Denis, M. (2009). Spoken versus written route directions. Cognitive processing, 10, 201–203. doi: 10.1007/s10339-009-0297-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, M. P., Tom, A., Manghi, E., & Denis, M. (2003). Testing the value of route directions through navigational performance. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 3, 269–289. doi: 10.1207/s15427633scc0304_2
   Google Scholar
• Denis, M. (1997). The description of routes: A cognitive approach to the production of spatial discourse. Current Psychology of Cognition, 16, 409–458.
   Google Scholar
• Denis, M., Pazzaglia, F., Cornoldi, C., & Bertolo, L. (1997). Spatial discourse and navigation: An analysis of route directions in the city of Venice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 145–174. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199904)13:2<145::AID-ACP550>3.0.CO;2-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dräger, M., & Koller, A. (2012). Generation of landmark-based navigation instructions from open-source data. Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 757–766.
   Google Scholar
• Duckham, M., Winter, S., & Robinson, M. (2010). Including landmarks in routing instructions. Journal of Location Based Services, 4(1), 28–52. doi: 10.1080/17489721003785602
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R., & Kiris, E. O. (1995). The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37(2), 381–394. doi: 10.1518/001872095779064555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foo, P., Warren, W. H., Duchon, A., & Tarr, M. J. (2005). Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Map- versus landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(2), 195–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankenstein, J., Büchner, S. J., Tenbrink, T., & Hölscher, C. (2010). Influence of geometry and objects on local route choices during wayfinding. Spatial Cognition VII (pp. 41–53). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-14749-4_7
   Google Scholar
• Gardony, A., Brunyé, T. T., Mahoney, C. R., & Taylor, H. A. (2011). Affective states influence spatial cue utilization during navigation. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 20(3), 223–240. doi: 10.1162/PRES_a_00046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gärling, T. (1995). Urban cognition. Waltham, MA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gärling, T., Book, A., & Lindberg, E. (1984). Cognitive mapping of large-scale environments the interrelationship of action plans, acquisition, and orientation. Environment and Behavior, 16(1), 3–34. doi: 10.1177/0013916584161001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gärling, T., & Golledge, R. G. (2000). Cognitive mapping and spatial decision making. Cognitive mapping: Past, present, and future (pp. 44–65). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103(4), 650. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golding, J. M., Graesser, A. C., & Hauselt, J. (1996). The process of answering direction-giving questions when someone is lost on a university campus: The role of pragmatics. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10(1), 23–39. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199602)10:1<23::AID-ACP357>3.0.CO;2-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golledge, R. G., & Spector, A. N. (1978). Comprehending the urban environment: Theory and practice. Geographical Analysis, 10(4), 403–426. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1978.tb00667.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, W. D., Sims, C. R., Fu, W. T., & Schoelles, M. J. (2006). The soft constraints hypothesis: A rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behavior. Psychological Review, 113(3), 461. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hile, H., Vedantham, R., Cuellar, G., Liu, A., Gelfand, N., Grzeszczuk, R., & Borriello, G. (2008, December). Landmark-based pedestrian navigation from collections of geotagged photos. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on mobile and ubiquitous multimedia, ACM, pp. 145–1527.
   Google Scholar
• Hirtle, S., Richter, K. F., & Srinivas, S. (2010). This is the tricky part: When directions become difficult. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 1, 53–73.
   Google Scholar
• Hochmair, H., & Frank, A. U. (2000). Influence of estimation errors on wayfinding-decisions in unknown street networks–analyzing the least-angle strategy. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2(4), 283–313. doi: 10.1023/A:1015566423907
   Google Scholar
• Hölscher, C., Tenbrink, T., & Wiener, J. M. (2011). Would you follow your own route description? Cognitive strategies in urban route planning. Cognition, 121(2), 228–247. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janzen, G., Schade, M., Katz, S., & Herrmann, T. (2001). Strategies for detour finding in a virtual maze: The role of the visual perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 149–163. doi: 10.1006/jevp.2000.0195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, K., Wüstenberg, T., Jaspers-Feyer, F., Fellbrich, A., & Peters, M. (2006). Sex differences in left/right confusion. Cortex, 42(1), 69–78. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70323-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 246(1), 160–173. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0182-160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klippel, A., & Winter, S. (2005). Structural salience of landmarks for route directions. In A. G. Cohn & D. M. Mark (Eds.), Spatial information theory, volume 3693 of lecture notes in computer science (pp. 347–362). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kuipers, B. (2001). The skeleton in the cognitive map: A computational hypothesis. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium, pp. 10–11.
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, M.-P., Golledge, R. G., & Speigle, J. (1996). Information representation for driver decision support systems. University of California Transportation Center, Working Paper UCTC, 333. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7zz0q3mw
   Google Scholar
• Lawton, C. A. (1994). Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex Roles, 30(11–12), 765–779. doi: 10.1007/BF01544230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton, C. A. (1996). Strategies for indoor wayfinding: The role of orientation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(2), 137–145. doi: 10.1006/jevp.1996.0011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 46, 50–80. doi: 10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipshitz, R., & Strauss, O. (1997). Coping with uncertainty: A naturalistic decision-making analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 149–163. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1997.2679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, R. (1997). Spatial cognition: Geographic environments (Vol. 39). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lovelace, K. L., Hegarty, M., & Montello, D. R. (1999). Elements of good route directions in familiar and unfamiliar environments. In C. Freksa & D. M. Mark (Eds.), Spatial information theory: Cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science (pp. 65–82). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1994). Primer on decision making: How decisions happen. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Maule, A. J., & Svenson, O. (1993). Theoretical and empirical approaches to behavioral decision making and their relation to time constraints. Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making (pp. 3–25). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Michon, P. E., & Denis, M. (2001). When and why are visual landmarks used in giving directions. In D. R. Montello (Ed.), Spatial information theory: Foundations of geographic information science (pp. 292–305). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Millonig, A., & Schechtner, K. (2007). Developing landmark-based pedestrian-navigation systems. Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 8(1), 43–49. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2006.889439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montello, D. R. (2005). Navigation. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 257–294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muir, B. M. (1994). Trust in automation: Part I. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems. Ergonomics, 37, 1905–1922. doi: 10.1080/00140139408964957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M., & Wehner, R. (1988). Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 85(14), 5287–5290. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.14.5287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Münzer, S., & Hölscher, C. (2011). Entwicklung und validierung eines fragebogens zu räumlichen strategien [Development and validation of a questionnaire of spatial strategies]. Diagnostica, 57(3), 111–125. doi: 10.1026/0012-1924/a000040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mychalcewycz, P. (2009). Man follows GPS … to the edge of a cliff. Switched (AOL Tech News). Retrieved from http://www.switched.com/2009/03/25/man-follows-gps-to-the-edge-of-a-cliff/
   Google Scholar
• O'Keefe, J., & Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R., & Singh, I. L. (1993). Performance consequences of automation-induced ‘complacency'. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0301_1
   Google Scholar
• Passini, R. (1980). Wayfinding in complex buildings: An environmental analysis. Man-Environment Systems, 10, 31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Pauzie, A., Daimon, T., Bruyas, M. P., & Trauchessec, R. (1997). How to design landmarks for guidance systems? Mobility for Everyone. 4th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, 2266, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, J. W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational behavior and human performance, 16(2), 366–387. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(76)90022-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pazzaglia, F., Cornoldi, C., & De Beni, R. (2000). Differenze individuali nella rappresentazione dello spazio e nell'abilità di orientamento: Presentazione di un questionario autovalutativo [Individual differences in the representation of space and in the ability to orient: Presentation of a self-report questionnaire]. Giornale italiano di psicologia, 27(3), 627–650.
   Google Scholar
• Pazzaglia, F., & De Beni, R. (2001). Strategies of processing spatial information in survey and landmark-centred individuals. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13(4), 493–508. doi: 10.1080/09541440125778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presson, C. C., & Montello, D. R. (1988). Points of reference in spatial cognition: Stalking the elusive landmark. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6(4), 378–381. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1988.tb01113.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raubal, M., & Winter, S. (2002). Enriching wayfinding instructions with local landmarks. In M. Egenhofer & D. Mark (Eds.), Geographic information science—Second International Conference GIScience 2002, Boulder, CO, USA, September 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2478, pp. 243–259, Springer, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Rehrl, K., Häusler, E., & Leitinger, S. (2010). Comparing the effectiveness of GPS-enhanced voice guidance for pedestrians with metric-and landmark-based instruction sets. Geographic information science (pp. 189–203). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ruddle, R. A., Volkova, E., Mohler, B., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2011). The effect of landmark and body-based sensory information on route knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 39(4), 686–699. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0054-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. A., & Snodgrass, J. (1987). Emotion and the environment. Handbook of Environmental Psychology, 1, 245–280.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, J. A., & Ward, L. M. (1982). Environmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1), 651–689. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.003251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadalla, E. K., & Staplin, L. J. (1980). The perception of traversed distance: Intersections. Environment and Behavior, 12(2), 167–182. doi: 10.1177/0013916580122003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandstrom, N. J., Kaufman, J., & Huettel, S. A. (1998). Males and females use different distal cues in a virtual environment navigation task. Cognitive Brain Research, 6(4), 351–360. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00002-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmid, F., Kuntzsch, C., Winter, S., Kazerani, A., & Preisig, B. (2010). Situated local and global orientation in mobile you-are-here maps. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, ACM, pp. 83–92.
   Google Scholar
• Schroder, C. J., Mackaness, W. A., & Gittings, B. M. (2011). Giving the ‘right’ route directions: The requirements for pedestrian navigation systems. Transactions in GIS, 15(3), 419–438. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2011.01266.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senevirante, P. N., & Morrall, J. F. (1986). Analysis of factors affecting the choice of route pedestrians. Transportation Planning & Technology, 10, 147–159. doi: 10.1080/03081068508717309
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (2004). Orientation and perspective dependence in route and survey learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(1), 158–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sholl, M. J. (1987). Cognitive maps as orienting schemata. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(4), 615–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sholl, M. J., & Egeth, H. E. (1981). Right-left confusion in the adult: A verbal labeling effect. Memory & Cognition, 9(4), 339–350. doi: 10.3758/BF03197558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St George, R., & Nendick, M. (1997). GPS = ‘got position sussed'-Some challenges for engineering and cognitive psychology in the general aviation environment. Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, 1, 81–91.
   Google Scholar
• Steck, S. D., & Mallot, H. A. (2000). The role of global and local landmarks in virtual environment navigation. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(1), 69–83. doi: 10.1162/105474600566628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeter, L. A., Vitello, D., & Wonsiewicz, S. A. (1985). How to tell people where to go: Comparing navigational aids. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22(5), 549–562. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7373(85)80017-1
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, H. A., Brunyé, T. T., & Taylor, S. T. (2008). Spatial mental representation: Implications for navigation system design. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 4(1), 1–40. doi: 10.1518/155723408X342835
   Google Scholar
• Tenbrink, T., Bergmann, E., & Konieczny, L. (2011). Wayfinding and description strategies in an unfamiliar complex building. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1262–1267). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, H. (1983). Noncompensatory decision rules and consumer spatial choice behaviour: A test of predictive ability. The Professional Geographer, 35, 449–485. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1983.00449.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tom, A., & Denis, M. (2003). Referring to landmark or street information in route directions: What difference does it make?. In W. Kuhn, M. F. Worboys & S. Timpf (Eds.), Spatial information theory: Foundations of geographic information science (pp. 384–397). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Trullier, O., Wiener, S. I., Berthoz, A., & Mayer, J. A. (1997). Biologically-based artificial navigation systems: Review and prospects. Progress in Neurobiology, 51, 483–544. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0082(96)00060-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, B., & Lee, P. U. (1999). Pictorial and verbal tools for conveying routes. Spatial information theory. Cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science (pp. 51–64). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vanetti, E. J., & Allen, G. L. (1988). Communicating environmental knowledge the impact of verbal and spatial abilities on the production and comprehension of route directions. Environment and Behavior, 20(6), 667–682. doi: 10.1177/0013916588206001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther-Franks, B. (2007). Augmented reality on handhelds for pedestrian navigation (Unpublished Masters Thesis). Universität Bremen, Bremen.
   Google Scholar
• Wehner, R. (1992). Arthropods. In Animal homing (pp. 45–144). Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar