Sustained attention in language production: An individual differences investigation

REFERENCES

• Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data (Vol. 505). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H. (2011). LanguageR: Data sets and functions with “Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics”. R package version 1.4. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=languageR
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database. (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, J. C. (1996). Computerized assessment of sustained attention: A review of factors affecting vigilance performance. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 18(6), 843–863. doi: 10.1080/01688639608408307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard, J. C. (2001). Assessing attention: Comparison of response-inhibition and traditional continuous performance tests. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (Neuropsychology, Development and Cognition: Section A), 23(3), 331–350. doi: 10.1076/jcen.23.3.331.1188
   Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., & Yap, M. J. (2011). Moving beyond the mean in studies of mental chronometry: The power of response time distributional analyses. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(3), 160–166. doi: 10.1177/0963721411408885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., & Watson, J. M. (2008). Beyond mean response latency: Response time distributional analyses of semantic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 495–523. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2013). Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-2. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
   Google Scholar
• Betts, J., Mckay, J., Maruff, P., & Anderson, V. (2006). The development of sustained attention in children: The effect of age and task load. Child Neuropsychology, 12(3), 205–221. doi: 10.1080/09297040500488522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2012). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.32. Retrieved October 17, 2012, from http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access?. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14(1), 177–208. doi: 10.1080/026432997381664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A. E., & Meyer, A. S. (2008). Capacity demands of phoneme selection in word production: New evidence from dual-task experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(4), 886–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corkum, P. V., & Siegel, L. S. (1993). Is the continuous performance task a valuable research tool for use with children with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder?. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34(7), 1217–1239. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1993.tb01784.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., & Martin, R. C. (1999). Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(2), 345–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, D. R., & Parasuraman, R. (1982). The psychology of vigilance. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duinmeijer, I., de Jong, J., & Scheper, A. (2012). Narrative abilities, memory and attention in children with a specific language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 47(5), 542–555. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00164.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebert, K. D., & Kohnert, K. (2011). Sustained attention in children with primary language impairment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(5), 1372–1384. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0231)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, V. S., & Pashler, H. (2002). Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(6), 1187–1199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finneran, D. A., Francis, A. L., & Leonard, L. B. (2009). Sustained attention in children with specific language impairment (SLI). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(4), 915–929. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/07-0053)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). Automaticity of language production in monologue and dialogue. In A. S. Meyer, L. R. Wheeldon, & A. Krott (Eds.), Automaticity and control in language processing (pp. 1–21). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, Z. M. (2001). Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding. Cognition, 82(1), B1–B14. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00138-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heathcote, A., Brown, S., & Cousineau, D. (2004). QMPE: Estimating lognormal, wald, and weibull RT distributions with a parameter-dependent lower bound. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(2), 277–290. doi: 10.3758/BF03195574
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heathcote, A., Popiel, S. J., & Mewhort, D. (1991). Analysis of response time distributions: An example using the Stroop task. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 340–347. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, L. A., Messer, D. J., & Nash, G. (2012). Executive functioning in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53(1), 37–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02430.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im-Bolter, N., Johnson, J., & Pascual-Leone, J. (2006). Processing limitations in children with specific language impairment: The role of executive function. Child Development, 77(6), 1822–1841. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00976.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korvorst, M., Roelofs, A., & Levelt, W. J. (2006). Incrementality in naming and reading complex numerals: Evidence from eyetracking. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(2), 296–311. doi: 10.1080/17470210500151691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubose, T. T., Bock, K., Dell, G. S., Garnsey, S. M., Kramer, A. F., & Mayhugh, J. (2006). The effects of speech production and speech comprehension on simulated driving performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(1), 43–63. doi: 10.1002/acp.1164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langner, R., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2013). Sustaining attention to simple tasks: A meta-analytic review of the neural mechanisms of vigilant attention. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 870–900. doi: 10.1037/a0030694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, L. B. (1998). Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loher, S., & Roebers, C. M. (2013). Executive functions and their differential contribution to sustained attention in 5-to 8-year-old children. Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 3(1), 51–63. doi: 10.5539/jedp.v3n1p51
   Google Scholar
• Marton, K., Kelmenson, L., & Pinkhasova, M. (2007). Inhibition control and working memory capacity in children with SLI. Psychologia (Ramat-Gan)-An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 50(2), 110–121. doi: 10.2117/psysoc.2007.110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, G., & Davies, D. R. (2001). Individual differences in energetic arousal and sustained attention: A dual-task study. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(4), 575–589. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00162-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuley, T., Yap, M., Christ, S. E., & White, D. A. (2006). Revisiting inhibitory control across the life span: Insights from the ex-Gaussian distribution. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29(3), 447–458. doi: 10.1207/s15326942dn2903_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. S., Roelofs, A., & Levelt, W. J. (2003). Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 131–147. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00509-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. S., Sleiderink, A. M., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1998). Viewing and naming objects: Eye movements during noun phrase production. Cognition, 66(2), B25–B33. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00009-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. S., & Van der Meulen, F. F. (2000). Phonological priming effects on speech onset latencies and viewing times in object naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(2), 314–319. doi: 10.3758/BF03212987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. S., Wheeldon, L. R., Van der Meulen, F. F., & Konopka, A. (2012). Effects of speech rate and practice on the allocation of visual attention in multiple object naming. Frontiers in psychology, 3(39), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, J. W. (2008). Role of auditory attention in the real-time processing of simple grammar by children with specific language impairment: A preliminary investigation. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 43(5), 499–527. doi: 10.1080/13682820701736638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, J. W., Evans, J. L., & Gillam, R. B. (2009). Relation of auditory attention and complex sentence comprehension in children with specific language impairment: A preliminary study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30(01), 123–151. doi: 10.1017/S0142716408090061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, J. W., Magimairaj, B. M., & Finney, M. C. (2010). Working memory and specific language impairment: An update on the relation and perspectives on assessment and treatment. Am J Speech Lang Pathol, 19(1), 78–94. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2009/09-0028)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noterdaeme, M., Amorosa, H., Mildenberger, K., Sitter, S., & Minow, F. (2001). Evaluation of attention problems in children with autism and children with a specific language disorder. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 10(1), 58–66. doi: 10.1007/s007870170048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R. (1979). Memory load and event rate control sensitivity decrements in sustained attention. Science, 205(4409), 924–927. doi: 10.1126/science.472714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., Nestor, P., & Greenwood, P. (1989). Sustained-attention capacity in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 4(3), 339–345. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.4.3.339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 220. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, S. E., & Posner, M. I. (2012). The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 35, 73–89. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piai, V., & Roelofs, A. (2013). Working memory capacity and dual-task interference in picture naming. Acta psychologica, 142(3), 332–342. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13(1), 25–42. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Research on attention networks as a model for the integration of psychological science. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 58, 1–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2008). Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spoken word planning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(6), 1580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A., & Piai, V. (2011). Attention demands of spoken word planning: A review. Frontiers in psychology, 2(307), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2012). Attention, spatial integration, and the tail of response time distributions in Stroop task performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(1), 135–150.
   Google Scholar
• Sarter, M., Givens, B., & Bruno, J. P. (2001). The cognitive neuroscience of sustained attention: Where top-down meets bottom-up. Brain Research Reviews, 35, 146–160. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0173(01)00044-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(1), 86–102. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(90)90011-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• See, J. E., Howe, S. R., Warm, J. S., & Dember, W. N. (1995). Meta-analysis of the sensitivity decrement in vigilance. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 230–249. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepede, G., De Berardis, D., Campanella, D., Perrucci, M. G., Ferretti, A., Serroni, N.,  …  Gambi, F. (2012). Impaired sustained attention in euthymic bipolar disorder patients and non-affected relatives: An fMRI study. Bipolar Disorders, 14(7), 764–779. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severens, E., Van Lommel, S., Ratinckx, E., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2005). Timed picture naming norms for 590 pictures in Dutch. Acta psychologica, 119(2), 159–187. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, Z., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (2012). Sources of individual differences in the speed of naming objects and actions: The contribution of executive control. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(10), 1927–1944. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.670252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaulding, T. J., Plante, E., & Vance, R. (2008). Sustained selective attention skills of preschool children with specific language impairment: Evidence for separate attentional capacities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51(1), 16–34. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/002)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szameitat, A. J., Schubert, T., Müller, K., & Von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). Localization of executive functions in dual-task performance with fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(8), 1184–1199. doi: 10.1162/089892902760807195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., Redick, T. S., Lakey, C. E., & Young, D. L. (2010). Lapses in sustained attention and their relation to executive control and fluid abilities: An individual differences investigation. Intelligence, 38(1), 111–122. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2009.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zandt, T. (2000). How to fit a response time distribution. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 424–465. doi: 10.3758/BF03214357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zomeren, A. H., & Brouwer, W. H. (1992). Assessment of attention. In J. R. Crawford, D. M. Parker, & W. W. McKinlay, (Eds.), A handbook of neuropsychological assessment (pp. 241–266). Hove: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Welford, A. T. (1952). The “psychological refractory period” and the timing of high-speed performance—A review and a theory. [Article]. British Journal of Psychology-General Section, 43, 2–19. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1952.tb00322.x
   Google Scholar