Stimulus–classification and stimulus–action associations: Effects of repetition learning and durability

REFERENCES

• Ashby, F. G., Ennis, J. M., & Spiering, B. J. (2007). A neurobiological theory of automaticity in perceptual categorization. Psychological Review, 114, 632–656. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, T. F., Konkle, T., Alvarez, G. A. & Oliva, A. (2008). Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 14325–14329. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803390105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, S. R., Menzies, L., Hampshire, A., Suckling, J., Fineberg, N. A., del Campo, N., … Sahakian, B. J. (2008). Orbitofrontal dysfunction in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder and their unaffected relatives. Science, 321, 421–422. doi: 10.1126/science.1154433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbins, I. G., Schnyer, D. M., Verfaelle, M., & Schacter, D. L. (2004). Cortical activity reductions during repetition priming can result from rapid response learning. Nature, 428, 316–319. doi: 10.1038/nature02400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, R. N., Eckstein, D., Waszak, F., Frings, C., & Horner, A. J. (2014). Stimulus-response bindings in priming. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 376–384. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner, A. J., & Henson, R. N. (2008). Priming, response learning and repetition suppression. Neuropsychologia, 46, 1979–1991. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.01.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner, A. J., & Henson, R. N. (2009). Bindings between stimuli and multiple response codes dominate long-lag repetition priming in speeded classification tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 35, 757–779. doi: 10.1037/a0015262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, Y. F., & Waszak, F. (2012). Stimulus-classification traces are dominant in response learning. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 86, 262–268. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, I., & Allport, A. (2006). Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching. Memory & Cognition, 34, 433–444. doi: 10.3758/BF03193420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D., & Etherton, J. L. (1994). What is learned during automatization - The role of attention in constructing an instance. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 20, 1022–1050. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moutsopoulou, K., & Waszak, F. (2012). Across-task priming revisited: Response and task conflicts disentangled using ex-gaussian distribution analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 38, 367–374. doi: 10.1037/a0025858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moutsopoulou, K., & Waszak, F. (2013) Durability of classification and action learning: Diffrences revealed using ex-gaussian distribution analysis. Experimental Brain Research. doi:10.1007/s00221-013-3445-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Race, E. A., Badre, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2010). Multiple forms of learning yield temporally distinct electrophysiological repetition effects. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 1726–1738. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Race, E. A., Shanker, S., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Neural priming in human frontal cortex: Multiple forms of learning reduce demands on the prefrontal executive system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(9), 1766–1781. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waszak, F., & Hommel, B. (2007). The costs and benefits of cross-task priming. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1175–1186. doi: 10.3758/BF03193487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361–413. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00520-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wylie, G., & Allport, A. (2000). Task switching and the measurement of “switch costs”. Psychological Research, 63, 212–233. doi: 10.1007/s004269900003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, G., Ghahremani, D. G., & Poldrack, R. A. (2008). Neural substrates for reversing stimulus-outcome and stimulus-response associations. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 11196–11204. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4001-08.2008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar