322
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular articles

Virtual experiments in megastudies: A case study of language and emotion

Pages 1693-1710 | Received 13 Feb 2014, Accepted 24 Oct 2014, Published online: 23 Jan 2015

REFERENCES

  • Baayen, R. H. (2004). Psycholinguistics: A critique of some current gold standards. In: Libben, G., Nault, K. (Eds.), Mental lexicon working papers (pp. 1–45). Edmonton, CA: Mental Lexicon Research Project.
  • Baayen, R. H. (2010). A real experiment is a factorial experiment? The Mental Lexicon, 5(1), 149–157. doi: 10.1075/ml.5.1.06baa
  • Balota, D., Yap, M., Cortese, M., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J., Nelson, D., Simpson, G., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459. doi: 10.3758/BF03193014
  • Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 283–316. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283
  • Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., & Cortese, M. J. (2013). Megastudies: What do millions (or so) of trials tell us about lexical processing? In J. S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (pp. 90–115). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kuˇcera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
  • Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 904–911. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5
  • Cohen, J. (1983). The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7(3), 249–253. doi: 10.1177/014662168300700301
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Oxford: Routledge.
  • Cutler, A. (1981). Making up materials is a confounded nuisance, or: Will we be able to run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990? Cognition, 10, 65–70. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(81)90026-3
  • Diependaele, K., Brysbaert, M., & Neri, P. (2012). How noisy is lexical decision? Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 348.
  • Erdelyi, M. H. (1974). A new look at the new look: Perceptual defense and vigilance. Psychological Review, 81(1), 1–25. doi: 10.1037/h0035852
  • Estes, Z., & Adelman, J. (2008). Automatic vigilance for negative words is categorical and general. Emotion, 8(4), 453–457. doi: 10.1037/a0012887
  • Forster, K. I. (2000). The potential for experimenter bias effects in word recognition experiments. Memory & Cognition, 28(7), 1109–1115. doi: 10.3758/BF03211812
  • Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 681–700. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.681
  • Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., & Richler, J. J. (2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 2–18. doi: 10.1037/a0024338
  • Kessler, B., Treiman, R., & Mullennix, J. (2002). Phonetic biases in voice key response time measurements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 145–171. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2835
  • Keuleers, E., Diependaele, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Practice effects in large-scale visual word recognition studies: A lexical decision study on 14,000 Dutch mono-and disyllabic words and nonwords. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 1–174. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00174
  • Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). The British lexicon project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 287–304. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0118-4
  • Kousta, S., Vinson, D., & Vigliocco, G. (2009). Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition, 112(3), 473–481. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.007
  • Kuperman, V., Estes, Z., Brysbaert, M., & Warriner, A. B. (2014). Emotion and language: Valence and arousal affect word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1065–1081. doi: 10.1037/a0035669
  • Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 978–990. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4
  • Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1990). Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex. Psychological Review, 97(3), 377–395. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.377
  • Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1997). Motivated attention: Affect, activation, and action. In P. J. Lang, R. Simons, & M. T. Balaban (Eds.), Attention and orienting: Sensory and motivational processes (pp. 97–135). Hillsdale, NJ.
  • Larsen, R., Mercer, K., Balota, D., & Strube, M. (2008). Not all negative words slow down lexical decision and naming speed: Importance of word arousal. Emotion, 8(4), 445–452. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.8.4.445
  • Larsen, R. J., Mercer, K. A., & Balota, D. A. (2006). Lexical characteristics of words used in emotional Stroop experiments. Emotion, 6(1), 62–72. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.62
  • MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7, 19–40. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.19
  • Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108(3), 483–522. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.483
  • Pratto, F., & John, O. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 380–391. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.380
  • R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Scott, G. G., O'Donnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C. (2012). Emotion words affect eye fixations during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(3), 783–792.
  • Seidenberg, M., & Waters, G. (1989). Reading words aloud-a mega study. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27(6), 489–489.
  • Sheikh, N. A., & Titone, D. A. (2013). Sensorimotor and linguistic information attenuate emotional word processing benefits: An eye-movement study. Emotion, 13(6), 1107–1121. doi: 10.1037/a0032417
  • Sibley, D. E., Kello, C. T., and Seidenberg, M. S. (2009). Error, error everywhere: A look at megastudies of word reading. Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the cognitive science society, pages 1036–1041.
  • van Heuven, W. J., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., and Brysbaert, M. (2014). Subtlex-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1176–1190. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.850521
  • Vigliocco, G., Clarke, R., Ponari, M., Vinson, D., and Fucci, E. (2013). Feeling visible and invisible words: Emotional processing is modulated by awareness in first and second language. Presented at the 54th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Toronto, Canada.
  • Vinson, D., Ponari, M., & Vigliocco, G. (2014). How does emotional content affect lexical processing? Cognition & Emotion, 28(4), 737–746. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.851068
  • Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1191–1207. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x
  • Yap, M. J., & Seow, C. S. (2014). The influence of emotion on lexical processing: Insights from RT distributional analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(2), 526–533. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0525-x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.