Face-space: A unifying concept in face recognition research

REFERENCES

• Allen, H., Brady, N., & Tredoux, C. (2009). Perception of best likeness' to highly familiar faces of self and friend. Perception, 38, 1821–1830. doi:10.1068/p6424
   Google Scholar
• Anastasi, J. S., & Rhodes, M. G. (2005). An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adults. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 1043–1047. doi:10.3758/BF03206441
   Google Scholar
• Anastasi, J. S., & Rhodes, M. G. (2006). Evidence for an own-age bias in face recognition. North American Journal of Psychology, 8, 237–253.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. D., & Wilson, H. R. (2005). The nature of synthetic face adaptation. Vision Research, 45, 1815–1828. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.012
   Google Scholar
• Angeli, A., Davidoff, J., & Valentine, T. (2008). Face familiarity, distinctiveness and categorical perception. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 690–707. doi:10.1080/17470210701399305
   Google Scholar
• Balas, B. (2012). Bayesian face recognition and perceptual narrowing in face-space. Developmental Science, 15, 579–588. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01154.x
   Google Scholar
• Benson, P. J., & Perrett, D. I. (1991). Perception and recognition of photographic quality facial caricatures: Implications for the recognition of natural images. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 3, 105–135. doi:10.1080/09541449108406222
   Google Scholar
• Benton, C. P., & Burgess, E. C. (2008). The direction of measured face aftereffects. Journal of Vision, 8, 1–1. doi:10.1167/8.15.1
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, M. J., Young, S. G., & Hugenberg, K. (2007). The cross-category effect: Mere social categoirzation is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognition. Psychological Science, 18, 706–712. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01964.x
   Google Scholar
• Blakemore, C., Nachmias, J., & Sutton, P. (1970). The perceived spatial frequency shift: Evidence for frequency selective neurones in the human brain. Journal of Physiology, 210, 727–750. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009238
   Google Scholar
• Blaney, R. L., & Winograd, E. (1978). Developmental differences in children's recognition memory for faces. Developmental Psychology, 14, 441–442. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.14.4.441
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305–327. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, G., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Welling, L. L. M., Conway, C. A., Tiddeman, B. P., & Jones, B. (2006). Visual adaptation to masculine and feminine faces influences generalized preferences and perceptions of trustworthiness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 381–389. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Burton, A. M., & Vokey, J. R. (1998). The face-space typicality paradox: Understanding the face-space metaphor. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 51, 475–483. doi:10.1080/713755768
   Google Scholar
• Burton, N., Jeffery, L., Skinner, A. L., Benton, C. P., & Rhodes, G. (2013). Nine-year-old children use norm-based coding to visually represent facial expression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1261–1269. doi:10.1037/a0031117
   Google Scholar
• Byatt, G., & Rhodes, G. (1998). Recognition of own-race and other-race caricatures: Implications for models of face recognition. Vision Research, 38, 2455–2468. doi:10.3758/BF03196628
   Google Scholar
• Carbon, C. C., & Ditye, T. (2012). Face adaptation effects show strong and long-lasting transfer from lab to more ecological contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 3. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00003
   Google Scholar
• Carbon, C. C., & Leder, H. (2005). Face adaptation: Changing stable representations of familiar faces within minutes? Advances in Experimental Psychology, 1, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Chance, J. E., Turner, A. L., & Goldstein, A. G. (1982). Development of differential recognition for own- and other-race faces. The Journal of Psychology, 112, 29–37. doi:10.1080/00223980.1982.9923531
   Google Scholar
• Cheour, M., Ceponiene, R., Lehtokoski, A., Luuk, A., Allik, J., Alho, K., & Naatanen, R. (1998). Development of language-specific phoneme representations in the infant brain. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 351–353. doi:10.1038/1561
   Google Scholar
• Chiroro, P., & Valentine, T. (1995). An investigation of the contact hypothesis of the own-race bias in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 879–894. doi:10.1080/14640749508401421
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, C. W. G., Wenderoth, P., & Spehar, B. (2000). A functional angle on adaptation in cortical vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 267, 1705–1710. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1198
   Google Scholar
• Craw, I. (1995). A manifold model of face and object recognition. In T. Valentine (Ed.), Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Face Recognition (pp. 183–203). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, G., Ellis, H., & Shepherd, J. (1977). Cue saliency in faces as assessed by the “photofit” technique. Perception, 6, 263–269. doi:10.1068/p060263
   Google Scholar
• Davies, G., & Valentine, T. (2007). Facial composites: Forensic utility and psychological research. In R. C. L. Lindsay, D. F. Ross, J. D. Read & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology. Volume 2: Memory for people (pp. 59–83). Mahwah: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Dempster, F. N. (1981). Memory span: Sources of individual and developmental differences. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 63–100. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.89.1.63
   Google Scholar
• Dennett, H. W., McKone, E., Edwards, M., & Susilo, T. (2012). Face aftereffects predict individual differences in face recognition ability. Psychological Science, 23, 1279–1287. doi:10.1177/0956797612446350
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107–117. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.2.107
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, H. D. (1975). Recognizing faces. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 409–426. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01477.x
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, H. D., Deregowski, J. B., & Shepherd, J. W. (1975). Descriptions of white and black faces by white and black subjects. International Journal of Psychology, 10, 119–123. doi:10.1080/00207597508247325
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, H. D., & Flin, R. (1990). Encoding and storage effects in 7-year-olds' and 10-year-olds' memory for faces. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 77–92. doi:10.1111/j.2044–835X.1990.tb00823.x
   Google Scholar
• Feinman, S., & Entwisle, D. R. (1976). Children's ability to recognize other children's faces. Child Development, 47, 506–510. doi:10.2307/1128809
   Google Scholar
• Frowd, C. D. (2015). Facial composite systems. In T. Valentine & J. P. Davis (Eds.), Forensic facial identification: Theory and practice of identification from eyewitnesses, composites and CCTV (pp. 43–70). Chicester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A. (1996a). Recall of rapidly present random chess positions is a function of skill. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 159–163. doi:10.3758/BF03212414
   Google Scholar
• Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A. (1996b). Templates in chess memory: A mechanism for recalling several boards. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 1–40. doi:10.1006/cogp.1996.0011
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, D., & Homa, D. (1977). Integrative and metric properties of abstracted information as a function of category discriminability, instance variability and experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 3, 375–385. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.3.4.375
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, A. G. (1975). Recognition of inverted photographs of faces in children and adults. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 127, 109–123. doi:10.1080/00221325.1975.10532361
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1964). Recognition of children's faces. Child Development, 35, 129–136. doi:10.2307/1126577
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1980). Memory for faces and schema theory. Journal of Psychology, 105, 47–59. doi:10.1080/00223980.1980.9915131
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. J., & Little, A. (2011). Adaptation may cause some of the face caricature effect. Perception, 40, 317–322. doi:10.1068/p6865.
   Google Scholar
• de Heering, A., Rossion, B., & Maurer, D. (2012). Developmental changes in face recognition during childhood: Evidence from upright and inverted faces. Cognitive Development, 27, 17–27. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2011.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Hills, P. J. (2012). A developmental study of the own-age face recognition bias in children. Developmental psychology, 48(2), 499–508. doi:10.1037/a0026524
   Google Scholar
• Hills, P. J. (2014). The development of face recognition: Experimental evidence for maturation. In R. Chen (Ed.), Cognitive Development: Theories, Stages & Processes and Challenges (pp. 145–188). Nova-Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hills, P. J., Holland, A. M., & Lewis, M. B. (2010). Aftereffects for face attributes with different natural variability: Children are more adaptable than adolescents. Cognitive Development, 25, 278–289. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Hills, P. J., & Lewis, M. B. (2006). Reducing the own-race bias in face recognition by shifting attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 996–1002. doi:10.1080/17470210600654750
   Google Scholar
• Hills, P. J., & Lewis, M. B. (2011). Reducing the own-race bias in face recognition by attentional shift using fixation crosses preceding the lower half of a face. Visual Cognition, 19, 313–339. doi:10.1080/13506285.2010.528250
   Google Scholar
• Hills, P. J., & Lewis, M. B. (2012). FIAEs in famous faces are mediated by type of processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article no. 256. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00256
   Google Scholar
• Hills, P. J., & Pake, J. M. (2013). Eye-tracking the own-race bias in face recognition: Revealing the perceptual and socio-cognitive mechanisms. Cognition, 129(3), 586–597. doi:10.1016.j.cognition.2013.08.012
   Google Scholar
• Hulbert, A. (2001). Trading faces. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 3–5. doi:10.1038/82877
   Google Scholar
• Jaquet, E., & Rhodes, G. (2008). Face aftereffects indicate dissociable, but not distinct, coding of male and female faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 101–112. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.101
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, L., & Rhodes, G. (2011). Insights into the development of face recognition mechanisms revealed by face after effects. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 799–815. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02066.x
   Google Scholar
• Jeffery, L., Rhodes, G., & Busey, T. (2006). View-specific coding of face shape. Psychological Science, 17, 501–505. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01735.x
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, F., Blanz, V., & O'Toole, A. (2007). The role of familiarity in three-dimensional view-transferability of face identity adaptation. Vision Research, 47, 525–531. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.10.012
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. H., & Vecera, S. P. (1996). Cortical differentiation and neurocognitive development: The parcellation conjecture. Behavioural Processes, 36, 195–212. doi:10.1016/0376-6357(95)00028-3
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. A., & Ellis, H. D. (1995). Age effects in the processing of typical and distinctive faces. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 48, 447–465. doi:10.1080/14640749508401399
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, J. M., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2008). Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces. Brain Research, 1228, 177–188. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.092
   Google Scholar
• Knowlton, B. J., & Squire, L. R. (1993). The learning of categories: Parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge. Science, 262, 1747–1749. doi:10.1126/science.8259522
   Google Scholar
• Komes, J., Schweinberger, S. R., & Wiese, H. (2014). Preserved fine-tuning of face perception and memory: Evidence from the own-race bias in high-and low-performing older adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, Article no. 60. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00060
   Google Scholar
• Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. N., & Lindblom, B. (1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science, 255, 606–608. doi:10.1126/science.1736364
   Google Scholar
• Langlois, J., & Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1, 115–121. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00079.x
   Google Scholar
• Laurence, S., & Hole, G. (2012). Identity specific adaptation with composite faces. Visual Cognition, 20, 109–120. doi:10.1080/13506285.2012.655805
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. J., & Perrett, D. (1997). Presentation-time measures of the effects of manipulations in colour space on discrimination of famous faces. Perception, 26, 733–752. doi:10.1068/p260733
   Google Scholar
• Leopold, D. A., Bondar, I. V., & Giese, M. A. (2006). Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nature, 442, 572–575. doi:10.1038/nature04951
   Google Scholar
• Leopold, D. A., O'Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., & Blanz, V. (2001). Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level after effects. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 89–94. doi:10.1038/82947
   Google Scholar
• Leopold, D. A., Rhodes, G., Müller, K., & Jeffery, L. (2005). The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 272, 897–904. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.3022
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. B., & Johnston, R. A. (1999). Are caricatures special? evidence of peak shift in face recognition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 105–117. doi:10.1080/713752302
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. B. (2004). Face-space-R: Towards a unified account of face recognition. Visual Cognition, 11, 29–69. doi:10.1080/13506280344000194
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. B., & Ellis, H. D. (2000). Satiation in name and face recognition. Memory & Cognition, 28, 783–788. doi:10.3758/BF03198413
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. B., & Johnston, R. A. (1998). Understanding caricatures of faces. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 51, 321–346. doi:10.1080/713755758
   Google Scholar
• Lewkowicz, D. J., & Ghazanfar, A. A. (2006). The decline of cross-species intersensory perception in human infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 6771–6774. doi:10.1073/pnas.0602027103
   Google Scholar
• Light, L. L., Kayra-Stuart, F., Hollander, S. (1979). Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 212–228. doi:10.1037/0278–7393.5.3.212
   Google Scholar
• List, J. (1986). Age and schematic differences in the reliability of eye-witness testimony. Developmental Psychology, 22, 50–57. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.22.1.50
   Google Scholar
• Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., & Waitt, C. (2008). Category contingent aftereffects for faces of different races, ages and species. Cognition, 106(3), 1537–1547. doi:10.1016./j.cognition/.2007.06.008
   Google Scholar
• Loffler, G., Yourganov, G., Wilkinson, F., Wilson, H. R. (2005). fMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1386–1391. doi:10.1038/nn1538
   Google Scholar
• Macchi-Cassia, V., Kuefner, D., Westerlund, A., & Nelson, C. A. (2006). A behavioural and ERP investigation of 3-month-olds' face preferences. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2113–2125. doi:10.1016/j/neuropsychologia.2005.11.014
   Google Scholar
• Mather, G. (1980). The movement aftereffect and a distributed-shift model for coding the direction of visual movement. Perception, 9, 379–392. doi:10.1068/p090379
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, I. P. L. (1997). Categorisation and perceptual learning: An analogue of the face inversion effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 257–273. doi:10.1080/713755705
   Google Scholar
• Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207–238. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.3.207
   Google Scholar
• Mondloch, C. J., & Thomson, K. (2008). Limitations in 4-year-old children's sensitivity to the spacing among facial features. Child Development, 79, 1513–1523. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01202.x
   Google Scholar
• Morton, J. (1979). Word recognition. In J. Morton & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Psycholinguistic Series, 2: Structures and Processes (pp. 107–156). London: Elek.
   Google Scholar
• Mundy, M. E., Honey, R. C., & Dwyer, D. M. (2007). Simultaneous presentation of similar stimuli produces perceptual learning in human picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 124–138. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.33.2.124
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, C. A. (2001). The development and neural bases in face recognition. Infant and Child Development, 10, 3–18. doi:10.1002/icd.239
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. (1981). Social cognition in a script framework. In J. H. Flavell & L. Ross (Eds.), Social cognitive development: Frontiers and possible futures (pp. 97–118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. (1996). Language in Cognitive Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nishimura, M., Maurer, D., & Gao, X. (2009). Exploring children's face-space: A multidimensional scaling analysis of the mental representation of facial identity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(3), 355–375. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.02.005
   Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39–57. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.39
   Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M. (1988). Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 700–708. doi:10.1037/0278–7393.14.4.700
   Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M. (1991). Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 3–27. doi:10.1037/0096–1523.17.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M., & Zaki, S. R. (2003). A hybrid-similarity exemplar model for predicting distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1194–1209. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1194
   Google Scholar
• O'Toole, A. J., Abdi, H. Deffenbacher, K. A., & Valentin, D. (1995). A perceptual learning theory of the information in faces. In T. Valentine (Ed.), Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Face Recognition: Explorations in Face Space (pp. 159–182). London: Roultledge.
   Google Scholar
• Over, R. (1971). Comparison of normalization theory and neural enhancement explanation of negative after effects. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 225–243. doi:10.1037/h0030798
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, S. E. (1975). Visual perception and world knowledge: Notes on a model of sensory-cognitive interaction. In D. A. Norman, D. E. Rumelhart & LNR Research Group. Explorations in Cognition (pp. 278–307). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Papesh, M. H., & Goldinger, S. D. (2010). A multidimensional scaling analysis of own- and cross-race face spaces. Cognition, 116, 283–288. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Pascalis, O., de Haan, M., & Nelson, C. A. (2002). Is face processing species-specific during the first year of life? Science, 296, 1321–1323. doi:10.1126/science.1070223
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. (1975). A definition of caricature and caricature and recognition. Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communications, 2, 1–24. doi: 10.1525/var.1975.2.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Perrett, D. I., May, K. A., & Yoshikawa, S. (1994). Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature, 368, 239–242. doi:10.1038/368239a0
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pond, S., Kloth, N., McKone, E., Jeffery, L., Irons, J., & Rhodes, G. (2013). Aftereffects support opponent coding of face gender. Journal of Vision, 13, Article no. 16. doi:10.1167/13.14.16
   Google Scholar
• Pourtois, G., Schwartz, S., Seghier, M. L., Lazeyras, F., & Vullieumier, P. (2005). Portraits or people?. Distinct representations of face identity in the human visual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1043–1057. doi:10.1162/0898929054475181
   Google Scholar
• Reed, S. K. (1972). Pattern recognition and categorization. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 382–407. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90014-X
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, G., Brennan, S., & Carey, S. (1987). Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces. Cognitive psychology, 19(4), 473–497. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(87)90016-8
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, G., & Jeffery, L. (2006). Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity. Vision Research, 46, 2977–2987. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Watson, T. L., Clifford, C. W. G., & Nakayama, K. (2003). Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness after effects. Psychological Science, 14, 558–566. doi:10.1046/j.0956–7976.2003.psci_1465.x
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, R., McKone, E., & Edwards, M. (2007). After effects for face attributes with different natural variability: Adapter position effects and neural models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 570–592. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.570
   Google Scholar
• Rose, S. A., Jankowski, J. J., & Feldman, J. F. (2002). Speed of processing and face recognition at 7 and 12 months. Infancy, 3(4), 435–455. doi:10.1207/S15327078IN0304_02
   Google Scholar
• Ross, D. A., Deroche, M., & Palmeri, T. J. (2014). Not just the norm: Exemplar-based models also predict face aftereffects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(1), 47–70. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0449-5
   Google Scholar
• Ross, D. A., Hancock, P. J., & Lewis, M. B. (2010). Changing faces: Direction is important. Visual Cognition, 18(1), 67–81. doi:10.1080/13506280802536656
   Google Scholar
• Ryu, J., & Chaudhuri, A. (2006). Representations of familiar and unfamiliar faces as revealed by viewpoint after-effects. Vision Research, 46, 4059–4063. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.07.018
   Google Scholar
• Saarinen, J., & Levi, D. M. (1995). Perceptual learning in vernier acuity: What is learned? Vision Research, 35, 519–527. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)00141-8
   Google Scholar
• Scott, L. S., Shannon, R. W., & Nelson, C. A. (2005). Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of species-specific face processing. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 405–416. doi:10.3758/CABN.5.4.405
   Google Scholar
• Scott, L. S., Shannon, R. W., & Nelson, C. A. (2006). Neural correlates of human and monkey face processing in 9-month-old infants. Infancy, 10, 171–186. doi:10.1207/s15327078in1002_4
   Google Scholar
• Short, L. A., Hatry, A. J., & Mondloch, C. J. (2011). The development of norm-based coding and race-specific face prototypes: An examination of 5-and 8-year-olds' face space. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(2), 338–357. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2010.07.007
   Google Scholar
• Slone, A. E., Brigham, J. C., & Meissner, C. A. (2000). Social and cognitive factors affecting the own-race bias in whites. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 71–84. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2202_1
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, C., Gibson, S., & Maylin, M. (2012). EFIT-V: Evolutionary algorithms and computer composites. In C. Wilkinson & C. Ryan (Eds.), Craniofacial identification (pp. 24–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solso, R., & McCarthy, J. (1981). Prototype formation of faces: A case of pseudomemory. British Journal of Psychology, 72, 499–503. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1981.tb01779.x
   Google Scholar
• Sporer, S. L. (2001). Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups—An integration of theories. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 36–97. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.36
   Google Scholar
• Strobach, T., & Carbon, C. C. (2013). Face adaptation effects: Reviewing the impact of adapting information, time, and transfer. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article no. 318. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00318
   Google Scholar
• Tredoux, C. (2002). A direct measure of facial similarity and its relation to human similarity perceptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 180–193. doi:10.1037/1076–898X.8.3.180
   Google Scholar
• Tulving, E., & Thompson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352–373. doi:10.1037/h0020071
   Google Scholar
• Turk, M. and Pentland, A. (1991). Eigenfaces for recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 71–86. doi:10.1162/jocn.1991.3.1.71
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327–352. doi:10.1037/0033–295X.84.4.327
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, T. (1986). Encoding processes in face recognition. Unpublished PhD thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, T. (1991a). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161–204. doi:10.1080/14640749108400966
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, T. (1991b). Representation and process in face recognition. In R. Watt (Ed.), Pattern recognition by man and machine. (Vol. 14 in “Vision and Visual Dysfunction” series edited by J. Cronly-Dillon) (pp. 107–124). London: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, T. (2001). Face-space models of face recognition. In M. J. Wenger & J. T. Townsend (Eds.), Computational, geometric, and process perspectives on facial cognition: Contexts and challenges (pp. 83–113). Mahwah: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. (1986a). The effects of distinctiveness in recognizing and classifying faces. Perception, 15, 525–535. doi:10.1068/p150525
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. (1986b). Recognizing familiar faces: The role of distinctiveness and familiarity. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 300–305. doi:10.1037/h0080101
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, T., Darling, S., & Donnelly, M. (2004). Why are average faces attractive? The effect of view and averageness on the attractiveness of female faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 482–487. doi:10.3758/BF03196599
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, T., & Endo, M. (1992). Towards an exemplar model of face processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 671–703. doi:10.1080/14640749208401305
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, T., Hughes, C., & Munro, R. (2009). Recent developments in eyewitness identification procedures in the United Kingdom. In R. Bull, T. Valentine, & T. Williamson (Eds.), The handbook of psychology of investigative interviewing (pp. 221–240). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, T., & Zarkadi, T. (2012). Testing a new technique for creating lineups for suspects with distinguishing marks. Poster presented to the 24th Annual Convention of the Association for Psychological Science, Chicago, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, M. A., Kaping, D., Mizokami, Y., & Duhamel, P. (2004). Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature, 428, 557–561. doi:10.1038/nature02420
   Google Scholar
• Webster, M. A., & MacLeod, D. I. A. (2011). Visual adaptation and face perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, 366, 1702–1725. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0360
   Google Scholar
• Webster, M. A., & MacLin, O. H. (1999). Figural after effects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 647–653. doi:10.3758/BF03212974
   Google Scholar
• Wiese, H., Komes, J., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2012). Daily-life contact affects the own-age bias and neural correlates of face memory in elderly participants. Neuropsychologia, 50, 3496–3508. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.022
   Google Scholar
• Wincenciak, J., Dzhelyova, M., Perrett, D. I., & Barraclough, N. E. (2013). Adaptation to facial trustworthiness is different in female and male observers. Vision research, 87, 30–34. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2013.05.007
   Google Scholar
• Winograd, E. (1981). Elaboration and distinctiveness in memory for faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Learning and Memory, 7, 181–190. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.7.3.181
   Google Scholar
• Wright, D. B., & Sladden, B. (2003). An own gender bias and the importance of hair in face recognition. Acta psychologica, 114, 101–114. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(03)00052-0
   Google Scholar
• Yamashita, J. A., Hardy, J. L., De Valois, K. K., & Webster, M. A. (2005). Stimulus selectivity of figural after effects for faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 420–437. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.3.420
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141–145. doi:10.1037/h0027474
   Google Scholar
• Zarkadi, T., Wade, K. A., & Stewart, N. (2009). Creating fair lineups for suspects with distinctive features. Psychological Science, 20, 1448–1453. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02463.x
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, C. (2011). Neural mechanisms of face and orientation aftereffects. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, C., Hancock, P. J., & Bednar, J. A. (2008). Modelling face adaptation aftereffects. Perception, 37, ECVP Abstract Supplement, 158. doi:10.1068/v080567
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, L., & Chubb, C. (2001). The size-tuning of the face-distortion after-effect. Vision Research, 41, 2979–2994. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00202-4
   Google Scholar