Identity-level representations affect unfamiliar face matching performance in sequential but not simultaneous tasks

REFERENCES

• Beveridge, J. R., Phillips, P. J., Givens, G. H., Draper, B. A., Teli, M. N., & Bolme, D. S. (2011). When high-quality face images match poorly. In IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition and Workshops (FG 2011), 572–578.
   Google Scholar
• Bindemann, M., Jenkins, R., & Burton, A. M. (2007). A bottleneck in face identification: Repetition priming from flanker images. Experimental Psychology, 54(3), 192–201. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.54.3.192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bindemann, M., & Sandford, A. (2011). Me, myself, and I: Different recognition rates for three photo-IDs of the same person. Perception, 40(5), 625–627. doi: 10.1068/p7008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, V. (1982). Changing faces: Visual and non-visual coding processes in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 105–116. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1982.tb01795.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, V. (1994). Stability from variation: The case of face recognition. The M.D. Vernon memorial lecture. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(1), 5–28. doi: 10.1080/14640749408401141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, V., Henderson, Z., Newman, C., & Burton, A. M. (2001). Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(3), 207–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77(3), 305–327. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruck, M., Cavanagh, P., & Ceci, S. (1991). Fortysomething: Recognizing faces at one's 25th reunion. Memory & Cognition, 19(3), 221–228. doi: 10.3758/BF03211146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, A. M. (2013). Why has research in face recognition progressed so slowly? The importance of variability. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(8), 1467–1485. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.800125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., & Hancock, P. J. B. (1999). From pixels to people: A model of familiar face recognition. Cognitive Science, 23(1), 1–31. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2301_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., & Johnston, R. A. (1990). Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model. British Journal of Psychology, 81(3), 361–380. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02367.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, A. M., Jenkins, R., Hancock, P. J. B., & White, D. (2005). Robust representations for face recognition: The power of averages. Cognitive Psychology, 51(3), 256–284. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, A. M., Jenkins, R., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2011). Mental representations of familiar faces. British Journal of Psychology, 102(4), 943–958. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02039.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, A. M., White, D., & McNeill, A. (2010). The Glasgow face matching test. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 286–291. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.1.286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clutterbuck, R., & Johnston, R. A. (2002). Exploring levels of face familiarity by using an indirect face-matching measure. Perception, 31(8), 985–994. doi: 10.1068/p3335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clutterbuck, R., & Johnston, R. A. (2004). Matching as an index of face familiarity. Visual Cognition, 11(7), 857–869. doi: 10.1080/13506280444000021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clutterbuck, R., & Johnston, R. A. (2005). Demonstrating how unfamiliar faces become familiar using a face matching task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17(1), 97–116. doi: 10.1080/09541440340000439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. J., Bruce, V., & Burton, A. M. (2000). Recognition of unfamiliar faces. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(9), 330–337. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01519-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H., Claes, P., Corcoran, M., Walters, M., Johnston, A., & Clement, J. G. (2011). How different is different? Criterion and sensitivity in face-space. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00041
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jenkins, R., White, D., Van Montfort, X., & Burton, A. M. (2011). Variability in photos of the same face. Cognition, 121, 313–323. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, P., Hall, L., Sikström, S., & Olsson, A. (2005). Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task. Science, 310(5745), 116–119. doi: 10.1126/science.1111709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., Towell, N., & Pike, G. (1997). When seeing should not be believing: Photographs, credit cards and fraud. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11(3), 211–222. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199706)11:3<211::AID-ACP430>3.0.CO;2-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lander, K., & Bruce, V. (2000). Recognizing famous faces: Exploring the benefits of facial motion. Ecological Psychology, 12(4), 259–272. doi: 10.1207/S15326969ECO1204_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, D., & Greer, J. (2011). Getting to know you: From view-dependent to view-invariant repetition priming for unfamiliar faces. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(2), 217–223. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.541266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megreya, A. M., & Burton, A. M. (2006). Unfamiliar faces are not faces: Evidence from a matching task. Memory & Cognition, 34(4), 865–876. doi: 10.3758/BF03193433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megreya, A. M., & Burton, A. M. (2008). Matching faces to photographs: Poor performance in eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14(4), 364–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megreya, A. M., White, D., & Burton, A. M. (2011). The other-race effect does not rely on memory: Evidence from a matching task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(8), 1473–1483. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.575228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, C. D., & Stevenage, S. V. (2008). Internal feature saliency as a marker of familiarity and configural processing. Visual Cognition, 16(1), 23–43. doi: 10.1080/13506280701238073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(1), 137–149. doi: 10.3758/BF03207704
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanaka, J., Giles, M., Kremen, S., & Simon, V. (1998). Mapping attractor fields in face space: The atypicality bias in face recognition. Cognition, 68(3), 199–219. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00048-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, D., Burton, A. M., Jenkins, R., & Kemp, R. I. (2014). Redesigning photo-ID to improve unfamiliar face matching performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20(2), 166–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar