The construction of spatial mental models—A new view on the continuity effect

REFERENCES

• Baguley, T. S., & Payne, S. J. (2000). Long-term memory for spatial and temporal mental models includes construction processes and model structure. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 479–512. doi: 10.1080/713755888
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, L., & Nejasmic, J. (2012). Relocating multiple objects during belief revision. In C. Stachniss, K. Schill, & D. Uttal (Eds.), Lecture notes in artificial intelligence: Spatial cognition (pp. 476–491). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, R. M. J., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1989). Spatial reasoning. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(5), 564–575. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90013-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., & Santamaria, C. (1997). Reasoning about relations: Spatial and non-spatial problems. Thinking and Reasoning, 3, 191–208. doi: 10.1080/135467897394347
   Google Scholar
• Chan, T. T., & Bergen, B. (2005). Writing direction influences spatial cognition. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 412–417). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1969). Influence of language on solving three-term series problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 205–215. doi: 10.1037/h0028153
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Craik, K. J. W. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Soto, C. B., London, M., & Handel, S. (1965). Social reasoning and spatial paralogic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 513–521. doi: 10.1037/h0022492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1982). Spatial descriptions and referential continuity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 296–306. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90626-0
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T., Newstead, S. E., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1993). Human reasoning. The psychology of deduction. Hove (UK): Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ferstl, E. C. (2010). The neuroanatomy of discourse comprehension: Where are we now?. In V. Bambini (Eds.). Neuropragmatics, Special Issue of Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22, 61–88.
   Google Scholar
• Ferstl, E. C., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). Sprachverstehen im Kontext: Bildgebende Studien zu Kohärenzbildung und Pragmatik. Sprache - Stimme - Gehör, 29, 130–138. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-873120
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. D., Fodor, J. A., & Garrett, M. F. (1975). The psychological unreality of semantic representations. Linguistic Inquiry, 4, 515–531.
   Google Scholar
• Foos, P. W., Smith, K. H., Sabol, M. A., & Mynatt, B. T. (1976). Constructive processes in simple linear-order problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2(6), 759–766. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.2.6.759
   Google Scholar
• Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1982). Referential continuity and the coherence of discourse. Cognition, 11(1), 29–46. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(82)90003-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel, V., & Dolan, R. J. (2001). Functional neuroanatomy of three-term relational reasoning. Neuropsychologia, 39, 901–909. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00024-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, G. P., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2005). Reasoning about relations. Psychological Review, 112, 468–493. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.2.468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosz, B. J., Joshi, A. K., & Weinstein, S. (1995). Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2), 202–225.
   Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304, 438–441. doi: 10.1126/science.1095455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P., & van Berkum, J. (2007). Beyond the sentence given. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362, 801–811. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halford, G. S., Phillips, S., Wilson, W. H., McCredden, J. E., Andrews, G., Birney, D. P., Baker, R., & Bain, J. D. (2007). Relational processing is fundamental to the central executive and it is limited to four variables. In N. Osaka, R. Logie & M. D'Esposito (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of working memory (pp. 261–280). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., & Phillips, S. (1998). Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 803–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., & Phillips, S. (2010). Relational knowledge: The foundation of higher cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 497–505. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haviland, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1974). What’s new?. Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(5), 512–521. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80003-4
   Google Scholar
• Hitch, G. (1980). Developing the concept of working memory. In: Claxton, G. (Eds.), Cognitive psychology: New directions (pp. 154–196). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Hörnig, R., Oberauer, K., & Weidenfeld, A. (2006). Between reasoning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(10), 1805–1825. doi:10.1080/17470210500416151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huttenlocher, J. (1968). Constructing spatial images: A strategy in reasoning. Psychological Review, 75, 550–560. doi: 10.1037/h0026748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972). The three-term series problem. Cognition, 1, 57–82. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(72)90045-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2001). Mental models and deduction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 434–442. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01751-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. (1991). Deduction. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122–149. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Klauer, K. C., Stegmaier, R., & Meiser, T. (1997). Working memory involvement in propositional and spatial reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 3(1), 9–47. doi: 10.1080/135467897394419
   Google Scholar
• Knauff, M. (1999). The cognitive adequacy of Allen's interval calculus for qualitative spatial representation and reasoning. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 1, 261–290. doi: 10.1023/A:1010097601575
   Google Scholar
• Knauff, M. (2006). Deduktion und logisches Denken. In J. Funke (Eds.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Themenbereich C, Serie II, Band 8, Denken und Problemlösen (pp. 167–264). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Knauff, M. (2013). Space to reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knauff, M., Rauh, R., & Schlieder, C. (1995). Preferred mental models in qualitative spatial reasoning: A cognitive assessment of Allen's calculus. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 200–205). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Knauff, M., Rauh, R., Schlieder, C., & Strube, G. (1998). Continuity Effect and Figural Bias in Spatial Relational Inference. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 573–578). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Krumnack, A., Bucher, L., Nejasmic, J., & Knauff, M. (2010). Spatial reasoning as verbal reasoning. In S. Ohlsson, & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32^nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1002–1007). Austin, TX, US: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Krumnack, A., Bucher, L., Nejasmic, J., Nebel, B., & Knauff, M. (2011). A model for relational reasoning as verbal reasoning. Cognitive Systems Research, 11, 377–392. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2010.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mähler, C., & Schuchardt, K. (2012). Die Bedeutung der Funktionstüchtigkeit des Arbeitsgedächtnisses für die Differentialdiagnostik von Lernstörungen. In M. Hasselhorn & C. Zoelch (Eds.), Funktionsdiagnostik des Arbeitsgedächtnisses (pp. 59–76). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Maybery, M. T., Bain, J. D., & Halford, G. S. (1986). Information-processing demands of transitive inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 600–613.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97. doi: 10.1037/h0043158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1980). Task difficulty, resources, and dual-task performance. In R. S. Nickerson (Eds.), Attention and performance VIII, (pp. 297–315). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Nejasmic, J., Bucher, L., Thorn, P. D., & Knauff, M. (2014). Construction and revision of spatial mental models under high task demand. In P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane & B. Scassellati (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36^th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1066–1071). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J. V., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1984). Representation of spatial descriptions in working memory. Current Psychological Research and Reviews, 3(1), 52–62. doi: 10.1007/BF02686532
   Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K., Hörnig, R., Weidenfeld, A., & Wilhelm, O. (2005). Effects of directionality in deductive reasoning: II. Premise integration and conclusion evaluation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A(7), 1225–1247. http://web.ebscohost.com. doi:10.1080/02724980443000566.
   Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K., & Wilhelm, O. (2000). Effects of directionality in deductive reasoning: I. The comprehension of single relational premises. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1702–1712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, S., & Niki, K. (2002). Separating relational from item load effects in paired recognition: Temporoparietal and middle frontal gyral activity with increased associates, but not items during encoding and retention. Neuroimage, 17, 1031–1055. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polk, T. A., & Newell, A. (1995). Deduction as verbal reasoning. Psychological Review, 102, 533–566. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts, G. R. (1972). Information processing strategies used in the encoding of linear orderings. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 727–740. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80007-0
   Google Scholar
• Potts, G. R., & Scholz, K. W. (1975). The internal representation of a three-term series problem. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 439–451. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80023-5
   Google Scholar
• Prado, J., Chadha, A., & Booth, J. R. (2011). The brain network for deductive reasoning: A quantitative meta-analysis of 28 neuroimaging studies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 3483–3497. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prado, J., Van Der Henst, J.-B., & Noveck, I. (2008). Spatial associations in relational reasoning: Evidence for a SNARC-like effect. The Quaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1143–1150. doi: 10.1080/17470210801954777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragni, M., Fangmeier, T., Webber, L., & Knauff, M. (2006). Complexity in spatial reasoning. In R. Sun, & N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28^th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1986–1991). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ragni, M., & Knauff, M. (2013). A theory and a computational model of spatial reasoning with preferred mental models. Psychological Review, 120, 561–588. doi: 10.1037/a0032460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragni, M., Knauff, M., & Nebel, B. (2005). A Computational Model for Spatial Reasoning with Mental Models. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1797–1802). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rauh, R., Hagen, C., Kuss, T., Knauff, M., Schlieder, C., & Strube, G. (2005). Preferred and alternative mental models in spatial reasoning. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5(2&3), 239–269. doi: 10.1080/13875868.2005.9683805
   Google Scholar
• Rauh, R., Schlieder, C., & Knauff, M. (1997). Präferierte mentale Modelle beim räumlich-relationalen Schließen: Empirie und kognitive Modellierung. Kognitionswissenschaft, 6, 21–34. doi: 10.1007/s001970050027
   Google Scholar
• Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (2005). Memory-based approaches and beyond. Discourse Processes, 39(2–3), 205–224. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaeken, W., Girotto, V., & Johnson Laird, P. N. (1998). The effect of an irrelevant premise on temporal and spatial reasoning. Kognitionswissenschaft, 7, 27–32. doi: 10.1007/s001970050047
   Google Scholar
• Schaeken, W., Van der Henst, J. B., & Schroyens, W. (2007). The mental models theory of relational reasoning: Premises' relevance, conclusions' paraphrasing, and cognitive economy. In W. Schaeken, A. Vandierendonck, W. Schroyens, & G. d'Ydewalle (Eds.), The mental models theory of reasoning: Refinements and extensions (pp. 129–150). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. H., & Foos, P. W. (1975). Effect of presentation order on the construction of linear orders. Memory & Cognition, 3(6), 614–618. doi: 10.3758/BF03198226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spalek, T. M., & Hammad, S. (2005). The left-to-right bias in inhibition of return is due to the direction of reading. Psychological Science, 16, 15–18. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00774.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandierendonck, A., & De Vooght, G. (1997). Working memory constraints on linear reasoning with spatial and temporal contents. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 803–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandierendonck, A., Dierckx, V., & De Vooght, G. (2004). Mental model construction in linear reasoning: Evidence for the construction of initial annotated models. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 1369–1391. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar