The role of numerical and non-numerical cues in nonsymbolic number processing: Evidence from the line bisection task

REFERENCES

• Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1980). Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia, 18, 491–498. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(80)90151-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, J. L., Bradshaw, J. A., Nathan, G., Nettleton, N. C., & Wilson, L. E. (1986). Leftwards error in bisecting the gap between two points: Stimulus quality and hand effects. Neuropsychologia, 24, 849–855. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(86)90084-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannon, E. M., Abbott, S., & Lutz, D. J. (2004). Number bias for the discrimination of large visual sets in infancy. Cognition, 86, 201–221. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.004
   Google Scholar
• Brannon, E. M., Lutz, D., & Cordes, S. (2006). The development of area discrimination and its implications for number representation in infancy. Developmental Science, 9, F59–F64. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00530.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabria, M., & Rossetti, Y. (2005). Interference between number processing and line bisection: A methodology. Neuropsychologia, 43, 779–783. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.06.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantlon, J. F., & Brannon, E. M. (2006). Shared system for ordering small and large numbers in monkeys and humans. Psychological Science, 17, 401–406. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01719.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chokron, S., & Imbert, M. (1993). Influence of reading habits on line bisection. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, 219–222. doi:10.1016/0926-6410(93)90005-P
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chong, S. C., & Treisman, A. (2003). Representation of statistical properties. Vision Research, 43, 393–404. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00596-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen Kadosh, R., & Walsh, V. (2009). Numerical representation in the parietal lobes: Abstract or not abstract? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 313–328. doi:10.1017/S0140525X09990938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Hevia, M. D. (2011). Sensitivity to number: A reply to Gebuis and Gevers. Cognition, 121, 253–255. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Hevia, M. D., Girelli, L., & Vallar, G. (2006). Numbers and space. A cognitive illusion?. Experimental Brain Research, 168, 254–264. doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0084-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Hevia, M. D., & Spelke, E. S. (2009). Spontaneous mapping of number and space in adults and young children. Cognition, 110, 198–207. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S. (2011). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., & Mehler, J. (1992). Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words. Cognition, 43, 1–29. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90030-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 307–314. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fias, W., Brysbaert, M., Geypens, F., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 95–110. doi: 10.1080/135467996387552
   Google Scholar
• Fias, W., Lauwereyns, J., & Lammertyn, J. (2001). Irrelevant digits affect feature-based attention depending on the overlap of neural circuits. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 415–423. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00078-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fischer, M. H. (2001). Number processing induces spatial performance biases. Neurology, 57, 822–826. doi:10.1212/WNL.57.5.822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebuis, T., & Gevers, W. (2011). Numerosities and space: Indeed a cognitive illusion! A reply to de Hevia and Spelke (2009). Cognition, 121, 248–252. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebuis, T., & Reynvoet, B. (2012a). The interplay between nonsymbolic number and its continuous visual properties. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 642–648. doi:10.1037/a0026218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebuis, T., & Reynvoet, B. (2012b). The role of visual information in numerosity estimation. PloS One, 7, e37426. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halberda, J., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Developmental change in the acuity of the “number sense”: The approximate number system in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1457–1465. doi:10.1037/a0012682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halberda, J., Mazzocco, M. M. M., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature, 455, 665–668. doi:10.1038/nature07246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 435–448. doi:10.1038/nrn1684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurewitz, F., Gelman, R., & Schnitzer, B. (2006). Sometimes area counts more than number. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 19599–19604. doi:10.1073/pnas.0609485103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, D. C. (2011). Two systems of non-symbolic numerical cognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 150. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jevons, W. S. (1871). The power of numerical discrimination. Nature, 3, 281–282. doi:10.1038/003281a0
   Google Scholar
• Jewell, G., & McCourt, M. E. (2000). Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38, 93–110. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00045-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, E. L., Lord, M. W., Reese, T. W., & Volkmann, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number. The American Journal of Psychology, 62, 498–525. doi: 10.2307/1418556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibovich, T., & Henik, A. (2013). Magnitude processing in non-symbolic stimuli. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 375. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, M. R., & Lourenco, S. F. (2007). Spatial attention and the mental number line: Evidence for characteristic biases and compression. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1400–1407. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T., Bull, R., & Cleland, A. A. (2012). Implicit response-irrelevant number information triggers the SNARC effect: Evidence using a neural overlap paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1945–1961. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.673631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieder, A., & Dehaene, S. (2009). The representation of number in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 32, 185–208. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuerk, H.-C., Wood, G., & Willmes, K. (2005). The association between number magnitude and space is amodal. Experimental Psychology, 52, 187–194. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.52.3.187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piazza, M., Pinel, P., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2007). A magnitude code common to numerosities and number symbols in human intraparietal cortex. Neuron, 53, 293–305. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160–174. doi:10.1037/0096–3445.109.2.160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranzini, M., & Girelli, L. (2012). Exploiting illusory effects to disclose similarities in numerical and luminance processing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1001–1008. doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0302-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sophian, C., & Chu, Y, (2008). How do people apprehend large numerosities?. Cognition, 107, 460–478. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stöttinger, E., Anderson, B., Danckert, J., Frühholz, B., & Wood, G. (2012). Spatial bias in number line bisection tasks are due to a cognitive illusion of length. Experimental Brain Research, 220, 147–152. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3125-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently?. A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101, 80–102. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, F., & Spelke, E. S. (2000). Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants. Cognition, 74, B1–B11. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00066-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar