The clash of expectancies: Does the P300 amplitude reflect both passive and active expectations?

REFERENCES

• Berlad, I., & Pratt, H. (1995). P300 in response to the subject's own name. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 96(5), 472–474. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(95)00116-A
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bradley, M. M. (2009). Natural selective attention: Orienting and emotion. Psychophysiology, 46(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00702.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donchin, E. (1981). Surprise! … Surprise? Psychophysiology, 18(5), 493–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farwell, L. A., & Donchin, E. (1991). The truth will out: Interrogative polygraphy (“Lie Detection”) with event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 28(5), 531–547. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1991.tb01990.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari, V., Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., & Lang, P. J. (2009). Detecting novelty and significance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(2), 404–411. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratton, G., Bosco, C. M., Kramer, A. F., Coles, M. G. H., Wickens, C. D., & Donchin, E. (1990). Event-related brain potentials as indices of information extraction and response priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 75(5), 419–432. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90087-Z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gray, H. M., Ambady, N., Lowenthal, W. T., & Deldin, P. (2004). P300 as an index of attention to self-relevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(2), 216–224. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00092-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennighausen, E., Heil, M., & Rösler, F. (1993). A correction method for DC drift artifacts. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 86(3), 199–204. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(93)90008-J
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson, R. (1986). A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. Psychophysiology, 23(4), 367–383. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00649.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, T. P., Makeig, S., Humphries, C., Lee, T. W., McKeown, M. J., & Iragui, V. (2000). Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology, 37(2), 163–178. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3720163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). Variants of uncertainty. Cognition, 11(2), 143–157. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(82)90023-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karis, D., Chesney, G. L., & Donchin, E. (1983). “ … 't was ten to one; And yet we ventured … ”1: P300 and Decision Making. Psychophysiology, 20(3), 260–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1983.tb02153.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katayama, J., & Polich, J. (1996). P300, probability, and the three-tone paradigm. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 100(6), 555–562. doi: 10.1016/S0168-5597(96)95171-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kok, A. (1988). Probability mismatch and template mismatch: A paradox in P300 amplitude? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(3), 388–389. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00058143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok, A. (1997). Event-related-potential (ERP) reflections of mental resource˚s: A review and synthesis. Biological Psychology, 45(13), 19–56. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0511(96)05221-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotchoubey, B. (2006). Event-related potentials, cognition, and behavior: A biological approach. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(1), 42–65. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotchoubey, B., Grözinger, B., Kornhuber, A. W., & Kornhuber, H. H. (1997). Electrophysiological analysis of expectancy: P3 in informed guessing. International Journal of Neuroscience, 91(1–2), 105–122. doi: 10.3109/00207459708986369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matt, J., Leuthold, H., & Sommer, W. (1992). Differential effects of voluntary expectancies on reaction times and event-related potentials: Evidence for automatic and controlled expectancies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(4), 810–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polich, J. (1986). Attention, probability, and task demands as determinants of P300 latency from auditory stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 63(3), 251–259. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(86)90093-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polich, J. (1987). Task difficulty, probability, and inter-stimulus interval as determinants of P300 from auditory stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 68(4), 311–320. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(87)90052-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(10), 2128–2148. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polich, J., & Kok, A. (1995). Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: An integrative review. Biological Psychology, 41(2), 103–146. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(95)05130-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter, W., Sussman, E., Deacon, D., Cowan, N., & Vaughan, H. G. (1999). Two cognitive systems simultaneously prepared for opposite events. Psychophysiology, 36(06), 835–838. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3660835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rösler, F. (1981). Event-related brain potentials in a stimulus-discrimination learning paradigm. Psychophysiology, 18(4), 447–455. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb02478.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruchkin, D. S., & Sutton, S. (1983). Positive slow wave and P300: Association and dissociation. In A. W. K. Gaillard & W. Ritter (Eds.), Tutorials in event-related potential research: Endogenous components (pp. 233–250). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Sommer, W., Leuthold, H., & Matt, J. (1998). The expectancies that govern the P300 amplitude are mostly automatic and unconscious. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(01), 149–150. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X98210958
   Google Scholar
• Sommer, W., Leuthold, H., & Soetens, E. (1999). Covert signs of expectancy in serial reaction time tasks revealed by event-related potentials. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(2), 342–353. doi: 10.3758/BF03206892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer, W., Matt, J., & Leuthold, H. (1990). Consciousness of attention and expectancy as reflected in event-related potentials and reaction times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16(5), 902–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squires, K., Petuchowski, S., Wickens, C., & Donchin, E. (1977). The effects of stimulus sequence on event related potentials: A comparison of visual and auditory sequences. Perception & Psychophysics, 22(1), 31–40. doi: 10.3758/BF03206077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tueting, P., Sutton, S., & Zubin, J. (1970). Quantitative evoked potential correlates of the probability events. Psychophysiology, 7(3), 385–394. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1970.tb01763.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verleger, R. (1988). Event-related potentials and cognition: A critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(03), 343–356. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00058015
   Google Scholar
• Verleger, R., Jaśkowski, P., & Wauschkuhn, B. (1994). Suspense and surprise: On the relationship between expectancies and P3. Psychophysiology, 31(4), 359–369. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02444.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., Kramer, A. F., Vanasse, L., & Donchin, E. (1983). Performance of concurrent tasks: A psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources. Science, 221(4615), 1080–1082. doi: 10.1126/science.6879207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar