Task instructions determine the visuospatial and verbal–spatial nature of number–space associations

REFERENCES

• Bächtold, D., Baumüller, M., & Brugger, P. (1998). Stimulus–response compatibility in representational space. Neuropsychologia, 36, 731–735. doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00002-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, R., Cleland, A. A., & Mitchell, T. (2013). Sex differences in the spatial representation of number. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 181–192. doi:10.1037/a0028387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, R., Marschark, M., & Blatto-Valle, G. (2005). SNARC hunting: Examining number representation in deaf students. Learning and Individual Difference, 15, 223–236. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2005.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castronovo, J., & Seron, X. (2007). Semantic numerical representation in blind subjects: The role of vision in the spatial format of the mental number line. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 101–119. doi:10.1080/17470210600598635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cipora, K., & Nuerk, H. C. (2013). Is the SNARC effect related to the level of mathematics? No systematic relationship observed despite more power, more repetitions, and more direct assessment of arithmetic skill. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(10), 1974–1991. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.772215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(3), 371–396. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Hevia, M. D., Vallar, G., & Girelli, L. (2008). Visualizing numbers in the mind's eye: the role of visuo-spatial processes in numerical abilities. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32(8), 1361–1372. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.05.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fias, W., Brysbaert, M., Geypens, F., & D’ Ydewalle, G. (1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2(1), 95–110. doi:10.1080/135467996387552
   Google Scholar
• Fias, W., van Dijck, J. P., & Gevers, W. (2011). How number is associated with space? The role of working memory. In S. Dehaene & E. M. Brannon (Eds.), Space, time and number in the brain: Searching for the foundations of mathematical thought (pp. 133–148). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. H. (2006). The future for SNARC could be stark. Cortex, 42, 1066–1068. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70218-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 555–556. doi:10.1038/nn1066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galfano, G., Rusconi, E., & Umiltà, C. (2006). Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one's will. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 869–874. doi:10.3758/BF03194011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., Özyürek, A., Gürcanli, Ö., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2013). Spatial language facilitates spatial cognition: Evidence from children who lack language input. Cognition, 127(3), 318–330. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georges, C., Hoffmann, D., & Schiltz, C. (2014, May). Cognitive style influences number-space associations. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Belgian Association for Psychological Sciences, Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Gevers, W., Santens, S., Dhooge, E., Chen, Q., Van den Bossche, L., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2010). Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of number-space interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 139(1), 180–190. doi:10.1037/a0017688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gevers, W., Verguts, T., Reynvoet, B., Caessens, B., & Fias, W. (2006). Numbers and space: A computational model of the SNARC effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 32–44. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffaux, V., Martin, R., Dormal, G., Goebel, R., & Schiltz, C. (2012). Attentional shifts induced by uninformative number symbols modulate neural activity in human occipital cortex. Neuropsychologia, 50(14), 3419–3428. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halligan, P. W., Fink, G. R., Marchall, J. C., & Vallar, G. (2003). Spatialcognition: Evidence from visual neglect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 125–133. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00032-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrerra, A., Macizo, P., & Semenza, C. (2008). The role of working memory in the association between number magnitude and space. Acta Psychologica, 128, 225–237. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, D., Mussolin, C., Martin, R., & Schiltz, C. (2014). The impact of mathematical proficiency on the number-space association. PLoS ONE, 9(1), e85048. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, D., Pigat, D., & Schiltz, C. (2014). The impact of inhibition capacities and age on number-space associations. Cognitive Processing. doi:10.1007/s10339-014-0601-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbo, I., Brauwer, J. D., Fias, W., & Gevers, W. (2012). The development of the SNARC effect: Evidence for early verbal coding. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111(4), 671–680. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, F., Lindemann, O., Toni, I., & Bekkering, H. (2014). Different brains process numbers differently: Structural bases of individual differences in spatial and non-spatial number representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(4), 768–776. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorch, R. F., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(1), 149–157. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.1.149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature, 215(5109), 1519–1520. doi:10.1038/2151519a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuerk, H. C., Bauer, F., Krummenacher, J., Heller, D., & Willmes, K. (2005). The power of the mental number line: How the magnitude of unattended numbers affects performance in an Eriksen task. Psychology Science, 47, 34–50.
   Google Scholar
• Nuerk, H. C., Iverson, W., & Willmes, K. (2004). Notational modulation of the SNARC and MARC (Linguistic Markedness of Response Codes) effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 57(A), 835–863. doi:10.1080/02724980343000512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priftis, K., Zorzi, M., Meneghello, F., Marenzi, R., & Umiltà, C. (2006). Explicit versus implicit processing of representational space in neglect: Dissociations in accessing the mental number line. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(4), 680–688. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.4.680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, R. W., & Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 416–442. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Restle, F. (1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83(2), 274–278. doi:10.1037/h0028573
   Google Scholar
• Ristic, J., Wright, A., & Kingstone, A. (2006). The number line effect reflects top-down control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 862–868. doi:10.3758/BF03194010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime User's Guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Shaki, S., Algom, D., & Petrusic, W. M. (2006). Automatic activation of numerical magnitude? Evidence from joint derivation of SNARC and size congruity effects. Poster presented at the 21st Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics.
   Google Scholar
• Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). Reading space into numbers - A cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect. Cognition, 108, 590–599. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaki, S., & Gevers, W. (2011). Cultural characteristics dissociate magnitude and ordinal information processing. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 639–650. doi:10.1177/0022022111406100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umiltà, C., Priftis, K., & Zorzi, M. (2009). The spatial representation of numbers: Evidence from neglect and pseudoneglect. Experimental Brain Research, 192(3), 561–569. doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1623-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J. P., Gevers, W., & Fias, W. (2009). Numbers are associated with different types of spatial information depending on the task. Cognition, 113(2), 248–253. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J. P., Gevers, W., Lafosse, C., & Fias, W. (2012). The heterogeneous nature of number-space interactions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5(182), 1–13. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J. P., Ginsburg, V., Girelli, L., & Gevers, W. (in press). Linking numbers to space: From the mental number line towards a hybrid account. In R. Cohen Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), Oxford handbook of numerical cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Galen, M. S., & Reitsma, P. (2008). Developing access to number magnitude: A study of the SNARC effect in 7- to 9-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 101(2), 99–113. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, G., Willmes, K., Nuerk, H.-C., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science, 50(4), 489–525. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.52.3.187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorzi, M., Priftis, K., & Umiltà, C. (2002). Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature, 417(6885), 138–139. doi:10.1038/417138a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar