161
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Rapid communication

Response cost to repeated displays—When previous distractors become targets

&
Pages 625-634 | Received 19 Mar 2014, Accepted 23 Dec 2014, Published online: 18 Feb 2015

REFERENCES

  • Brady, T. F., & Chun, M. M. (2007). Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: Modeling contextual cuing. Journal Of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception And Performance, 33(4), 798–815. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.798
  • Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28–71. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0681
  • Conci, M., Sun, L., & Müller, H. J. (2011). Contextual remapping in visual search after predictable target-location changes. Psychological Research, 75(4), 279–289. doi:10.1007/s00426-010-0306-3
  • Crawford, T. J., Hill, S., & Higham, S. (2005). The inhibitory effect of a recent distracter. Vision Research, 45(27), 3365–3378. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.024
  • Endo, N., & Takeda, Y. (2004). Selective learning of spatial configuration and object identity in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 68(2), 293–302. doi: 10.3758/BF03194880
  • Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2003). Memory for rejected distractors in visual search? Visual Cognition, 10(3), 257–298. doi:10.1080/13506280143000005
  • Huang, T., & Grossberg, S. (2010). Cortical dynamics of contextually cued attentive visual learning and search: Spatial and object evidence accumulation. Psychological Review, 117(4), 1080–1112. doi:10.1037/a0020664
  • Jiang, Y., & Song, J. (2005). Hyperspecificity in Visual Implicit Learning: Learning of Spatial Layout Is Contingent on Item Identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception And Performance, 31(6), 1439–1448. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1439.
  • Kunar, M. A., & Wolfe, J. M. (2011). Target absent trials in configural contextual cuing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(7), 2077–2091. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0164-0
  • Makovski, T., & Jiang, Y. V. (2010). Contextual cost: When a visual-search target is not where it should be. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(2), 216–225. doi:10.1080/17470210903281590
  • Ogawa, H., Takeda, Y., & Kumada, T. (2007). Probing attentional modulation of contextual cueing. Visual Cognition, 15, 276–289. doi: 10.1080/13506280600756977
  • Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
  • Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(2), 202–238. doi:10.3758/BF03200774
  • Zellin, M., Conci, M., van Mühlenen, A., & Müller, H. J. (2013). Here today, gone tomorrow: Memory adaptation in contextual cueing. PLoS One, 8(3), e59466. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059466

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.