Cue competition effects in human causal learning

REFERENCES

• Aitken, M. R. F., Larkin, M. J. W., Dickinson, A. (2001). Re-examination of the role of within-compound associations in the retrospective revaluation of causal judgments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54B, 27–51. doi: 10.1080/02724990042000029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckers, T., Vandorpe, S., Debeys, I., De Houwer, J. (2009). Three-year-old's retrospective revaluation in the blicket detector task: Backward blocking or recovery from overshadowing. Experimental Psychology, 56, 27–32. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.1.27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro, L., & Wasserman, E. A. (2007). Discrimination blocking: Acquisition versus performance deficits in human contingency learning. Learning & Behavior, 35, 149–162. doi: 10.3758/BF03193050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, G. B. (1991). Trial order affects cue interaction in contingency judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 837–854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, P. W. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104, 367–405. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, P. W., & Novick, L. R. (1990). A probabilistic contrast model of causal induction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 545–567. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, P. W., & Novick, L. R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal induction. Psychological Review, 99, 365–382. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.99.2.365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J., & Beckers, T. (2003). Secondary task modulates forward blocking in human contingency learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56B, 345–357. doi: 10.1080/02724990244000296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, A., & Burke, J. (1996). Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 60–80. doi: 10.1080/713932614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, A., Shanks, D. R., & Evenden, J. (1984). Judgment of act-outcome contingency: The role of selective attribution. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 29–50. doi: 10.1080/14640748408401502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gluck, M. A., & Bower, G. H. (1988). From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 225–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah, S. D., Crump, M. J. C., Allan, L. G., & Siegel, S. (2009). Cue-interaction effects in contingency judgments using the streamed-trial procedure. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 103–112. doi: 10.1037/a0013521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hume, D. (1748/1910). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Harvard Classics (Vol. 37). Cambridge, MA: P. F. Collier & Son.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., & Ward, W. (1965). Judgment of contingency between responses and outcomes. Psychological Monographs, 79, 1–17. doi: 10.1037/h0093874
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Wang, A. Y., & Taylor, T. H. (1979). Fact and fantasy: The roles of accuracy and variability in confusing imaginations with perceptual experiences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 229–240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson, M. K., Taylor, T. H., & Raye, C. L. (1977). Fact and fantasy: The effects of internally generated events on the apparent frequency of externally generated events. Memory & Cognition, 5, 116–122. doi: 10.3758/BF03209202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kamin, L. J. (1968). “Attention-like” processes in classical conditioning. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Miami Symposium on the prediction of Behavior: Aversive stimulation (pp. 9–33). Miami: University of Miami Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kamin, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. In B. A. Campbell & R. M. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279–296). New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, M. A. & Bolles, R. C. (1981). A nonassociative aspect of overshadowing. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 318–320. doi: 10.3758/BF03333639
   Google Scholar
• Larkin, M. J. W., Aitken, M. R. F., & Dickinson, A. (1998). Retrospective revaluation of causal judgments under positive and negative contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1331–1352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Pelley, M. E., & McLaren, I. P. L. (2001). Retrospective revaluation in humans: Learning or memory? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54B, 311–352. doi: 10.1080/02724990143000072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Pelley, M. E., Oakeshott, S. M., & McLaren, I. P. L. (2005). Blocking and unblocking in human causal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal behavior Processes, 31, 56–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P., & Luhmann, C. C. (2013). Evidence that a transient but cognitively demanding process underlies forward blocking. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 744–766. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.717952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovibond, P. F., Been, S. L., Mitchell, C. J., Bouton, M. E., & Frohardt, R. (2003). Forward and backward blocking of causal judgment is enhanced by additivity of effect magnitude. Memory & Cognition, 31, 133–142. doi: 10.3758/BF03196088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludvig, E. A., Mirian, M. S., Sutton, R. S., & Kehoe, E. J. (2010). Associative learning from replayed experience. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of The Pavlovian Society, October 14–16, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, C. C., & Ahn, W. (2011). Expectations and interpretations during causal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 568–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luque, D., Flores, A., & Vadillo, M. A. (2013). Revisiting the role of within-compound associations in cue-interaction phenomena. Learning & Behavior, 41, 61–76. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0085-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luque, D., & Vadillo, M. A. (2011). Backward versus forward blocking: Evidence for performance-based models of human contingency learning. Psychological Reports, 109, 1001–1016. doi: 10.2466/22.23.PR0.109.6.1001-1016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276–298. doi: 10.1037/h0076778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, T., Butterfill, S., Hoerl, C., & Burns, P. (2009). Cue competition effects and young children's causal and counterfactual inferences. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1563–1575. doi: 10.1037/a0017408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melchers, K. G., Lachnit, H., & Shanks, D. R. (2004). Within-compound associations in retrospective revaluation and in direct learning: A challenge for comparator theory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57B, 25–53. doi: 10.1080/02724990344000042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melchers, K. G., Lachnit, H., & Shanks, D. R. (2006). The comparator theory fails to account for the selective role of within-compound associations in cue-selection effects. Experimental Psychology, 53, 316–320. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.53.4.316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. J., De Houwer, J., & Lovibond, P. F. (2009). The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 183–198. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. J., Killedar, A., & Lovibond, P. F. (2005). Inference-based retrospective revaluation in human causal judgments requires knowledge of within-compound relationships. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 31, 418–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. J., Lovibond, P. F., Minard, E., & Lavis, Y. (2006). Forward blocking in human learning sometime reflects the failure to encode a cue-outcome relationship. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 830–844. doi: 10.1080/17470210500242847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61–73. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532–552. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.6.532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R. (1990). Connectionist models of recognition memory: Constraints imposed by learning and forgetting functions. Psychological Review, 97, 285–308. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non reinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Shanks, D. R. (1985). Forward and backward blocking in human contingency judgment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37B, 1–21. doi: 10.1080/14640748508402082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanks, D. R., & Dickinson, A. (1987). Associative accounts of causality judgment. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 21. pp. 229–261). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, R. M. & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, D., & McClelland, J. L. (2009). When should we expect indirect effects in human contingency learning? In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 206–211). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Stout, S. C., & Miller, R. R. (2007). Sometimes-competing retrieval (SOCR): A formalization of the comparator hypothesis. Psychological Review, 114, 759–783. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadillo, M. A., Castro, L., Matute, H., & Wasserman, E. A. (2008). Backward blocking: The role of within- compound associations and interference between cues trained apart. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 61, 185–193. doi: 10.1080/17470210701557464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hamme, L. J., & Wasserman, E. A. (1994). Cue competition in causality judgements: The role of nonpresentation of compound stimulus elements. Learning and Motivation, 25, 127–151. doi: 10.1006/lmot.1994.1008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandorpe, S., & De Houwer, J. (2005). A comparison of forward blocking and reduced overshadowing in human causal learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 945–949. doi: 10.3758/BF03196790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandorpe, S., & De Houwer, J. (2006). A comparison of cue competition in a simple and a complex design. Acta Psychologica, 122, 234–246. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandorpe, S., De Houwer, J. & Beckers, T. (2007). The role of memory for compounds in cue competition. Learning and Motivation, 38, 195–207. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2007.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, A. R. (1969). Incidental stimuli and discrimination learning. In G. Gilbert & N. S. Sutherland (Eds.), Animal discrimination learning (pp. 83–111). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.). Information Processing in Animals: Memory Mechanisms (pp. 5–47). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Waldmann, M. R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1992). Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: Asymmetries in cue competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 222–236. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.121.2.222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldmann, M. R., & Walker, J. M. (2005). Competence and performance in causal learning. Learning & Behavior, 33, 211–229. doi: 10.3758/BF03196064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, E. A., & Berglan, L. R. (1998). Backward blocking and recovery from overshadowing in human causal judgement: The role of within-compound associations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51B, 121–138.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, E. A., & Castro, L. (2005). Surprise and change: variations in the strength of present and absent cues in causal learning. Learning & Behavior, 33, 131–146. doi: 10.3758/BF03196058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar