Neural correlates of early-closure garden-path processing: Effects of prosody and plausibility

REFERENCES

• Anderson, C., & Carlson, K. (2010). Syntactic structure guides prosody in temporarily ambiguous sentences. Language and Speech, 53(4), 1–22. doi: 10.1177/0023830910372497
   Google Scholar
• Banich, M. T., & Shenker, J. I. (1994). Investigations of interhemispheric processing: Methodological considerations. Neuropsychology, 8(2), 263–277. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.8.2.263
   Google Scholar
• Baum, S. R., & Dwivedi, V. D. (2003). Sensitivity to prosodic structure in left- and right-hemisphere-damaged individuals. Brain Language, 87(2), 278–289. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00109-3
   Google Scholar
• Bemis, D. K., & Pylkkanen, L. (2013). Basic linguistic composition recruits the left anterior temporal lobe and left angular gyrus during both listening and reading. Cererbal Cortex, 23(8), 1859–1873. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs170
   Google Scholar
• Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 279–362). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9/10), 341–345.
   Google Scholar
• Bookheimer, S. (2002). Functional MRI of language: New approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 151–188. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142946
   Google Scholar
• Bornkessel, I., McElree, B., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Multi-dimensional contributions to garden path strength: Dissociating phrase structure from case marking. Journal of Memory & Language, 51, 495–522. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.06.011
   Google Scholar
• Bornkessel, I., Zysset, S., Friederici, A. D., Von Cramon, D. Y., & Schlesewsky, M. (2005). Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension. Neuroimage, 26(1), 221–233. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.032
   Google Scholar
• Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2013). Reconciling time, space and function: A new dorsal–ventral stream model of sentence comprehension. Brain and Language, 125(1), 60–76. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.01.010
   Google Scholar
• Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Schlesewsky, M., & Von Cramon, D. Y. (2009). Word order and Broca's region: Evidence for a supra-syntactic perspective. Brain and Language, 111(3), 125–139. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Brett, M., Anton, J.-L., Valabregue, R., & Poline, J.-B. (2002). Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, K. R. (2010). Syntactic reconstruction and reanalysis, semantic dead ends, and prefrontal cortex. Brain and Cognition, 73(1), 41–50. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J. F., & Ferreira, F. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 368–407. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0752
   Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., Luke, S. G., & Ferreira, F. (2010). Effects of plausibility on structural priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(2), 538–544.
   Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., Williams, C. C., Zacks, R. T., & Ferreira, F. (2006). Younger and older adults’ “good-enough” interpretations of garden-path sentences. Discourse Processes, 42(2), 205–238. doi: 10.1207/s15326950dp4202_6
   Google Scholar
• Cole, J., Mo, Y., & Baek, S. (2010). The role of syntactic structure in guiding prosody perception with ordinary listeners and everyday speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(7–9), 1141–1177. doi: 10.1080/01690960903525507
   Google Scholar
• Collette, F., & Van der Linden, M. (2002). Brain imaging of the central executive component of working memory. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 26, 105–125. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7634(01)00063-X
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, W., & Paccia-Cooper, J. (1980). Syntax and speech. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, A. M. (1999). Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 8, 109–114. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:2/3<109::AID-HBM7>3.0.CO;2-W
   Google Scholar
• DeDe, G. (2010). Utilization of prosodic information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39(4), 345–374. doi: 10.1007/s10936-009-9139-x
   Google Scholar
• Den Ouden, D.-B., Saur, D., Mader, W., Schelter, B., Lukic, S., Wali, E., … Thompson, C. K. (2012). Network modulation during complex syntactic processing. Neuroimage, 59(1), 815–823. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.057
   Google Scholar
• Dien, J., & O'Hare, A. J. (2008). Evidence for automatic sentence priming in the fusiform semantic area: Convergent ERP and fMRI findings. Brain Research, 1243, 134–145. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.09.045
   Google Scholar
• Engström, M., Landtblom, A.-M., & Karlsson, T. (2013). Brain and effort: Brain activation and effort-related working memory in healthy participants and patients with working memory deficits. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(140), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 164–203. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00005-7
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 11–15. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00158
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1991). Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(6), 725–745. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90034-H
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1998). Syntactic reanalysis, thematic processing, and sentence comprehension. In J. D. Fodor & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 73–100). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Patson, N. D. (2007). The ‘good enough’ approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(1–2), 71–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00007.x
   Google Scholar
• Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., Lohmann, G., von Cramon, D. Y., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Revisiting the role of Broca's area in sentence processing: Syntactic integration versus syntactic working memory. Human Brain Mapping, 24(2), 79–91. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20070
   Google Scholar
• Fiebach, C. J., Vos, S. H., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Neural correlates of syntactic ambiguity in sentence comprehension for low and high span readers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(9), 1562–1575. doi: 10.1162/0898929042568479
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. A. (1983). Modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, L. (1979). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. (Ph.D. dissertation). University of Connecticut.
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., Carlson, K., & Clifton, C. (2006). Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(6), 244–249. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.04.002
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178–210. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(82)90008-1
   Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D. (2009). Pathways to language: Fiber tracts in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 175–181. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D. (2012). The cortical language circuit: From auditory perception to sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(5), 262–268. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., Von Cramon, D. Y., & Kotz, S. A. (2007). Role of the corpus callosum in speech comprehension: Interfacing syntax and prosody. Neuron, 53(1), 135–145. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.020
   Google Scholar
• Greve, D. N. (2002). Optseq2. [Software]. Retrieved from http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/optseq
   Google Scholar
• Grewe, T., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Zysset, S., Wiese, R., Von Cramon, D. Y., & Schlesewsky, M. (2007). The role of the posterior superior temporal sulcus in the processing of unmarked transitivity. NeuroImage, 35, 343–352. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.045
   Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y., & Friederici, A. D. (2006). Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16, 240–246. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.03.007
   Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P. (2005). On Broca, brain, and binding: A new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(9), 416–423. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Hickok, G., & Rogalsky, C. (2011). What does Broca's area activation to sentences reflect? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 2629–2631. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00044
   Google Scholar
• Hoeks, J. C. J., Vonk, W., & Schriefers, H. (2002). Processing coordinated structures in context: The effect of topic-structure on ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 99–119. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2800
   Google Scholar
• Humphries, C., Love, T., Swinney, D., & Hickok, G. (2005). Response of anterior temporal cortex to syntactic and prosodic manipulations during sentence processing. Human Brain Mapping, 26(2), 128–138. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20148
   Google Scholar
• Humphries, C., Binder, J. R., Medler, D. A., Liebenthal, E. (2007). Time course of semantic processes during sentence comprehension: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 36(3), 924–932. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.059
   Google Scholar
• January, D., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). Co-localization of Stroop and syntactic ambiguity resolution in Broca's area: Implications for the neural basis of sentence processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(12), 2434–2444. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21179
   Google Scholar
• Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. Y. (2002). The brain circuitry of syntactic comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(8), 350–356. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01947-2
   Google Scholar
• Kim, A., & Osterhout, L. (2005). The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 205–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Kjelgaard, M. M., & Speer, S. R. (1999). Prosodic facilitation and interference in the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(2), 153–194. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2620
   Google Scholar
• Klepousniotou, E., Gracco, V. L., & Pike, G. B. (2014). Pathways to lexical ambiguity: fMRI evidence for bilateral fronto-parietal involvement in language processing. Brain and Language, 131(0), 56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146, 23–49. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.063
   Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R., Lakshmanan, B. M., Caplan, D. N., & Holcomb, P. J. (2006). Making sense of discourse: An fMRI study of causal inferencing across sentences. Neuroimage, 33(1), 343–361. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R., Sitnikova, T., & Lakshmanan, B. M. (2008). Neuroanatomical distinctions within the semantic system during sentence comprehension: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage, 40(1), 367–388. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.009
   Google Scholar
• Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics: (De)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 920–933. doi: 10.1038/nrn2532
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R. A., & Just, M. A. (2004). How the brain processes causal inferences in text – A theoretical account of generation and integration component processes utilizing both cerebral hemispheres. Psychological Science, 15(1), 1–7. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01501001.x
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R. A., Just, M. A., Keller, T. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (2003). Ambiguity in the brain: What brain imaging reveals about the processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(6), 1319–1338.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M., Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., Friederici, A. D., & Von Cramon, D. Y. (2004). Brain activity varies with modulation of dynamic pitch variance in sentence melody. Brain and Language, 89(2), 277–289. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00350-X
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, C., Arai, M., & Mazuka, R. (2012). Immediate use of prosody and context in predicting a syntactic structure. Cognition, 125(2), 317–323. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.016
   Google Scholar
• Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2005). Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca's area in sentence comprehension. Cognitive Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(3), 263–281. doi: 10.3758/CABN.5.3.263
   Google Scholar
• Patson, N. D., & Ferreira, F. (2009). Conceptual plural information is used to guide early parsing decisions: Evidence from garden-path sentences with reciprocal verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(4), 464–486. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Pauker, E., Itzhak, I., Baum, S. R., & Steinhauer, K. (2011). Effects of cooperating and conflicting prosody in spoken english garden path sentences: ERP evidence for the boundary deletion hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 2731–2751. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2011.21610
   Google Scholar
• Penny, W., Friston, K., Ashburner, J., Kiebel, S., & Nichols, T. (Eds.). (2007). Statistical parametric mapping: The analysis of functional brain images (1st ed.). London: Academic Press. [Software]. Retrieved from http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/
   Google Scholar
• Petersson, K. M., Forkstam, C., & Ingvar, M. (2004). Artificial syntactic violations activate Broca's region. Cognitive Science, 28(3), 383–407.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (1998). Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 24(4), 940–961.
   Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., Kherif, F., Hauk, O., Mohr, B., Nimmo-Smith, I. (2009). Distributed cell assemblies for general lexical and category-specific semantic processing as revealed by fMRI cluster analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 3837–3850. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20811
   Google Scholar
• Quiñones, I., Molinaro, N., Mancini, S., Hernández-Cabrera, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2014). Where agreement merges with disagreement: fMRI evidence of subject–verb integration. NeuroImage. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.038
   Google Scholar
• Ross, E. D. (1981). The aprosodias: Functional anatomic organization of the components of language in the right hemisphere. Archives of Neurology, 38, 561–570. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1981.00510090055006
   Google Scholar
• Ross, E. D., & Mesulam, M. (1979). Dominant language functions of the right hemisphere? Prosody or emotional gesturing. Archives of Neurology, 46, 437–443.
   Google Scholar
• Sammler, D., Kotz, S. A., Eckstein, K., Ott, D. V. M., & Friederici, A. D. (2010). Prosody meets syntax: The role of the corpus callosum. Brain, 133(9), 2643–2655. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq231
   Google Scholar
• Shetreet, E., Friedmann, N., & Hadar, U. (2010). Cortical representation of verbs with optional complements: The theoretical contribution of fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 31(5), 770–785. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20904
   Google Scholar
• Shetreet, E., Palti, D., Friedmann, N., & Hadar, U. (2007). Cortical representation of verb processing in sentence comprehension: Number of complements, subcategorization and thematic frames. Cerebral Cortex, 17(8), 1958–1969. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl105
   Google Scholar
• Slattery, T. J., Sturt, P., Christianson, K., Yoshida, M., & Ferreira, F. (2013). Lingering misinterpretations of garden path sentences arise from competing syntactic representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(2), 104–120. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, J. (2003). Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 103–130. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00519-3
   Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. M., Vosse, T., Kempen, G., Van Berkum, J. J. A., Petersson, K. M., & Hagoort, P. (2009). Retrieval and unification of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: An fMRI study using word-category ambiguity. Cerebral Cortex, 19(7), 1493–1503. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn187
   Google Scholar
• Speer, S., & Blodgett, A. (2006). Prosody. In M. J. Traxler & M. Gernsbacher (Eds.), The handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 505–538). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Stanczak, L., Caplan, D., Waters, G., Babbitt, L., Lee, J. M., Kuperberg, G. R., & Perlmutter, N. (2007). BOLD signal correlates of semantic plausibility as a function of working memory and task demand. Poster presented at the 14th Annual Cognitive Neuroscience Society Meeting, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Stowe, L. A., Broere, C. A. J., Paans, A. M. J., Wijers, G. M., Vaalburg, W., & Zwarts, F. (1998). Localizing components of a complex task: Sentence processing and working memory. NeuroReport, 9, 2995–2999. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199809140-00014
   Google Scholar
• Strelnikov, K. N., Vorobyev, V. A., Chernigovskaya, T. V., & Medvedev, S. V. (2006). Prosodic clues to syntactic processing – A PET and ERP study. Neuroimage, 29(4), 1127–1134. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.021
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K., Bonakdarpour, B., Fix, S. C., Blumenfeld, H. K., Parrish, T. B., Gitelman, D. R., & Mesulam, M. M. (2007). Neural correlates of verb argument structure processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(11), 1753–1767. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.11.1753
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K., Den Ouden, D-B., Bonakdarpour, B., Garibaldi, K., & Parrish, T. B. (2010). Neural plasticity and treatment-induced recovery of sentence processing in agrammatism. Neuropsychologia, 48(11), 3211–3227. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.036
   Google Scholar
• Thothathiri, M., Kim, A., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2012). Parametric effects of syntactic–semantic conflict in Broca's area during sentence processing. Brain and Language, 120(3), 259–264. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.12.004
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, D. J., & Bever, T. G. (2001). Sentence comprehension: The integration of habits and rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Ettinger-Veenstra, H. M., Ragnehed, M., Hällgren, M., Karlsson, T., Landtblom, A. M., Lundberg, P., & Engström, M. (2010). Right-hemispheric brain activation correlates to language performance. Neuroimage, 49(4), 3481–3488. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.041
   Google Scholar
• Van Herten, M., Chwilla, D. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2006). When heuristics clash with parsing routines: ERP evidence for conflict monitoring in sentence perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(7), 1181–1197. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1181
   Google Scholar
• Van Lancker, D. (1980). Cerebral lateralization of pitch cues in the linguistic signal. Papers in Linguistics: International Journal Human Communication, 13, 200–277. doi: 10.1080/08351818009370498
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J. P., Daigle, T., & Buzzard, M. (2002). Hemispheric specialisation in processing prosodic structures: Revisited. Aphasiology, 16(12), 1155–1172. doi: 10.1080/02687030244000392
   Google Scholar
• Weintraub, S., Mesulam, M. M., & Kramer, L. (1981). Disturbances in prosody. A right-hemisphere contribution to language. Archives of Neurology, 38(12), 742–744. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1981.00510120042004
   Google Scholar
• Wong, P. C. (2002). Hemispheric specialization of linguistic pitch patterns. Brain Research Bulletin, 59(2), 83–95. doi: 10.1016/S0361-9230(02)00860-2
   Google Scholar
• Wunderlich, A., Ziegler, W., & Geigenberger, A. (2003). Implicit processing of prosodic information in patients with left and right hemisphere stroke. Aphasiology, 17(9), 861–879. doi: 10.1080/02687030344000283
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Z., Feng, G., Zhang, J. X., Li, G., Li, H., & Wang, S. (2013). The role of the left prefrontal cortex in sentence-level semantic integration. Neuroimage, 76, 325–331. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.060
   Google Scholar