REFERENCES
- Adelman, J. S., & Brown, G. D. A. (2008). Modeling lexical decision: The form of frequency and diversity effects. Psychological Review, 115(1), 214–227. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.214 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.214
- Adelman, J. S., Brown, G. D. A., & Quesada, J. F. (2006). Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science, 17(9), 814–823. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01787.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01787.x
- Adelman, J. S., Johnson, R. L., McCormick, S. F., McKague, M., Kinoshita, S., Bowers, J. S., … Davis, C. J. (2014). A behavioral database for masked form priming. Behavior Research Methods, 46(4), 1052–1067. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0442-y doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0442-y
- Baayen, R. H. (2010). A real experiment is a factorial experiment. The Mental Lexicon, 5(1), 149–157. doi:10.1075/ml.5.1.06baa
- Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Linguistic Data Consortium. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
- Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 283–316. http://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283 doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283
- Balota, D. A., Pilotti, M., & Cortese, M. J. (2001). Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words. Memory & Cognition, 29, 639–647. doi:10.3758/BF03200465
- Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., & Cortese, M. J. (2012). Megastudies: What do millions (or so) of trials tell us about lexical processing? In J. S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods (pp. 90–115). Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.
- Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Cortese, M. J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., … Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459. doi:10.3758/BF03193014
- Bestgen, Y., & Vincze, N. (2012). Checking and bootstrapping lexical norms by means of word similarity indexes. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 998–1006. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0195-z doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0195-z
- Brysbaert, M., Buchmeier, M., Conrad, M., Jacobs, A. M., Bölte, J., & Böhl, A. (2011). The word frequency effect: A review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German. Experimental Psychology, 58(5), 412–424. http://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000123 doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000123
- Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. http://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977 doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
- Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2013). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 1–8.
- Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS ONE, 5(6), e10729. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010729 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010729
- Chetail, F., Balota, D., Treiman, R., & Content, A. (2015). What can megastudies tell us about the orthographic structure of English words? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1–22. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.963628
- Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 33(4), 497–505. http://doi.org/10.1080/14640748108400805 doi: 10.1080/14640748108400805
- Cortese, M. J., Hacker, S., Schock, J., & Santo, J. B. (2015). Is reading-aloud performance in megastudies systematically influenced by the list context? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1–12. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.974624
- Cortese, M. J., Khanna, M. M., & Hacker, S. (2010). Recognition memory for 2,578 monosyllabic words. Memory, 18(6), 595–609. doi:10.1080/09658211.2010.493892
- Cortese, M. J., McCarty, D. P., & Schock, J. (2015). A mega recognition memory study of 2897 disyllabic words. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1–13. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.945096
- Cuetos Vega, F., González Nosti, M., Barbón Gutiérrez, A., & Brysbaert, M. (2011). SUBTLEX-ESP: Spanish word frequencies based on film subtitles. DIALNET. Retrieved from http://recopila.uniovi.es/dspace/handle/123456789/10272
- De Deyne, S., Verheyen, S., & Storms, G. (2015). The role of corpus size and syntax in deriving lexico-semantic representations for a wide range of concepts. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1–22. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.994098 doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.994098
- Dimitropoulou, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., Avilés, A., Corral, J., & Carreiras, M. (2010). Subtitle-based word frequencies as the best estimate of reading behavior: The case of Greek. Frontiers in Language Sciences, 1, 218. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00218
- Dufau, S., Duñabeitia, J. A., Moret-Tatay, C., McGonigal, A., Peeters, D., Alario, F-X., … Grainger, J. (2011). Smart phone, smart science: How the use of smartphones can revolutionize research in cognitive science. PLoS ONE, 6(9), e24974. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024974 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024974
- Ernestus, M., & Cutler, A. (2015). BALDEY: A database of auditory lexical decisions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1–20. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.984730 doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.984730
- Ferrand, L., New, B., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., Bonin, P., Méot, A., … Pallier, C. (2010). The French lexicon project: Lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 488–496. http://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.2.488 doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.2.488
- Forster, K. I. (2000). The potential for experimenter bias effects in word recognition experiments. Memory & Cognition, 28(7), 1109–1115. doi:10.3758/BF03211812
- Haagen, C. H. (1949). Synonymity, vividness, familiarity, and association value ratings of 400 pairs of common adjectives. Journal of Psychology, 27, 453–463 . Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1290585641/citation/F4D1C9100B804CD1PQ/3?accountid=11077 doi: 10.1080/00223980.1949.9917435
- Howes, D. H., & Solomon, R. L. (1951). Visual duration threshold as a function of word-probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41(6), 401. doi:10.1037/h0056020
- Hutchison, K. A., Balota, D. A., Neely, J. H., Cortese, M. J., Cohen-Shikora, E. R., Tse, C-S., … Buchanan, E. (2013). The semantic priming project. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1099–1114. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0304-z doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0304-z
- Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 643–650. http://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.3.643 doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.643
- Keuleers, E., Diependaele, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Practice effects in large-scale visual word recognition studies: A lexical decision study on 14,000 dutch mono- and disyllabic words and nonwords. Frontiers in Psychology, 1. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00174 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00174
- Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). The British lexicon project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 287–304. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0118-4 doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0118-4
- Keuleers, E., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Brysbaert, M. (2015). Word knowledge in the crowd: Measuring vocabulary size and word prevalence in a massive online experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1–28. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1022560
- Kučera, H., & Francis, N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
- Kuperman, V. (2015). Virtual experiments in megastudies: A case study of language and emotion. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1–18. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.989865 doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.989865
- Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4
- Kuperman, V., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2013). Reassessing word frequency as a determinant of word recognition for skilled and unskilled readers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0030859
- Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
- Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2015). How useful are corpus-based methods for extrapolating psycholinguistic variables? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1–20. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.988735 doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.988735
- Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., Wodniecka, Z., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). Subtlex-pl: Subtitle-based word frequency estimates for Polish. Behavior Research Methods. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0489-4
- Marelli, M., Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D. (2015). Semantic transparency in free stems: The effect of orthography-semantics consistency on word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1–13. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.959709
- Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2011). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 1–23. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6 doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6
- Munro, R., Bethard, S., Kuperman, V., Lai, V. T., Melnick, R., Potts, C., … Tily, H. (2010). Crowdsourcing and language studies: The new generation of linguistic data. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 workshop on creating speech and language data with Amazon's Mechanical Turk (pp. 122–130). Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1866715
- New, B., Brysbaert, M., Veronis, J., & Pallier, C. (2007). The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(04), 661–677. http://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640707035X doi: 10.1017/S014271640707035X
- Nusbaum, H. C., Pisoni, D. B., & Davis, C. K. (1984). Sizing up the Hoosier mental lexicon: Measuring the familiarity of 20,000 words. Research on Speech Perception Progress Report, 10(10), 357–376.
- Oostdijk, N. (2002). The design of the spoken Dutch Corpus. In P. Peters, P. Collins, & A. Smith (Eds.), New frontiers of corpus research (pp. 105–112). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
- Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76(1p2), 1–25. doi: 10.1037/h0025327
- Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model. Cognitive Psychology, 61(2), 106–151. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.04.001 doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.04.001
- Radeau, M., Mousty, P., & Content, A. (1990). Brulex. Une base de données lexicales informatisée pour le français écrit et parlé. L'année Psychologique, 90(4), 551–566. http://doi.org/10.3406/psy.1990.29428 doi: 10.3406/psy.1990.29428
- Recchia, G., & Louwerse, M. M. (2015). Reproducing affective norms with lexical co-occurrence statistics: Predicting valence, arousal, and dominance. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1–15. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.941296
- Schnoebelen, T., & Kuperman, V. (2010). Using Amazon Mechanical Turk for linguistic research. Psihologija, 43(4), 441–464. http://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1004441S doi: 10.2298/PSI1004441S
- Seidenberg, M. S., & Waters, G. S. (1989). Reading words aloud-a mega study. Retrieved from http://philpapers.org/rec/SEIRWA
- Sibley, D. E., Kello, C. T., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2009). Error, error everywhere: A look at megastudies of word reading. In Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1036–1041). Retrieved from http://cogmech.ucmerced.edu/pubs/SibleyETAL09-csproc.pdf
- Soares, A. P., Machado, J., Costa, A., Iriarte, Á., Simões, A., de Almeida, J. J., … Perea, M. (2014). On the advantages of word-frequency and contextual diversity measures extracted from subtitles: The case of Portuguese. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1–41. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.964271
- Spieler, D. H., & Balota, D. A. (1997). Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level. Psychological Science, 8, 411–416. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00453.x
- Spieler, D. H., & Balota, D. A. (2000). Factors influencing word naming in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 15(2), 225–231. http://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.15.2.225 doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.15.2.225
- Sze, W. P., Rickard Liow, S. J., & Yap, M. J. (2014). The Chinese lexicon project: A repository of lexical decision behavioral responses for 2,500 Chinese characters. Behavior Research Methods, 46(1), 263–273. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0355-9 doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0355-9
- Sze, W. P., Yap, M. J., & Rickard Liow, S. J. (2015). The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of Chinese characters: A megastudy analysis. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1–30. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.985234 doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.985234
- Szekely, A., Jacobsen, T., D'Amico, S., Devescovi, A., Andonova, E., Herron, D., … et al. (2004). A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(2), 247–250. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.03.002
- Taikh, A., Hargreaves, I. S., Yap, M. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2015). Semantic classification of pictures and words. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1–17. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.975728
- Thorndike, E. L., & Lorge, I. (1944). The teacher's word book of 30,000 words. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(2), 107–136. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.107
- Van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1176–1190. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.850521 doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.850521
- Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1191–1207. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x
- Westbury, C., Keith, J., Briesemeister, B. B., Hofmann, M. J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Avoid violence, rioting, and outrage; approach celebration, delight, and strength: Using large text corpora to compute valence, arousal, and the basic emotions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1–24. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.970204
- Wood, S. (2006). Generalized additive models: An introduction with R. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press.
- Yap, M. J., Balota, D. A., Sibley, D. E., & Ratcliff, R. (2012). Individual differences in visual word recognition: Insights from the English Lexicon Project. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(1), 53–79. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0024177
- Yap, M. J., Liow, S. J. R., Jalil, S. B., & Faizal, S. S. B. (2010). The Malay Lexicon Project: A database of lexical statistics for 9,592 words. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 992–1003. http://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.992 doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.4.992
- Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., & Yap, M. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart's N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(5), 971–979. http://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.5.971 doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.971
- Ziegler, J. C., Tan, L. H., Perry, C., & Montant, M. (2000). Phonology matters: The phonological frequency effect in written Chinese. Psychological Science, 11(3), 234–238. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00247