The degree of disparateness of event details modulates future simulation construction, plausibility, and recall

REFERENCES

• Addis, D. R., Cheng, T., Roberts, R. P., & Schacter, D. L. (2011). Hippocampal contributions to the episodic simulation of specific and general future events. Hippocampus, 21, 1045–1052. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20870
   Google Scholar
• Addis, D. R., Pan, L., Vu, M., Laiser, N., & Schacter, D. L. (2009). Constructive episodic simulation of the future and the past: Distinct subsystems of a core brain network mediate imagining and remembering. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2222–2238. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.026
   Google Scholar
• Addis, D. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008). Constructive episodic simulation: Temporal distance and detail of past and future events modulate hippocampal engagement. Hippocampus, 18, 227–237. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20405
   Google Scholar
• Bar, M. (2009). The proactive brain: Memory for predictions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1235–1243. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0310
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, D. M., Godfrey, R. D., & Loftus, E. F. (2009). False memories: The role of plausibility and autobiographical belief. In K. D. Markman, W. M. P. Klein, & J. A. Suhr (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. 89–102). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• D'Argembeau, A., & Van der Linden, M. (2004). Phenomenal characteristics associated with projecting oneself back into the past and forward into the future: Influence of valence and temporal distance. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 844–858. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2004.07.007
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, G. O., Lackey, S., & McDaniel, M. A. (1989). Bizarre imagery, interference, and distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 15(1), 137–146. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.15.1.137
   Google Scholar
• Hassabis, D., Kumaran, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2007). Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(52), 14365–14374. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4549-07.2007
   Google Scholar
• Hirshman, E., Whelley, M. M., & Palij, M. (1989). An investigation of paradoxical memory effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(5), 594–609. doi:10.1016/0749-596x(89)90015-6
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88(1), 67–85. doi:10.1037//0033-295x.88.1.67
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. K., Suengas, A. G., Foley, M. A., & Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(4), 371–376. doi:10.1037//0096-3445.117.4.371
   Google Scholar
• Kirchhoff, B. A., Wagner, A. D., Maril, A., & Stern, C. E. (2000). Prefrontal-temporal circuitry for episodic encoding and subsequent memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(16), 6173–6180.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, S. B., Robertson, T. E., Delton, A. W., & Lax, M. L. (2012). Familiarity and personal experience as mediators of recall when planning for future contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 38(1), 240–245. doi:10.1037/a0025200
   Google Scholar
• Knight, R. T. (1996). Contribution of human hippocampal region to novelty detection. Nature, 383, 256–259. doi: 10.1038/383256a0
   Google Scholar
• Martin, V. C., Schacter, D. L., Corballis, M. C., & Addis, D. R. (2011). A role for the hippocampus in encoding simulations of future events. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(33), 13858–13863. doi:10.1073/pnas.1105816108
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (1986). Bizarre imagery as an effective memory aid: The importance of distinctiveness. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 12(1), 54–65.
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, I. M., & Gallo, D. A. (2010). Separating past and future autobiographical events in memory: Evidence for a reality monitoring asymmetry. Memory & Cognition, 38(1), 3–12. doi:10.3758/mc.38.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Poppenk, J., Köhler, S., & Moscovitch, M. (2010). Revisiting the novelty effect: When familiarity, not novelty, enhances memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 36(5), 1321–1330. doi:10.1037/a0019900
   Google Scholar
• Poppenk, J., McIntosh, A. R., Craik, F. I. M., & Moscovitch, M. (2010). Past experience modulates the neural mechanisms of episodic memory formation. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(13), 4707–4716. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5466-09.2010
   Google Scholar
• Poppenk, J., & Norman, K. A. (2012). Mechanisms supporting superior source memory for familiar items: A multi-voxel pattern analysis study. Neuropsychologia, 50, 3015–3026. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.010
   Google Scholar
• Shohamy, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2008). Integrating memories in the human brain: Hippocampal-midbrain encoding of overlapping events. Neuron, 60(2), 378–389. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.023
   Google Scholar
• Szpunar, K. K., Addis, D. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2012). Memory for emotional simulations: Remembering a rosy future. Psychological Science, 23(1), 24–29. doi:10.1177/0956797611422237
   Google Scholar
• Tulving, E., Markowitsch, H. J., Craik, F. I. M., Habib, R., & Houle, S. (1996). Novelty and familiarity activations in PET studies of memory encoding and retrieval. Cerebral Cortex, 6(1), 71–79. doi: 10.1093/cercor/6.1.71
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
   Google Scholar
• van Mulukom, V., Schacter, D. L., Corballis, M. C., & Addis, D. R. (2013). Re-imagining the future: Repetition decreases hippocampal involvement in future simulation. PLoS One, 8(7), e69596. Retrieved from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0069596 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069596
   Google Scholar
• Weiler, J. A., Suchan, B., & Daum, I. (2010). Foreseeing the future: Occurrence probability of imagined future events modulates hippocampal activation. Hippocampus, 20(6), 685–690. doi:10.1002/hipo.20695
   Google Scholar
• Weiler, J. A., Suchan, B., & Daum, I. (2011). What comes first? Electrophysiological differences in the temporal course of memory and future thinking. European Journal of Neuroscience, 33(9), 1742–1750. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07630.x
   Google Scholar
• Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Leboe, J. P. (2003). Two fluency heuristics (and how to tell them apart). Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 62–79. doi:10.1016/s0749-596x(03)00009-3
   Google Scholar