Developmental changes in misinterpretation of garden-path wh-questions in French

REFERENCES

• Aoshima, S., Phillips, C., & Weinberg, A. (2004). Processing filler-gap dependencies in a head-final language. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 23–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, L. L-S., & Rooryck, J. (2000). Licensing Wh-in-situ. Syntax, 3(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1111/1467-9612.00022
   Google Scholar
• Choi, Y., & Trueswell, J. C. (2010). Children's (in)ability to recover from garden paths in a verb-final language: Evidence for developing control in sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106, 41–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J. F., & Ferreira, F. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 368–407. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0752
   Google Scholar
• Crain, S., & Fodor, J. D. (1985). How can grammars help parsers. In D. R. Dowty, L. Karttunen, & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives (pp. 94–128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Villiers, J., Roeper, T., Bland-Stewart, L., & Pearson, B. (2008). Answering hard questions: Wh-movement across dialects and disorder. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 67–103. doi: 10.1017/S0142716408080041
   Google Scholar
• De Villiers, J., Roeper, T., & Vainikka, A. (1990). The acquisition of long-distance rules. In L. Frazier & J. De Villiers (Eds.), Language processing and language acquisition (pp. 257–297). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, A. (2013). Ibex farm. Retrieved from http://spellout.net/ibexfarm/
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47(2), 164–203. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00005-7
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1991). Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 725–745. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90034-H
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1998). Syntactic reanalysis, thematic processing, and sentence comprehension. In J. D. Fodor & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, Volume 21 (pp. 73–100). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Patson, N. D. (2007). The ‘good enough’ approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 71–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00007.x
   Google Scholar
• Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: The processing of German WH-questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 250–272. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00004-9
   Google Scholar
• Fine, A. B., Jaeger, T. F., Farmer, T. A., & Qian, T. (2013). Rapid expectation adaptation during syntactic comprehension. PLoS ONE, 8(10), 1–18. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077661
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. D., & Inoue, A. (1994). The diagnosis and cure of garden paths. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23(5), 407–434. doi: 10.1007/BF02143947
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. D., & Inoue, A. (1998). Attach anyway. In J. D. Fodor & Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 101–141). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. D., & Inoue, A. (2000). Syntactic features in reanalysis: Positive and negative symptoms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(1), 25–36. doi: 10.1023/A:1005168206061
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. Jr. (1998). Sentence reanalysis, and visibility. In J. D. Fodor & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 143–176). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, L. & Flores d'Arcais, G. B. F. (1989). Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 331–344. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90037-5
   Google Scholar
• Garnsey, S. M., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Chapman, R. M. (1989). Evoked potentials and the study of sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 51–60. doi: 10.1007/BF01069046
   Google Scholar
• Gerken, L. (2006). Decisions, decisions: Infant language learning when multiple generalizations are possible. Cognition, 98(3), B67–B74. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1), 1–76. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, R. L. (2002). Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science, 13, 431–436. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00476
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Levine, W. H. (2002). Memory-load interference in syntactic processing. Psychological Science, 13(5), 425–430. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00475
   Google Scholar
• Hale, J. (2003). The information conveyed by words in sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(2), 101–123. doi: 10.1023/A:1022492123056
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. T., Zheng, X., Meng, X., & Snedeker, J. (2013). Children's assignment of grammatical roles in the online processing of Mandarin passive sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 589–606. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Hurewitz, F., Brown-Schmidt, S., Thorpe, K., Gleitman, L. R., & Trueswell, J. C. (2000). One frog, two frog, red frog, blue frog: Factors affecting children's syntactic choices in production and comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 597–626. doi: 10.1023/A:1026468209238
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   Google Scholar
• Kaschak, M. P., & Glenberg, A. M. (2004). This construction needs learned. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 133(3), 450–467. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.450
   Google Scholar
• King, J., & Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory* 1. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(5), 580–602. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90027-H
   Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2014). lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linearmixed effect models. R Package Version 2.0–11. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest.
   Google Scholar
• Lassotta, R., Omak, A., Panizza, D., Villata, S., & Franck, J. (2015). Linking cognitive control and syntactic revision of garden-path wh-questions in adults and children. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, B., & Rappaport-Hovav, M. R. (1995). Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, R. (2008). A noisy-channel model of rational human sentence comprehension under uncertain input. Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 234–243.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. L. (1998). Reanalysis and limited repair parsing: Leaping off the garden path. In F. Ferreira & J. D. Fodor (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 247–286). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Love, T. E. (2007). The processing of non-canonically ordered constituents in long distance dependencies by pre-school children: A real-time investigation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 191–206. doi: 10.1007/s10936-006-9040-9
   Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. (1975). Sentence perception as an interactive parallel process. Science, 189, 226–228. doi: 10.1126/science.189.4198.226
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu, E. (2004). The mapping of form and interpretation: The case of optional wh-movement in french. Lingua, 114(9–10), 1090–1132. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2003.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Maye, J., Werker, J. F., & Gerken, L. (2002). Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition, 82, B101–B111. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00157-3
   Google Scholar
• Mazuka, R., Jincho, N., & Oishi, H. (2009). Development of executive control and language processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 59–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00102.x
   Google Scholar
• Meroni, L., & Crain, S. (2003). On not being led down the kindergarten path. In B. Beachley, A. Brown, & F. Conlin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th boston university conference on language development (pp. 531–544). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, L. L. (2007). WH-interrogatives in spoken French: A corpus-based analysis of their form and function. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Novick, J. M., Hussey, E., Teubner-Rhodes, S., Harbison, J. I., & Bunting, M. F. (2013). Clearing the garden-path: Improving sentence processing through cognitive control training. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(2), 186–217. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2012.758297
   Google Scholar
• Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2005). Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of broca's area in sentence comprehension. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 263–281. doi: 10.3758/CABN.5.3.263
   Google Scholar
• Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2010). Broca's area and language processing: Evidence for the cognitive control connection. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4, 906–924. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00244.x
   Google Scholar
• Oiry, M. (2010). A case of true optionality: Wh-in-situ patterns like long movement in French. In A. Roussou & C. Vlachos (Eds.), The optionality of wh-Movement. Linguistic Analysis, 37(1–2), 112–136.
   Google Scholar
• Omaki, A., Davidson White, I., Goro, T., Lidz, J., & Phillips, C. (2014). No fear of commitment: Children's incremental interpretation in English and Japanese wh questions. Language Learning and Development, 0, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Omaki, A., & Lidz, J. (2015). Linking parser development to acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Language Acquisition, 22, 158–192. doi: 10.1080/10489223.2014.943903
   Google Scholar
• Omaki, A., & Schulz, B. (2011). Filler-gap dependencies and island constraints in second-language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 563–588. doi: 10.1017/S0272263111000313
   Google Scholar
• Perlmutter, D. (1978). Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Proceedings of the fourth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, pp. 157–189.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, C., & Wagers, M. (2007). Relating structure and time in linguistics and psycholinguistics. In G. Gaskell (Ed.), Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 739–756). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, L., Marinis, T., Felser, C., & Clahsen, H. (2007). Antecedent priming at trace positions in children's sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 175–188. doi: 10.1007/s10936-006-9038-3
   Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, New Series, 274, 1926–1928.
   Google Scholar
• Schütze, C. T., & Sprouse, J. (2013). Judgment data. In R. J. Podesva & D. Sharma (Eds.), Research methods in linguistics (pp. 27–50). Cambridge: Cambride University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slattery, T. J., Sturt, P., Christianson, K., Yoshida, M., & Ferreira, F. (2013). Lingering misinterpretations of garden path sentences arise from competing syntactic representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(2), 104–120. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Snedeker, J. (2013). Children's sentence processing. In R. P. G. van Gompel (Ed.), Sentence processing (pp. 189–220). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staub, A. (2007). The return of the repressed: Abandoned parses facilitate syntactic reanalysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(2), 299–323. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Stowe, A. (1986). Parsing wh-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 227–245. doi: 10.1080/01690968608407062
   Google Scholar
• Sturt, P. (2007). Semantic re-interpretation and garden path recovery. Cognition, 105, 477–488. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.009
   Google Scholar
• Sussman, R. S., & Sedivy, J. (2003). The time-course of processing syntactic dependencies: Evidence from eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(2), 143–163. doi: 10.1080/01690960143000498
   Google Scholar
• Tabor, W., Galantucci, B., & Richardson, D. (2004). Effects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 355–370. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, K., Spivey-Knowlton, J., Eberhard, M., & Sedivy, C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634. doi: 10.1126/science.7777863
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, S. P., & Newport, E. L. (2007). Statistical learning of syntax: The role of transitional probability. Language Learning and Development, 3(1), 1–42. doi: 10.1080/15475440709336999
   Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., & Pickering, M. J. (1996). Plausibility and the processing of unbounded dependencies: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 454–475. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.0025
   Google Scholar
• Trueswell, J. C., & Gleitman, L. R. (2007). Learning to parse and its implications for language acquisition. In Gaskell (Ed.), Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 635–656). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73, 89–134. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00032-3
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, S. (2013). Assessing the role of current and cumulative exposure in simultaneous bilingual acquisition: The case of Dutch gender. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 86–110. doi: 10.1017/S1366728912000284
   Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, J. A., & McElree, B. (2006). Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 157–166. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.007
   Google Scholar
• van Gompel, R. P. G., Pickering, M. J., Pearson, J., & Jacob, G. (2006). The activation of inappropriate analyses in garden-path sentences: Evidence from structural priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(3), 335–362. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.06.004
   Google Scholar
• Wagers, M. W., & Phillips, C. (2014). Going the distance: Memory and control processes in active dependency construction. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(7), 1274–1304. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.858363
   Google Scholar
• Weighall, A. R. (2008). The kindergarten path effect revisited: Children's use of context in processing structural ambiguities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99, 75–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.10.004
   Google Scholar
• Xiang, M., Dillon, B., Wagers, M., Liu, F. Q., & Guo, T. M. (2014). Processing covert dependencies:An SAT study on Mandarin wh-in-situ questions. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 23, 207–232. doi: 10.1007/s10831-013-9115-1
   Google Scholar