176
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The importance of understanding: Model space moderates goal specificity effects

, , &
Pages 1179-1196 | Received 21 Jan 2015, Accepted 21 Jul 2015, Published online: 27 Oct 2015

References

  • Ayres, P. L. (1993). Why goal-free problems can facilitate learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 376–381. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1993.1027
  • Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (1990). Locus of difficulty in multistage mathematics problems. The American Journal of Psychology, 103(2), 167–193. doi: 10.2307/1423141
  • Burns, B. D., & Vollmeyer, R. (2000). Problem solving: Phenomena in search of a thesis. In L. Gleitman & A. K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-second annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 627–632). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Burns, B. D., & Vollmeyer, R. (2002). Goal specificity effects on hypothesis testing in problem solving. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A(1), 241–261. doi: 10.1080/02724980143000262
  • Geddes, B. W., & Stevenson, R. J. (1997). Explicit learning of a dynamic system with a non-salient pattern. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A(4), 742–765. doi: 10.1080/713755739
  • Kaplan, C. A., & Simon, H. A. (1990). In search of insight. Cognitive Psychology, 22(3), 374–419. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(90)90008-R
  • Kistner, S., Burns, B. D., Vollmeyer, R., & Kortenkamp, U. (2014). An explorative study of search of model space in problem solving. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(7), 818–829. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2014.960872
  • Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12(1), 1–48. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1201_1
  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Künsting, J., Wirth, J., & Paas, F. (2011). The goal specificity effect on strategy use and instructional efficiency during computer-based scientific discovery learning. Computers & Education, 56(3), 668–679. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.009
  • Ohlsson, S. (1992). Information-processing explanations of insight and related phenomena. In M. T. Keane & K. J. Gilhooly (Eds.), Advances in the psychology of thinking (pp. 1–44). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  • Osman, M., & Heyes, C. (2005). Practice doesńt always make perfect: Goal induced decrements in the accuracy of action- and observation-based problem solving. In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1690–1695). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Owen, E., & Sweller, J. (1985). What do students learn while solving mathematics problems? Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 272–284. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.77.3.272
  • Paas, F., Camp, G., & Rikers, R. (2001). Instructional compensation for age-related cognitive declines: Effects of goal specificity in maze learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 181–186. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.181
  • Paas, F., & Kirschner, F. (2012). The goal-free effect. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 1375–1377). Netherlands: Springer.
  • Pretz, J. E., & Zimmerman, C. (2009). When the goal gets in the way: The interaction of goal specificity and task difficulty. Thinking & Reasoning, 15(4), 405–430. doi: 10.1080/13546780903364637
  • Richter-Gebert, J., & Kortenkamp, U. H. (1999). The interactive geometry software Cinderella. Berlin: Springer.
  • Schauble, L., Klopfer, L. E., & Raghavan, K. (1991). Students’ transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 859–882. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660280910
  • Schunn, C. D., & Klahr, D. (1995). A 4-space model of scientific discovery. In J. D. Moore & J. F. Lehman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 106–111). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Simon, H. A., & Lea, G. (1974). Problem solving and rule induction: A unified view. In L. W. Gregg (Ed.), Knowledge and cognition (pp. 105–127). Potomac, Md: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
  • Sweller, J. (2009). Cognitive bases of human creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 21(1), 11–19. doi: 10.1007/s10648-008-9091-6
  • Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Sweller, J., & Levine, M. (1982). Effects goal specificity on means-ends analysis and learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8(5), 463–474.
  • Vollmeyer, R., & Burns, B. D. (1996). Hypothese-ninstruktion und Zielspezifität: Bedingungen die das Erlernen und Kontrollieren eines komplexen Systems beeinflussen [Hypothesis instruction and goal specificity: Determinants of learning and controlling a complex system]. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 43(4), 657–683.
  • Vollmeyer, R., & Burns, B. D. (2002). Goal specificity and learning with a hypermedia program. Experimental Psychology, 49(2), 98–108. doi: 10.1027//1618-3169.49.2.98
  • Vollmeyer, R., Burns, B. D., & Holyoak, K. J. (1996). The impact of goal specificity on strategy use and acquisition of problem structure. Cognitive Science, 20, 75–100. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2001_3
  • Wirth, J., Künsting, J., & Leutner, D. (2009). The impact of goal specificity and goal type on learning outcome and cognitive load. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 299–305. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.004
  • Woodworth, R. S., & Schlosberg, H. (1954). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  • Youssef-Shalala, A., Ayres, P., Schubert, C., & Sweller, J. (2014). Using a general problem-solving strategy to promote transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20, 215–231.
  • Zanga, A., Richard, J. -F., & Tijus, C. (2004). Implicit learning in rule induction and problem solving. Thinking & Reasoning, 10(1), 55–83. doi: 10.1080/13546780342000034
  • Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20, 99–149. doi: 10.1006/drev.1999.0497

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.