Perspective taking in referring to objects behind versus in front of an observer: Frames of reference, intraindividual consistency, and response latencies

REFERENCES

• Abkarian, G. G. (1982). Comprehension of deictic locatives: The object “behind” it. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 11, 229–245. doi: 10.1007/BF01067566
   Google Scholar
• Beller, S., Singmann, H., Hüther, L., & Bender, A. (2015). Turn around to have a look? Spatial referencing in dorsal vs. frontal settings in cross-linguistic comparison. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1283), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, A., & Beller, S. (2014). Mapping spatial frames of reference onto time: A review of theoretical accounts and empirical findings. Cognition, 132, 342–382. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.016
   Google Scholar
• Bender, A., Beller, S., & Bennardo, G. (2010). Temporal frames of reference: Conceptual analysis and empirical evidence from German, English, Mandarin Chinese, and Tongan. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10, 283–307. doi: 10.1163/156853710X531195
   Google Scholar
• Bender, A., Rothe-Wulf, A., Hüther, L., & Beller, S. (2012). Moving forward in space and time: How strong is the conceptual link between spatial and temporal frames of reference (FoRs)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(486), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Bennardo, G. (2000). Language and space in Tonga: “The front of the house is where the chief sits”. Anthropological Linguistics, 42, 499–544.
   Google Scholar
• Bennardo, G. (2009). Language, space and social relationships: A foundational cultural model in Polynesia. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnemeyer, J., & O'Meara, C. (2012). Vectors and frames of reference: Evidence from Seri and Yucatec. In L. Filipović & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures (pp. 217–249). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1996). The influence of functional relations on spatial term selection. Psychological Science, 7, 56–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00667.x
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1–39. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(86)90010-7
   Google Scholar
• Clark-Carter, D. (2004). Quantitative psychological research: A student’s handbook. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M. V. (1981). Interpretation of the spatial prepositions ‘in front of’ and ‘behind’. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 4, 359–368. doi: 10.1177/016502548100400304
   Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., & Brannon, E. M. (2010). Space, time, and number: A Kantian research program. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 517–519. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.009
   Google Scholar
• Duran, N. D., Dale, R., & Kreuz, R. J. (2011). Listeners invest in an assumed other's perspective despite cognitive costs. Cognition, 121, 22–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.06.009
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, S., Letts, C., & Sinka, I. (2011). The new Reynell developmental language scale. London, UK: GL Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Grabowski, J. (1999). A uniform anthropomorphological approach to the human conception of dimensional relations. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 1, 349–363. doi: 10.1023/A:1010031428440
   Google Scholar
• Grabowski, J., & Miller, G. A. (2000). Factors affecting the use of dimensional prepositions in German and American English: Object orientation, social context, and prepositional pattern. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 517–553. doi: 10.1023/A:1005124210205
   Google Scholar
• Grabowski, J., & Weiß, P. (1996). Determinanten der Interpretation dimensionaler Lokalisationsäußerungen: Experimente in fünf Sprachen [Determinants of interpreting dimensional localization expressions: Experiments in five languages]. Sprache & Kognition, 15, 234–250.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L. J., & Strommen, E. A. (1972). The role of front-back features in children's front, back, and besides placements of objects. Journal of Child Development, 18, 259–271.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C. A. (1978). Linguistic representation of spatial and temporal orientation. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 4, 524–538. doi: 10.3765/bls.v4i0.2202
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C. A. (1982). Up/down, front/back, left/right. A contrastive study of Hausa and English. In J. Weissenborn & W. Klein (Eds.), Here and there (pp. 13–42). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Janzen, G., Haun, D. B. M., & Levinson, S. C. (2012). Tracking down abstract linguistic meaning: Neural correlates of spatial frame of reference ambiguities in language. PLoS ONE, 7(2), e30657. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030657
   Google Scholar
• Johannsen, K., & De Ruiter, J. P. (2013). The role of scene type and priming in the processing and selection of a spatial frame of reference. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 182. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00182
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J. J. (1992). Analyzing qualitative data. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Majid, A., Bowerman, M., Kita, S., Haun, D. B. M., & Levinson, S. C. (2004). Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 108–114. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976). Language and perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Núñez, R. E., & Cooperrider, K. (2013). The tangle of space and time in human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 220–229. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.008
   Google Scholar
• Núñez, R. E., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them. Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30, 401–450. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_62
   Google Scholar
• O'Meara, C., & Báez, G. P. (2011). Spatial frames of reference in Mesoamerican languages. Language Sciences, 33, 837–852. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.013
   Google Scholar
• Rothe-Wulf, A., Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2015). Temporal frames of reference in three Germanic languages: Individual consistency, interindividual consensus, and cross-linguistic variability. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 917–939. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.970205
   Google Scholar
• Schober, M. F. (1993). Spatial perspective-taking in conversation. Cognition, 47, 1–24. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90060-9
   Google Scholar
• Schober, M. F. (1995). Speakers, addressees, and frames of references. Whose effort is minimized in conversations about locations? Discourse processes, 20, 219–247.
   Google Scholar
• Senft, G. (Ed.). (1997). Referring to space. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. 1: Conceptual structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tenbrink, T., Coventry, K. R., & Andonova, E. (2011). Spatial strategies in the description of complex configurations. Discourse Processes, 48, 237–266. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2010.549452
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, B., & Hard, B. M. (2009). Embodied and disembodied cognition: Spatial perspective-taking. Cognition, 110, 124–129. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.008
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, B., Lee, P., & Mainwaring, S. (1999). Why do speakers mix perspectives? Spatial Cognition and Computation, 1, 399–412. doi: 10.1023/A:1010091730257
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 483–488. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Wu, S., & Keysar, B. (2007). The effect of culture on perspective taking. Psychological Science, 18, 600–606. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01946.x
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. O., Koh, S., & Brown-Schmidt, S. (2012). Influence of perspective and goals on reference production in conversation. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 19, 699–707. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0262-6
   Google Scholar