Where do dialectal effects on speech processing come from? Evidence from a cross-dialect investigation

References

• Baayen, H., Davidson, D., & Bates, D. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, D., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2013). Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version: 1.0-5. Retrieved from http://cran.rproject.org/package=lme4
   Google Scholar
• Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues in cross-language speech research (pp. 167–200). Timonium, MD: York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In O. Bohn, & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Brunellière, A., Dufour, S., Nguyen, N., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2009). Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for the impact of regional variation on phoneme perception. Cognition, 111(3), 390–396.
   Google Scholar
• Clopper, C., & Pisoni, D. B. (2004). Some acoustic cues for the perceptual categorization of American English regional dialects. Journal of Phonetics, 32(1), 111–140.
   Google Scholar
• Connine, C. M., Blasko, D. G., & Titone, D. (1993). Do the beginnings of spoken words have a special status in auditory word recognition? Journal of Memory and Language, 32(2), 193–210.
   Google Scholar
• Conrey, B., Potts, G. F., & Niedzielski, N. A. (2005). Effects of dialect on merger perception: ERP and behavioral correlates. Brain and Language, 95(3), 435–449.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, A. (2012). Native listening: The flexibility dimension. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 169–187.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., Smits, R., & Cooper, N. (2005). Vowel perception: Effects of non-native language vs. non-native dialect. Speech Communication, 47(1-2), 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Deelman, T., & Connine, C. M. (2001). Missing information in spoken word recognition: Nonreleased stop consonants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(3), 656–663.
   Google Scholar
• Dufour, S., Brunellière, A., & Nguyen, N. (2013). To what extent do we hear phonemic contrasts in a non-native regional variety? Tracking the dynamics of perceptual processing with EEG. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42(2), 161–173.
   Google Scholar
• Dufour, S., Nguyen, N., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2007). The perception of phonemic contrasts in a non-native dialect. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(4), EL131–EL136.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, B., & Iverson, P. (2004). Vowel normalization for accent: An investigation of best exemplar locations in northern and southern British English sentences. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(1), 352–361.
   Google Scholar
• Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. (1995). Effects of age of second-language learning on the production of English consonants. Speech Communication, 16(1), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Floccia, C., Butler, J., Goslin, J., & Ellis, L. (2009). Regional and foreign accent processing in English: Can listeners adapt? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 38(4), 379–412.
   Google Scholar
• Floccia, C., Goslin, J., Girard, F., & Konopczynski, G. (2006). Does a regional accent perturb speech processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(5), 1276–1293.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, D. B., Abramson, A. S., Eimas, P. D., & Liberman, A. M. (1962). The identification and discrimination of synthetic vowels. Language and Speech, 5(4), 171–189.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1996). Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(1), 144–158.
   Google Scholar
• Gow, D. W. (2001). Assimilation and anticipation in continuous spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(1), 133–159.
   Google Scholar
• Gow, D. W. (2003). Feature parsing: Feature cue mapping in spoken word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(4), 575–590.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, J., & Drager, K. (2010). Stuffed toys and speech perception. Linguistics, 48(4), 865–892.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, J., Nolan, A., & Drager, K. (2006). From fush to feesh: Exemplar priming in speech perception. The linguistic review, 23(3), 351–379.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, J., Warren, P., & Drager, K. (2006). Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics, 34(4), 458–484.
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, J., & Park, S. G. (1997). Cross-language vowel perception and production by Japanese and Korean learners of English. Journal of Phonetics, 25(3), 343–370.
   Google Scholar
• Janson, T., & Schulman, R. (1983). Non-distinctive features and their use. Journal of Linguistics, 19(2), 321–336.
   Google Scholar
• Landa, J., Sarasola, I., & Salaburu, P. (2010). Euskal Hiztegiaren Maiztasun Egitura (EHME).
   Google Scholar
• Larraza, S.. (2009, December 3–4). Acquisition of phonology and Spanish-Basque bilinguals’ phonological systems. Proceedings of Colloque Jeunes Chercheurs en Acquisition du Langage, Lyon, France, pp. 102–106.
   Google Scholar
• Larraza, S., Samuel, A. G., & Oñederra, M. L. (in press). Listening to accented speech in a second language: First language and age of acquisition effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
   Google Scholar
• LoCasto, P. C., & Connine, C. M. (2002). Rule-governed missing information in spoken word recognition: Schwa vowel deletion. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(2), 208–219.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, B. (2012). The effect of perceptual salience on phonetic accommodation in cross-dialectal conversation in Spanish. Toronto: University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• McLennan, C. T., Luce, P. A., & Charles-Luce, J. (2003). Representation of lexical form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(4), 539–553.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90(2), 227–234.
   Google Scholar
• Mitterer, H., & Blomert, L. (2003). Coping with phonological assimilation in speech perception: Evidence for early compensation. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(6), 956–969.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52(3), 189–234.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, D., McQueen, J. M, & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(3), 299–325.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D. R., & Cutler, A. (1984). Segmental phonology and the perception of syntactic structure. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23(4), 450–466.
   Google Scholar
• Sebastian-Galles, N., & Soto-Faraco, S. (1999). Online processing of native and non-native phonemic contrasts in early bilinguals. Cognition, 72(2), 111–123.
   Google Scholar
• Stampe, D. (1979). A dissertation on natural phonology. New York: Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Sumner, M., & Samuel, A. G. (2005). Perception and representation of regular variation: The case of final /t/. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(3), 322–338.
   Google Scholar
• Sumner, M., & Samuel, A. G. (2009). The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(4), 487–501.
   Google Scholar