The influence of environmental context in interpersonal observation–execution

References

• Becchio, C., Manera, V., Sartori, L., Cavallo, A., & Castiello, U. (2012). Grasping intentions: From thought experiments to empirical evidence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00117
   Google Scholar
• Beisert, M., Zmyj, N., Liepelt, R., Jung, F., Prinz, W., & Daum, M. M. (2012). Rethinking ‘rational imitation’ in 14-month-old infants: A perceptual distraction approach. PLoS ONE, 7, e32563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032563
   Google Scholar
• Bisio, A., Stucchi, N., Jacono, M., Fadiga, L., & Pozzo, T. (2010). Automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: Effect of visual context and stimulus velocity. PLoS ONE, 5, e13506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013506
   Google Scholar
• Blakemore, S. J., & Frith, C. (2005). The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action. Neuropsychologia, 43, 260–267. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.11.012
   Google Scholar
• Csibra, G. (2007). Action mirroring and action understanding: An alternative account. In P. Haggard, Y. Rossetti, & M. Kawato (Eds.), Sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition, attention and performance: Attention and performance XXII (pp. 435–59). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2007). ‘Obsessed with goals’: Functions and mechanisms of teleological interpretation of action actions in humans. Acta Psychologica, 124, 60–78. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.09.007
   Google Scholar
• Frischen, A., Loach, D., & Tipper, S. P. (2009). Seeing the world through another person's eyes: Simulating selective attention via action observation. Cognition, 111, 212–218. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Gergely, G., Bekkering, H., & Király, I. (2002). Developmental psychology: Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature, 415, 755. doi: 10.1038/415755a
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, D., & Tipper, S. P. (2009). Priming reach trajectory when observing actions: Hand – centred effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 2450–2470. doi: 10.1080/17470210903103059
   Google Scholar
• Hardwick, R. M., & Edwards, M. G. (2011). Observed reach trajectory influences executed reach kinematics in prehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1082–1093. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.538068
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. J., Roberts, J. W., Elliott, D., & Bennett, S. J. (2014). Top-down attentional processes modulate coding of atypical biological motion kinematics in the absence of motor signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1641–1653.
   Google Scholar
• Heyes, C. (2011). Automatic imitation. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 463–483. doi: 10.1037/a0022288
   Google Scholar
• Heyes, C. M., & Bird, G. (2007). Mirroring, association and the correspondence problem. In P. Haggard, Y. Rossetti, & M. Kawato (Eds.), Sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition, attention and performance: Attention and performance XXII (pp. 461–79). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X01000103
   Google Scholar
• Howard, L. A., & Tipper, S. P. (1997). Hand deviations away from visual cues: Indirect evidence for inhibition. Experimental Brain Research, 113, 144–152. doi: 10.1007/BF02454150
   Google Scholar
• Keulen, R. F., Adam, J. J., Fischer, M. H., Kupers, H., & Jolles, J. (2002). Selective reaching: evidence for multiple frames of reference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 515–526.
   Google Scholar
• Kilner, J. M., Hamilton, A. F., & Blakemore, S. J. (2007). Interference effect of observed human movement on action is due to velocity profile of biological motion. Social Neuroscience, 2, 158–166. doi: 10.1080/17470910701428190
   Google Scholar
• Kilner, J. M., Paulignan, Y., & Blakemore, S. J. (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology, 13, 522–525. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00165-9
   Google Scholar
• Liepelt, R., Cramon, D. Y., & Brass, M. (2008). What is matched in direct matching? Intention attribution modulates motor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 578–591.
   Google Scholar
• Mattar, A. A. G., & Gribble, P. L. (2005). Motor learning by observing. Neuron, 46, 153–160. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.02.009
   Google Scholar
• Miles, L. K., Nind, L. K., Henderson, Z., & Macrae, N. (2010). Moving memories: Behavioural synchrony and memory for self and others. Journal of Experiment Social Psychology, 46, 457–460. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.006
   Google Scholar
• Oberman, L. M., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2007). The simulating social mind: The role of the mirror neuron system and simulation in the social and communicative deficits of autism spectrum disorders. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 310–327. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.310
   Google Scholar
• Ondobaka, S., de Lange, F. P., Newman-Norlund, R. D., Wiemens, M., & Bekkering, H. (2012). Interplay between action and movement intention during social interaction. Psychological Science, 23, 30–35. doi: 10.1177/0956797611424163
   Google Scholar
• Ondobaka, S., Newman-Norlund, R. D., de Lange, F. P., & Bekkering, H. (2013). Action recognition depends on observer's level of action control and social personality traits. PLoS ONE, 8, e81392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081392
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, M., Hunnius, S., & Bekkering, H. (2013). Examining functional mechanisms of imitative learning in infancy: Does teleological reasoning affect infants’ imitation beyond motor resonance? Journal of Experiment Child Psychology, 116, 487–498. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.009
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, M., Hunnius, S., Vissers, M., & Bekkering, H. (2011a). Bridging the gap between the other and me: The functional role of motor resonance and action effects in infants’ imitation. Developmental Science, 14, 901–910. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01040.x
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, M., Hunnius, S., Vissers, M., & Bekkering, H. (2011b). Imitation in infancy: Rational or motor resonance? Child Development, 82, 1047–1057. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01610.x
   Google Scholar
• Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154. doi: 10.1080/713752551
   Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 661–670. doi: 10.1038/35090060
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. W., Bennett, S. J., & Hayes, S. J. (2015). Top-down social modulation of interpersonal observation-execution. Psychological Research. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1007/s00426-015-0666-9
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. W., Hayes, S. J., Uji, M., & Bennett, S. J. (2015). Motor Contagion: Dissociating the effects of movement trajectory and end-state goals. Psychological Research, 79, 621–629. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0589-x
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, L., Xompero, F., Bucchioni, G., & Castiello, U. (2012). The transfer of motor functional strategies via action-observation. Biology Letters, 8, 193–196. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0759
   Google Scholar
• Spengler, S., Brass, M., Kühn, S., & Schütz-Bosbach, S. (2010). Minimizing motor mimicry by myself: Self-focus enhances online action-control mechanisms during motor contagion. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 98–106. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.014
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, J., Gowen, E., & Miall, R. C. (2007). Effects of agency on movement interference during observation of a moving dot stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 915–926. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.915
   Google Scholar
• Tipper, S. P., Lortie, C., & Bayliss, G. C. (1992). Selective reaching: Evidence for action-centered attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 891–905.
   Google Scholar
• Tresilian, J. R. (1999). Selective attention in reaching: When is an object not a distractor? Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 407–408. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01390-X
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, T. N., & Elliott, D. (2004). Movement trajectories in the presence of a distracting stimulus: Evidence for a response activation model of selective reaching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 1031–1057. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000666
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, T. N., Elliott, D., & Weeks, D. J. (1999). Hand deviations toward distractors. Evidence for response competition. Experimental Brain Research, 127, 207–212. doi: 10.1007/s002210050790
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, T. N., & McDougall, L. M. (2012). Negative priming in a joint selection task. PLoS ONE, 7, e42963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042963
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, T. N., & Weeks, D. (2010). Visual selective attention and action. In D. Elliott & M. Khan (Eds.), Vision and goal-directed movement: Neurobehavioral perspectives (pp. 39–58). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Wild, K. S., Poliakoff, E., Jerrison, A., & Gowen, E. (2010). The influence of goals on movement kinematics during imitation. Experimental Brain Research, 204, 353–360. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2034-8
   Google Scholar