Additivity of semantic and phonological effects: Evidence from speech production in Mandarin

REFERENCES

• Balota, D. A., & Paul, S. T. (1996). Summation of activation: Evidence from multiple primes that converge and diverge within semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 827–845.
   Google Scholar
• Bi, Y. C., Xu, Y. D., & Caramazza, A. (2009). Orthographic and phonological effects in the picture-word interference paradigm: Evidence from a logographic language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 637–658. doi: 10.1017/S0142716409990051
   Google Scholar
• Chen, T.-M., Dell, G. S., & Chen, J.-Y. (2004). A cross-linguistic study of phonological units: Syllables emerge from the statistics of Mandarin Chinese but not from the statistics of English. Proceedings of the 26th Annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 216–220.
   Google Scholar
• Chinese Linguistic Data Consortium. (2003). 现代汉语通用词表 [Chinese lexicon] (CLDC-LAC-2003-001). Beijing, China: Tsinghua University, State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Technology and Systems, and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Automation.
   Google Scholar
• Cholin, J., Levelt, W. J., & Schiller, N. O. (2006). Effects of syllable frequency in speech production. Cognition, 99, 205–235. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.009
   Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., & Martin, R. C. (1999). Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 345–361.
   Google Scholar
• DeFrancis, J. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
   Google Scholar
• Dell'Acqua, R., Sessa, P., Peressotti, F., Mulatti, C., Navarrete, E., & Grainger, J. (2010). ERP evidence for ultra-fast semantic processing in the picture–word interference paradigm. Frontiers in psychology, 1, 177. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00177
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, W. R., & Düngelhoff, F. J. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(5), 640–654.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, G.W., Riddoch, M.J., & Quinlan, P.T. (1988). Cascade processing in picture identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 67–104. doi: 10.1080/02643298808252927
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., & Wheeldon, L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50, 239–269. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90030-2
   Google Scholar
• Lupker, S. J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 485–495. doi: 10.3758/BF03198265
   Google Scholar
• Lupker, S. J. (1982). The role of phonetic and orthographic similarity in picture-word interference. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 349–367. doi: 10.1037/h0080652
   Google Scholar
• Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 503–535.
   Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Warren, P. (1994). Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: Words, phonemes, and features. Psychological Review, 101, 653–675. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.653
   Google Scholar
• Masson, M. E. (2011). A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 679–690. doi: 10.3758/s13428-010-0049-5
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
   Google Scholar
• Melinger, A., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2004). Investigating the interplay between semantic and phonological distractor effects in picture naming. Brain and Language, 90, 213–220. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00434-6
   Google Scholar
• Melinger, A., & Koenig, J.-P. (2007). Part-of-speech persistence: The influence of part-of-speech information on lexical processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 472–489. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. S., & Schriefers, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 1146–1160.
   Google Scholar
• Morsella, E., & Miozzo, M. (2002). Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 555–563.
   Google Scholar
• O'Seaghdha, P. G., Chen, J.-Y., & Chen, T.-M. (2010). Proximate units in word production: Phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English. Cognition, 115, 282–302. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Pechmann, T., & Garrett, M., & Zerbst, D. (2004). The time course of recovery for grammatical category information during lexical processing for syntactic construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 723–728.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (1998). The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 101–118.
   Google Scholar
• Posnansky, C. J., & Rayner, K. (1978). Visual vs. phonemic contributions to importance of initial letter in word identification. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 188–190. doi: 10.3758/BF03336803
   Google Scholar
• Raftery, A. E. (1999). Bayes factors and BIC: Comment on “A critique of the Bayesian information criterion for model selection”. Sociological Methods & Research, 27, 411–427. doi: 10.1177/0049124199027003005
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Springer, C. J. (1986). Graphemic and semantic similarity effects in the picture word interference task. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 207–222. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb01995.x
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107–142. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90041-F
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249–284. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00027-9
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2004). Comprehension-based versus production-internal feedback in planning spoken words: A rejoinder to Rapp and Goldrick (2004). Psychological Review, 111, 579–580. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.579
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2015). Modeling of phonological encoding in spoken word production: From Germanic languages to Mandarin Chinese and Japanese. Japanese Psychological Research, 57, 22–37. doi:10.1111/jpr.12050
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1996). Interaction between semantic and orthographic factors in conceptually driven naming: Comment on Starreveld and La Heij (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 246–251. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.1.246
   Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86–102. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(90)90011-N
   Google Scholar
• Spinks, J. A., Liu, Y., Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (2000). Reading Chinese characters for meaning: The role of phonological information. Cognition, 76, B1–B11. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(90)90011-N
   Google Scholar
• Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1995). Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 686–698. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.686
   Google Scholar
• Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1996a). The locus of orthographic-phonological facilitation: Reply to Roelofs, Meyer, and Levelt (1996). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 252–255. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.1.252
   Google Scholar
• Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1996b). Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 896–918. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.4.896
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J., & Burke, D. (2002). Asymmetric aging effects on semantic and phonological processes: Naming in the picture-word interference task. Psychology and Aging, 17, 662–676. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.17.4.662
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, G., & Briggs, P. (1984). The development of word recognition processes. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 243–255. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1984.tb01896.x
   Google Scholar
• Wong, A. W. K., & Chen, H.-C. (2008). Processing segmental and prosodic information in Cantonese word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1172–1190. doi:10.1037/a0013000
   Google Scholar
• Wong, A. W. K., & Chen, H. -C. (2009). What are effective phonological units in Cantonese spoken word planning? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 888–892. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.5.888
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q, Chen, H. -C., Weekes, B. S., & Yang, Y. (2009). Independent effects of orthographic and phonological facilitation on spoken word production in Mandarin. Language Speech, 52, 113–126. doi:10.1177/0023830908099885
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., & Weekes, B. S. (2009). Orthographic facilitation effects on spoken word production: Evidence from Chinese. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 1082–1096. doi:10.1080/01690960802042133
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., & Yang, Y. (2003). The determiners of picture naming latency. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 35, 447–454 (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, H., La Heij, W., & Schiller, N. O. (2012). Orthographic and phonological facilitation in speech production: New evidence from picture naming in Chinese. Acta Psychologica, 139, 272–280. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y. G. (1978). To what degree are the “phonetics” of present day Chinese characters still phonetic? Zhongguo Yuwen, 3, 172–177.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, X., Damian, M. F., & Zhang, Q. (2015). Seriality of semantic and phonological processes during overt speech in Mandarin as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Brain and Language, 144, 16–25. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.007
   Google Scholar