Applying an exemplar model to an implicit rule-learning task: Implicit learning of semantic structure

References

• Berry, D. C., & Broadbent, D. E. (1984). On the relationship between task performance and associated verbalizable knowledge. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 36, 209–231. doi: 10.1080/14640748408402156
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, L. R. (1978). Nonanalytic concept formation and memory for instances. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and Categorization (pp. 3–170). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Chubala, C. M., & Jamieson, R. K. (2013). Recoding and representation in artificial grammar learning. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 470–479. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0253-6
   Google Scholar
• Dienes, Z. (1992). Connectionist and memory-array models of artificial grammar learning. Cognitive Science, 16, 41–79. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1601_2
   Google Scholar
• Dienes, Z., Altmann, G. T. M., & Gao, S. (1999). Mapping across domains without feedback: A neural network model of transfer of implicit knowledge. Cognitive Science, 23, 53–82. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2301_3
   Google Scholar
• Günther, F., Dudschig, C., & Kaup, B. (2015). LSAfun - An R package for computations based on Latent Semantic Analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 930–944. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0529-0
   Google Scholar
• Higham, P. A., & Brooks, L. R. (1997). Learning the experimenter's design: Tacit sensitivity to the structure of memory lists. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 199–215. doi: 10.1080/027249897392297
   Google Scholar
• Hintzman, D. L. (1986). “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411–428. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.4.411
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, R. K., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2009). Applying an exemplar model to the serial reaction-time task: Anticipating from experience. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1757–1783. doi: 10.1080/17470210802557637
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, R. K., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2010). Applying an exemplar model to the artificial-grammar task: String completion and performance on individual items. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1014–1039. doi: 10.1080/17470210903267417
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, R. K., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2011). Grammaticality is inferred from global similarity: A reply to Kinder (2010). The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 209–216. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.537932
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. N., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2007). Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon. Psychological Review, 114, 1–37. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
   Google Scholar
• Neil, G. J., & Higham, P. A. (2012). Implicit learning of conjunctive rule sets: An alternative to artificial grammars. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 1393–1400. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.07.005
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A. (1973). You can't play 20 questions with nature and win: Projective comments on the papers of this symposium. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 283–308). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M. (1987). Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 87–108.
   Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M., & Johansen, M. K. (2000). Exemplar-based accounts of “multiple-system” phenomena in perceptual categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 375–402.
   Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M., & Zaki, S. R. (1998). Dissociations between categorization and recognition in amnesic and normal individuals: An exemplar-based interpretation. Psychological Science, 9, 247–255. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00051
   Google Scholar
• Pothos, E. M., & Bailey, T. M. (2000). The role of similarity in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 847–862.
   Google Scholar
• Recchia, G., Sahlgren, M., Kanerva, P., & Jones, M. N. (2015). Encoding sequential information in semantic space models: Comparing holographic reduced representation and random permutation. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2015, Article 986574, 1–18. doi: 10.1155/2015/986574
   Google Scholar
• Servan-Schreiber, E., & Anderson, J. R. (1990). Learning artificial grammars with competitive chunking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 592–608.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129–138. doi: 10.1037/h0042769
   Google Scholar
• Surprenant, A. M., & Neath, I. (2009). Principles of Memory. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vokey, J. R., & Brooks, L. R. (1992). Salience of item knowledge in learning artificial grammars. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 328–344.
   Google Scholar
• Vokey, J. R., & Higham, P. A. (2004). Opposition logic and neural network models in artificial grammar learning. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 565–578. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2004.05.008
   Google Scholar