Perceptual biases in the horizontal and vertical dimensions are driven by separate cognitive mechanisms

References

• Adair, J. C., Williamson, D. J., Jacobs, D. H., Na, D. L., & Heilman, K. M. (1995). Neglect of radial and vertical space: Importance of the retinotopic reference frame. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 58(6), 724–728. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.58.6.724
   Google Scholar
• Arrington, C. M., Carr, T. H., Mayer, A. R., & Rao, S. M. (2000). Neural mechanisms of visual attention: Object-based selection of a region in space. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(Suppl 2), 106–117. doi:10.1162/089892900563975
   Google Scholar
• Ben Hamed, S., Duhamel, J. R., Bremmer, F., & Graf, W. (2001). Representation of the visual field in the lateral intraparietal area of macaque monkeys: A quantitative receptive field analysis. Experimental Brain Research, 140(2), 127–144. doi: 10.1007/s002210100785
   Google Scholar
• Beschin, N., Cubelli, R., Della, S., & Spinazzola, L. (1997). Left of what? The role of egocentric coordinates in neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 63(4), 483–489. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.63.4.483
   Google Scholar
• Bjoertomt, O., Cowey, A., & Walsh, V. (2002). Spatial neglect in near and far space investigated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain, 125(9), 2012–2022. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf211
   Google Scholar
• Blatt, G. J., Andersen, R. A., & Stoner, G. R. (1990). Visual receptive field organization and cortico-cortical connections of the lateral intraparietal area (area LIP) in the macaque. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 299(4), 421–445. doi:10.1002/cne.902990404
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1980). Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia, 18(4–5), 491–498. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(80)90151-7
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, J. L., Nettleton, N. C., Nathan, G., & Wilson, L. (1985). Bisecting rods and lines: Effects of horizontal and vertical posture on left-side underestimation by normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 23(3), 421–425. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(85)90029-6
   Google Scholar
• Buxbaum, L. J., Ferraro, M. K., Veramonti, T., Farne, A., Whyte, J., Ladavas, E., … Coslett, H. B. (2004). Hemispatial neglect: Subtypes, neuroanatomy, and disability. Neurology, 62(5), 749–756. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000113730.73031.F4
   Google Scholar
• Chokron, S., & Imbert, M. (1993). Influence of reading habits on line bisection. Cognitive Brain Research, 1(4), 219–222. doi: 10.1016/0926-6410(93)90005-P
   Google Scholar
• Claunch, J. D., Falchook, A. D., Williamson, J. B., Fischler, I., Jones, E. M., Baum, J. B., & Heilman, K. M. (2012). Famous faces but not remembered spaces influence vertical line bisections. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 34(9), 919–924. doi:10.1080/13803395.2012.698600
   Google Scholar
• Dellatolas, G., Vanluchene, J., & Coutin, T. (1996). Visual and motor components in simple line bisection: An investigation in normal adults. Cognitive Brain Research, 4(1), 49–56. doi: 10.1016/0926-6410(96)00019-5
   Google Scholar
• Drain, M., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. (1996). Vertical orienting control: Evidence for attentional bias and “neglect” in the intact brain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125(2), 139–158. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.125.2.139
   Google Scholar
• Driver, J., & Halligan, P. W. (1991). Can visual neglect operate in object-centred co-ordinates? An affirmative single-case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8(6), 475–496. doi:10.1080/02643299108253384
   Google Scholar
• Duecker, F., & Sack, A. T. (2014). The hybrid model of attentional control: New insights into hemispheric asymmetries inferred from TMS research. Neuropsychologia, 74, 21–29. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.023
   Google Scholar
• Durgin, F. H., Doyle, E., & Egan, L. (2008). Upper-left gaze bias reveals competing search strategies in a reverse Stroop task. Acta Psychologica, 127(2), 428–448. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.08.007
   Google Scholar
• Fink, G. R., Dolan, R. J., Halligan, P. W., Marshall, J. C., & Frith, C. D. (1997). Space-based and object-based visual attention: Shared and specific neural domains. Brain, 120, 2013–2028. doi: 10.1093/brain/120.11.2013
   Google Scholar
• Fink, G. R., Marshall, J. C., Shah, N. J., Weiss, P. H., Halligan, P. W., Grosse-Ruyken, M., … Freund, H. J. (2000). Line bisection judgments implicate right parietal cortex and cerebellum as assessed by fMRI. Neurology, 54(6), 1324–1331. doi: 10.1212/WNL.54.6.1324
   Google Scholar
• Fink, G. R., Marshall, J. C., Weiss, P. H., Shah, N. J., Toni, I., Halligan, P. W., & Zilles, K. (2000). “Where” depends on “what”: A differential functional anatomy for position discrimination in one- versus two-dimensions. Neuropsychologia, 38(13), 1741–1748. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00078-6
   Google Scholar
• Fink, G. R., Marshall, J. C., Weiss, P. H., & Zilles, K. (2001). The neural basis of vertical and horizontal line bisection judgments: An fMRI study of normal volunteers. Neuroimage, 14(1 Pt 2), S59-S67. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0819
   Google Scholar
• Foulsham, T., Gray, A., Nasiopoulos, E., & Kingstone, A. (2013). Leftward biases in picture scanning and line bisection: A gaze-contingent window study. Vision Research, 78, 14–25. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2012.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, M. (1998). What's in a location? Comparing object-based and space-based models of feature integration in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127(2), 189–219. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.127.2.189
   Google Scholar
• Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15(1), 20–25. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1991). Figural modulation of visuo-spatial neglect: A case study. Neuropsychologia, 29(7), 619–628. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(91)90097-R
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1993). The bisection of horizontal and radial lines: A case study of normal controls and ten patients with left visuospatial neglect. International Journal of Neuroscience, 70(3–4), 149–167. doi: 10.3109/00207459309000571
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1994). Focal and global attention modulate the expression of visuo-spatial neglect: A case study. Neuropsychologia, 32(1), 13–21. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90065-5
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1995). Lateral and radial neglect as a function of spatial position: A case study. Neuropsychologia, 33(12), 1697–1702. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00041-0
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, M., Milner, A. D., & Roberts, R. C. (1995). An investigation of hemispatial neglect using the Landmark Task. Brain and Cognition, 27(1), 59–78. doi:10.1006/brcg.1995.1004
   Google Scholar
• Heber, I. A., Siebertz, S., Wolter, M., Kuhlen, T., & Fimm, B. (2010). Horizontal and vertical pseudoneglect in peri- and extrapersonal space. Brain and Cognition, 73(3), 160–166. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.04.006
   Google Scholar
• Heilman, K. M., & Valenstein, E. (1979). Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Annals of Neurology, 5(2), 166–170. doi:10.1002/ana.410050210
   Google Scholar
• Husain, M. (2008). Hemispatial neglect. In M. J. Aminoff, F. Boller, D. Swaab, G. Goldenberg, & B. T. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neurology Neuropsychology and behavioural Neurology (Vol. 88, pp. 359–372). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Husain, M., & Nachev, P. (2007). Space and the parietal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(1), 30–36. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.011
   Google Scholar
• Huttermann, S., Memmert, D., & Simons, D. J. (2014). The size and shape of the attentional “spotlight” varies with differences in sports expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20(2), 147–157. doi:10.1037/xap0000012
   Google Scholar
• James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jewell, G., & McCourt, M. E. (2000). Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38(1), 93–110. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00045-7
   Google Scholar
• Kageyama, S., Imagase, M., Okubo, M., & Takayama, Y. (1994). Neglect in three dimensions. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48(3), 206–210. doi: 10.5014/ajot.48.3.206
   Google Scholar
• Kashmere, J. L., & Kirk, A. (1997). The complex interaction of normal biases in line bisection. Neurology, 49(3), 887–889. doi: 10.1212/WNL.49.3.887
   Google Scholar
• Kerkhoff, G. (2001). Spatial hemineglect in humans. Progress in Neurobiology, 63(1), 1–27. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0082(00)00028-9
   Google Scholar
• Laeng, B., Buchtel, H. A., & Butter, C. M. (1996). Tactile rod bisection: Hemispheric activation and sex differences. Neuropsychologia, 34(11), 1115–1121. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(96)00025-5
   Google Scholar
• Le, A., Stojanoski, B. B., Khan, S., Keough, M., & Niemeier, M. (2015). A toggle switch of visual awareness? Cortex, 64, 169–178. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.09.015
   Google Scholar
• Luh, K. E. (1995). Line bisection and perceptual asymmetries in normal individuals: What you see is not what you get. Neuropsychology, 9(4), 435–448. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.9.4.435
   Google Scholar
• McCourt, M. E. (2001). Performance consistency of normal observers in forced-choice tachistoscopic visual line bisection. Neuropsychologia, 39(10), 1065–1076. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00044-6
   Google Scholar
• McCourt, M. E., & Garlinghouse, M. (2000). Asymmetries of visuospatial attention are modulated by viewing distance and visual field elevation: Pseudoneglect in peripersonal and extrapersonal space. Cortex, 36(5), 715–731. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70548-3
   Google Scholar
• McCourt, M. E., & Jewell, G. (1999). Visuospatial attention in line bisection: Stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia, 37(7), 843–855. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00140-7
   Google Scholar
• McCourt, M. E., & Olafson, C. (1997). Cognitive and perceptual influences on visual line bisection: Psychophysical and chronometric analyses of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia, 35(3), 369–380. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(96)00143-1
   Google Scholar
• McManus, I. C. (2002). Left hand, right hand. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Mesulam, M.-M. (1981). A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Annals of Neurology, 10, 309–325. doi: 10.1002/ana.410100402
   Google Scholar
• Milner, A. D., Brechmann, M., & Pagliarini, L. (1992). To halve and to halve not: An analysis of line bisection judgements in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 30(6), 515–526. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(92)90055-Q
   Google Scholar
• Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, M. E., Hughes, G., Mattingley, J. B., & Bradshaw, J. L. (2004). Are object- and space-based attentional biases both important to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries? Experimental Brain Research, 154(4), 513–520. doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1688-x
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, M. E., Mattingley, J. B., Berberovic, N., Smith, A., & Bradshaw, J. L. (2004). An investigation of the relationship between free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for vertical and horizontal stimuli. Cognitive Brain Research, 19(3), 289–301. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.12.008
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, M. E., Thomas, N. A., Loetscher, T., & Grimshaw, G. M. (2013). The Flinders Handedness survey (FLANDERS): A brief measure of skilled hand preference. Cortex, 49(10), 2914–2926. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2013.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Parton, A., Malhotra, P., & Husain, M. (2004). Hemispatial neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 75(1), 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Pitzalis, S., Di Russo, F., Spinelli, D., & Zoccolotti, P. (2001). Influence of the radial and vertical dimensions on lateral neglect. Experimental Brain Research, 136(3), 281–294. doi: 10.1007/s002210000580
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25. doi: 10.1080/00335558008248231
   Google Scholar
• Previc, F. H. (1990). Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13(03), 519–542. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00080018
   Google Scholar
• Rinaldi, L., Di Luca, S., Henik, A., & Girelli, L. (2014). Reading direction shifts visuospatial attention: An Interactive Account of attentional biases. Acta Psychologica, 151, 98–105. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.018
   Google Scholar
• Rueckert, L., Deravanesian, A., Baboorian, D., Lacalamita, A., & Repplinger, M. (2002). Pseudoneglect and the cross-over effect. Neuropsychologia, 40(2), 162–173. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00082-3
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, A. F., & Brück, R. (1991). The effect of presentation time on the size of the visual lobe. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29(3), 206–208. doi:10.3758/BF03342679
   Google Scholar
• Schenkenberg, T., Bradford, D. C., & Ajax, E. T. (1980). Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment. Neurology, 30(5), 509–517. doi: 10.1212/WNL.30.5.509
   Google Scholar
• Tegner, R., & Levander, M. (1991). The influence of stimulus properties on visual neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 54(10), 882–887. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.54.10.882
   Google Scholar
• Tipper, S. P., & Behrmann, M. (1996). Object-centered not scene-based visual neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(5), 1261–1278.
   Google Scholar
• Vallar, G., & Perani, D. (1986). The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man. Neuropsychologia, 24(5), 609–622. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(86)90001-1
   Google Scholar
• van Vugt, P., Fransen, I., Creten, W., & Paquier, P. (2000). Line bisection performances of 650 normal children. Neuropsychologia, 38(6), 886–895. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00130-X
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, P. H., Marshall, J. C., Wunderlich, G., Tellmann, L., Halligan, P. W., Freund, H. J., … Fink, G. R. (2000). Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: A physiological basis for clinical dissociations. Brain, 123, 2531–2541. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.12.2531
   Google Scholar