210
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular articles

Knowledge central: A central role for knowledge attributions in social evaluations

, &
Pages 504-515 | Received 07 Jul 2015, Accepted 21 Dec 2015, Published online: 11 Mar 2016

References

  • Birch, S. A., & Bloom, P. (2003). Children are cursed: An asymmetric bias in mental-state attribution. Psychological Science, 14(3), 283–286. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.03436.
  • Brennan, S. E., & Williams, M. (1995). The feeling of another's knowing: Prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(3), 383–398. doi:10.1006/jmla.1995.1017.
  • Buckwalter, W. (2014). Factive verbs and protagonist projection. Episteme, 11(4), 391–409. doi:10.1017/epi.2014.22.
  • Buckwalter, W., Rose, D., & Turri, J. (2013). Belief through thick and thin. Nous, 1–28. doi:10.1111/nous.12048.
  • Chisholm, R. (1989). Theory of knowledge (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Cimpian, A., & Scott, R. M. (2012). Children expect generic knowledge to be widely shared. Cognition, 123(3), 419–433. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.02.003.
  • Cohen, J. (1981). Subjective probability and the paradox of the gatecrasher. Arizona State Law Journal, 52, 627–656.
  • Dawes, R., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243(4899), 1668–1674. doi:10.1126/science.2648573.
  • Dawes, R. M. (1996). House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. New York: Free Press.
  • Friedman, O., & Turri, J. (2015). Is probabilistic evidence a source of knowledge? Cognitive Science, 39, 1062–1080. doi:10.1111/cogs.12182.
  • Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1991). Accuracy and bias in estimates of others’ knowledge. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21(5), 445–454. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420210507.
  • Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1992). Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers’ assumptions about what others know. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 62(3), 378–391. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.3.378.
  • Goldman, A. I. (1967). A causal theory of knowing. Journal of Philosophy, 64(12), 357–372. doi:10.2307/2024268.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Ichikawa, J. J., & Steup, M. (2012). The analysis of knowledge. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (E.N. Zalta, Eds.). Retrieved August 1, 2015, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-analysis/index.html
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). Variants of uncertainty. Cognition, 11(2), 143–157. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(82)90023-3.
  • Lagnado, D., & Sloman, S. A. (2004). Inside and outside probability judgments. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment & decision making (pp. 157–176). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Lau, I. Y. M., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (2001). I know what you know: Assumptions about others’ knowledge and their effects on message construction. Social Cognition, 19(6), 587–600. doi:10.1521/soco.19.6.587.20888.
  • Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical vs. statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Moore, C., Pure, K., & Furrow, D. (1990). Children's understanding of the modal expression of speaker certainty and uncertainty and its relation to the development of a representational theory of mind. Child Development, 61(3), 722–730. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02815.x.
  • Nickerson, R. S., Baddeley, A., & Freeman, B. (1987). Are people's estimates of what other people know influenced by what they themselves know? Acta Psychologica, 64(3), 245–259. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(87)90010-2.
  • Niedermeier, K. E., Kerr, N. L., & Messé, L. A. (1999). Jurors’ use of naked statistical evidence: Exploring bases and implications of the Wells effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 533–542. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.533.
  • Pratt, C., & Bryant, P. (1990). Young children understand that looking leads to knowing (so long as they are looking into a single barrel). Child Development, 61(4), 973–982. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02835.x.
  • Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 93–115. doi:10.1037/a0022658.
  • Schroeder, D. A., & Linder, D. E. (1976). Effects of actor's causal role, outcome severity, and knowledge of prior accidents upon attributions of responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12(4), 340–356. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(76)80003-0.
  • Shatz, M., Wellman, H. M., & Silber, S. (1983). The acquisition of mental verbs: A systematic investigation of the first reference to mental state. Cognition, 14(3), 301–321. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90008-2.
  • Sloman, S. A., & Lagnado, D. (2014). Causality in thought. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 140725140102007. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015135.
  • Sobel, D. M. (2009). Enabling conditions and children's understanding of pretense. Cognition, 113(2), 177–188. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.002.
  • Sodian, B. (1988). Children's attributions of knowledge to the listener in a referential communication task. Child Development, 59(2), 378–385. doi:10.2307/1130317.
  • Sodian, B., & Wimmer, H. (1987). Children's understanding of inference as a source of knowledge. Child Development, 58(2), 424–433. doi:10.2307/1130519.
  • Starmans, C., & Friedman, O. (2012). The folk conception of knowledge. Cognition, 124(3), 272–283. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.017.
  • Thomas, R. C., & Jacoby, L. L. (2013). Diminishing adult egocentrism when estimating what others know. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(2), 473–486. doi:10.1037/a0028883.
  • Turri, J. (2012). In Gettier's wake. In S. Hetherington (Eds.), Epistemology: The key thinkers (pp. 214–229). London: Continuum.
  • Turri, J. (2014). Skeptical appeal: The source-content bias. Cognitive Science. doi:10.1111/cogs.12153.
  • Turri, J. (2015). From virtue epistemology to abilism: Theoretical and empirical developments. In C. B. Miller, M. R. Furr, A. Knobel, & W. Fleeson (Eds.), Character: New directions from philosophy, psychology, and theology (pp. 315–330). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Turri, J., & Friedman, O. (2014). Winners and losers in the folk epistemology of lotteries. In J. R. Beebe (Eds.), Advances in experimental epistemology (pp. 45–69). London: Bloomsbury.
  • Turri, J., Buckwalter, W., & Blouw, P. (2014). Knowledge and luck. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0683-5.
  • Wells, G. L. (1992). Naked statistical evidence of liability: Is subjective probability enough? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(5), 739. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.5.739.
  • Wesson, C. J., & Pulford, B. D. (2009). Verbal expressions of confidence and doubt. Psychological Reports, 105(1), 151–160. doi:10.2466/PR0.105.1.151-160.
  • Wimmer, H., Hogrefe, G. J., & Perner, J. (1988). Children's understanding of informational access as source of knowledge. Child Development, 59(2), 386–396. doi:10.2307/1130318.
  • Woolley, J. D., & Wellman, H. M. (1993). Origin and truth: Young children's understanding of imaginary mental representations. Child Development, 64(1), 1–17. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02892.x.
  • Wright, E. F., Maceachern, L., Stoffer, E., & Macdonald, N. (1996). Factors affecting the use of naked statistical evidence of liability. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136(6), 677–688. doi:10.1080/00224545.1996.9712244.
  • Young, L., & Saxe, R. (2011). When ignorance is no excuse: Different roles for intent across moral domains. Cognition, 120(2), 202–214. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.04.005.
  • Yuill, N., & Perner, J. (1988). Intentionality and knowledge in children's judgments of actor‘s responsibility and recipient's emotional reaction. Developmental Psychology, 24(3), 358––365. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.24.3.358.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.