The “parts and wholes” of face recognition: A review of the literature

References

• Ahissar, M., & Hochetein, S. (1998). Perceptual learning. In V. Walsh & J. Kulikowski (Eds.), Perceptual constancies: Why things look as they (pp. 455–498). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bahrick, H. P., Bahrick, P. O., & Wittlinger, R. P. (1975). Fifty years of memory for names and faces: A cross-sectional approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(1), 54–75. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.104.1.54
   Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M., & Ewell, C. (2003). Expertise in tactile pattern recognition. Psychological Science, 14, 480–492. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.02458
   Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M., Thomas, C., & Humphreys, K. (2006). Seeing it differently: Visual processing in autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(6), 258–264. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Blair, R. J. R., Frith, U., Smith, N., Abell, F., & Cipolotti, L. (2002). Fractionation of visual memory: Agency detection and its impairment in autism. Neuropsychologia, 40, 108–118. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00069-0
   Google Scholar
• Boucher, J., & Lewis, V. (1992). Unfamiliar face recognition in relatively able autistic children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 843–859. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1992.tb01960.x
   Google Scholar
• Boutsen, L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). Face context interferes with local part processing in a prosopagnosic patient. Neuropsychologia, 40(13), 2305–2313. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12417460 doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00088-X
   Google Scholar
• Bruyer, R. (2011). Configural face processing: A meta-analytic survey. Perception, 40(12), 1478–1490. doi: 10.1068/p6928
   Google Scholar
• Burton, A. M., Schweinberger, S. R., Jenkins, R., & Kaufmann, J. M. (2015). Arguments against a configural processing account of familiar face recognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(4), 482–496. doi: 10.1177/1745691615583129
   Google Scholar
• Busigny, T., Joubert, S., Felician, O., Ceccaldi, M., & Rossion, B. (2010). Holistic perception of the individual face is specific and necessary: Evidence from an extensive case study of acquired prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 48(14), 4057–4092. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.017
   Google Scholar
• Cabeza, R., & Kato, T. (2000). Features are also important: Contributions of featural and configural processing to face recognition. Psychological Science, 11, 429–433. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00283
   Google Scholar
• Carey, S., & Diamond, R. (1977). From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. Science, 195, 312–314. doi: 10.1126/science.831281
   Google Scholar
• Chiroro, P., & Valentine, T. (1995). An investigation of the contact hypothesis of the own-race bias in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 48A, 879–894. doi: 10.1080/14640749508401421
   Google Scholar
• Davidoff, J., & Donnelly, N. (1990). Object superiority: A comparison of complete and part probes. Acta Psychologica, 73(3), 225–243. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(90)90024-A
   Google Scholar
• de Gelder, B., & Rouw, R. (2000a). Configural face processes in acquired and developmental prosopagnosia: Evidence for two separate face systems? Neuroreport, 11, 3145–3150. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200009280-00021
   Google Scholar
• de Gelder, B. & Rouw, R. (2000b). Paradoxical configuration effects for faces and objects in prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1271–1279. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00039-7
   Google Scholar
• De Heering, A., De Liedekerke, C., Deboni, M., & Rossion, B. (2010). The role of experience during childhood in shaping the other-race effect. Developmental Science, 13(1), 181–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00876.x
   Google Scholar
• DeGutis, J., Cohan, S., & Mercado, R. (2012). Holistic processing of the mouth but not the eyes in developmental prosopagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 29, 419–446. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2012.754745
   Google Scholar
• DeGutis, J., DeNicola, C., Zink, T., McGlinchey, R., & Milberg, W. (2011). Training with own-race faces can improve processing of other-race faces: Evidence from developmental prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2505–2513. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.04.031
   Google Scholar
• DeGutis, J., Wilmer, J., Mercado, R. J., & Cohan, S. (2013). Using regression to measure holistic face processing reveals a strong link with face recognition ability. Cognition, 126(1), 87–100. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Faja, S., Webb, S. J., Merkle, K., Aylward, E., & Dawson, G. (2009). Brief report: Face configuration accuracy and processing speed among adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 14(34), 4007–09.
   Google Scholar
• Farah, M. J. (1992). Is an object an object an object? Cognitive and neuropsychological investigations of domain-specificity in visual object recognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 164–169. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep11510333
   Google Scholar
• Freire, A., Lee, K., & Symons, L. A. (2000). The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence. Perception, 29(2), 159–170. doi: 10.1068/p3012
   Google Scholar
• Freiwald, W. A., Tsao, D. Y., & Livingstone, M. S. (2009). A face feature space in the macaque temporal lobe. Nature Neuroscience, 12(9), 1187–1196. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2363 doi: 10.1038/nn.2363
   Google Scholar
• Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into the human faculty & its development. JM Dent and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier, I., Klaiman, C., & Schultz, R. T. (2009). Face composite effects reveal abnormal face processing in Autism spectrum disorders. Vision Research, 49(4), 470–478. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.12.007
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., & Aguirre, G. K. (2008). The representation of parts and wholes in face-selective cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(5), 863–878. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20509
   Google Scholar
• Heptonstall, B., Tanaka, J. W., & Hoven, M. (2013). The fate of holistic face representations in long-term memory. Journal of Vision, 13(9), 102–102. doi: 10.1167/13.9.102
   Google Scholar
• Hochstein, S., & Ahissar, M. (2002). View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron, 36(5), 791–804. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01091-7
   Google Scholar
• Iarocci, G., Burack, J. A., Shore, D. I., Mottron, L., & Enns, J. T. (2006). Global-local visual processing in high functioning children with autism: Structural vs. implicit task biases. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1), 117–129. doi: 10.1007/s10803-005-0045-2
   Google Scholar
• Jemel, B., Mottron, L., & Dawson, M. (2006). Impaired face processing in autism: Fact or artifact? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1), 91–106. doi: 10.1007/s10803-005-0050-5
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, R. M., & Tanaka, J. (2003). Holistic and part-based face recognition in children with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 529–542. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00142
   Google Scholar
• Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302–4311.
   Google Scholar
• Klin, A., Sparrow, S. S., de Bildt, A., Cicchetti, D. V., Cohen, D. J., & Volkmar, F. R. (1999). A normed study of face recognition in autism and related disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 499–508. doi: 10.1023/A:1022299920240
   Google Scholar
• Konar, Y., Bennett, P. J., & Sekuler, A. B. (2010). Holistic processing is not correlated with face-identification accuracy. Psychological Science, 21(1), 38–43. doi: 10.1177/0956797609356508
   Google Scholar
• Le Grand, R., Mondloch, C. J., Maurer, D., & Brent, H. P. (2004). Impairment in holistic face processing following early visual deprivation. Psychological Science, 15, 762–768. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00753.x
   Google Scholar
• Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (1998). Local and relational aspects of face distinctiveness. Quartlerly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51(3), 449–473.
   Google Scholar
• Leder, H., & Carbon, C.-C. (2005). When context hinders! Learn-test compatibility in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 58, 235–250. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000936
   Google Scholar
• Le Grand, R., Mondloch, C. J., Maurer, D., & Brent, H. P. (2001). Neuroperception: Early visual experience and face processing. Nature, 410, 890–890. doi: 10.1038/35073749
   Google Scholar
• Levin, D. T. (2000). Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and cross-race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 559–574. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.129.4.559
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, B., Donnelly, N., Hadwin, J. A., & Leekam, S. R. (2004). Face processing in high-functioning adolescents with autism: Evidence for weak central coherence. Visual Cognition, 11, 673–688. doi: 10.1080/13506280344000437
   Google Scholar
• Macho, S. & Leder, H. (1998). Your eyes only? A test of interactive influence in the processing of facial features. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1486–1500. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.5.1486
   Google Scholar
• Mccarthy, G., Puce, A., Belger, A. & Allison, T. (1999). Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 9(5), 431–444. doi: 10.1093/cercor/9.5.431
   Google Scholar
• Mckone, E. (2004). Isolating the special component of face recognition: Peripheral identification and a mooney face. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(1), 181–197.
   Google Scholar
• McKone, E., & Yovel, G. (2009). Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 16(5), 778–797. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.778
   Google Scholar
• Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 7, 3–35. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Michel, C., Rossion, B., Han, J., Chung, C. S., & Caldara, R. (2006). Holistic processing is finely tuned for faces of one's own race. Psychological Science, 17(7), 608–615. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01752.x
   Google Scholar
• Mondloch, C. J., Le Grand, R., & Maurer, D. (2002). Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing. Perception, 31(5), 553–566. doi: 10.1068/p3339
   Google Scholar
• Ng, W., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1994). Cross-race facial recognition: Failure of the contact hypothesis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 217–232. doi: 10.1177/0022022194252004
   Google Scholar
• Pellicano, E., & Rhodes, G. (2003). Holistic processing of faces in preschool children and adults. Psychological Science, 14(6), 618–622. doi: 10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1474.x
   Google Scholar
• Perrett, D. I., Rolls, E. T., & Caan, W. (1982). Visual neurons responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 47, 329–342. doi: 10.1007/BF00239352
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, P. C., Lee, K., Pascalis, O., Tanaka, J. W. ( in press). Evidence for a perceptual-to-social transition in infant categorization of other-race faces. Developmental Science.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, C. L., Stone, V. E., Bozova, S., & Tanaka, J. (2003). The body-inversion effect. Psychological Science, 14(4), 302–308. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.14431
   Google Scholar
• Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(2), 275–280. doi: 10.1037/h0027768
   Google Scholar
• Richler, J. J., Cheung, O. S., & Gauthier, I. (2011). Holistic processing predicts face recognition. Psychological Science, 22(4), 464–471. doi: 10.1177/0956797611401753
   Google Scholar
• Richler, J. J., & Gauthier, I. (2013). When intuition fails to align with data: A reply to. Visual Cognition, 21, 37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Riesenhuber, M., Jarudi, I., Gilad, S., & Sinha, P. (2004). Face processing in humans is compatible with a simple shape-based model of vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271(Suppl_6), S448–S450. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0216
   Google Scholar
• Rossion, B. (2008). Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. Acta Psychologica, 128(2), 274–289. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Rossion, B. (2013). The composite face illusion: A whole window into our understanding of holistic face perception. Visual Cognition, 21(2), 139–253. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2013.772929
   Google Scholar
• Rossion, B., Dricot, L., Goebel, R., & Busigny, T. (2011). Holistic face categorization in higher order visual areas of the normal and prosopagnosic brain: Toward a non-hierarchical view of face perception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4 (January), 225. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00225
   Google Scholar
• Rossion, B., Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Despland, P., Bruyer, R., Linotte, S., & Crommelinck, M. (2000). The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: An electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain. Neuroreport, 11(1), 69–72. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200001170-00014
   Google Scholar
• Schiltz, C., & Rossion, B. (2006). Faces are represented holistically in the human occipito-temporal cortex. NeuroImage, 32, 1385–1394. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.037
   Google Scholar
• Schyns, P. G., Bonnar, L., & Gosselin, F. (2002). Show me the features! Understanding recognition from the use of visual information. Psychological science, 13(5), 402–409. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00472
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. & Gordon, I. (2011). Featural, configural and holistic perception of faces. In A. Calder, J. Haxby & G. Rhodes (Eds.), Handbook of face perception (pp. 177–194). New York: University Oxford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A(2), 225–245. doi: 10.1080/14640749308401045
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., & Gauthier, I. (1997). Expertise in object and face recognition. In R. L. Goldstone, P. G. Schyns, & D. L. Medin (Eds.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 36, pp. 83–125). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., Kaiser, M. D., Hagen, S., & Pierce, L. J. (2014). Losing face: Impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 76(4), 1000–1014. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0628-0
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., Kay, J. B., Grinnell, E., Stansfield, B., & Szechter, L. (1998). Face recognition in young children: When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Visual Cognition, 5(4), 479–496. doi: 10.1080/713756795
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., Kiefer, M., & Bukach, C. M. (2004). A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: Evidence from a cross- cultural study. Cognition, 93, B1–B9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.011
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., & Sengco, J. A. (1997). Features and their configuration in face recognition. Memory and Cognition, 25, 583–592. doi: 10.3758/BF03211301
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., & Sung, A. (2013). The “eye avoidance” hypothesis of autism face processing. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 00, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., Wolf, J. M., Klaiman, C., Koenig, K., Herlihy, L., Brown, C., … Schultz, R. T. (2010). Using computerized games to teach face recognition skills to children with autism spectrum disorder: The let's face it! program. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 8, 944–952. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02258.x
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, K. (1996). Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 19, 109–139. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.19.1.109
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, K., Saito, H., Fukada, Y., & Moriya, M. (1991). Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 66(1), 170–189.
   Google Scholar
• Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80(5), 352–373. doi: 10.1037/h0020071
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, S., Coleman, M. & Bailey, A. (2008). An investigation of basic facial expression recognition in autism spectrum disorders. Cognition and Emotion, 22(7), 1353–1380. doi:10.1080/02699930701782153
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R., Li, J., Fang, H., Tian, M., & Liu, J. (2012). Individual differences in holistic processing predict face recognition ability. Psychological Science, 23(2), 169–177. doi: 10.1177/0956797611420575
   Google Scholar
• Weigelt, S., Koldewyn, K., & Kanwisher, N. (2012). Face identity recognition in autism spectrum disorders: A review of behavioral studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(3), 1060–1084. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.12.008
   Google Scholar
• Willenbockel, V., Fiset, D., Chauvin, A., Blais, C., Arguin, M., Tanaka, J. W., … Gosselin, F. (2010). Does face inversion change spatial frequency tuning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 36(1), 122–135.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, J. M., Tanaka, J. W., Klaiman, C., Cockburn, J., Herlihy, L., Brown, C., … Schultz, R. T. (2008). Specific impairment of face-processing abilities in children with autism spectrum disorder using the let's face it! skills battery. Autism Research, 1, 329–340. doi: 10.1002/aur.56
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 81, 141–145. doi: 10.1037/h0027474
   Google Scholar
• Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16(6), 747–759. doi:10.1068/p160747
   Google Scholar
• Yovel, G., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). Face perception: Domain specific, not process specific. Neuron, 44(5), 889–898.
   Google Scholar