Concessive and semifactual interpretations during reasoning with multiple conditionals

References

• Barrouillet, P., & Lecas, J. F. (1999). Mental models in conditional reasoning and working memory. Thinking & Reasoning, 5(4), 289–302. doi: 10.1080/135467899393940
   Google Scholar
• Begeer, S., & Stockmann, L. (2009). Brief report: Inhibitory control of socially relevant stimuli in children with high functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 1603–1607. doi: 10.1007/s10803-009-0786-4
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, R. M. J. (2005). The rational imagination: How people create alternatives to reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, R. M. J. (2016). Counterfactual thought. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 135–157. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033249
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T. (1993). The mental model theory of conditional reasoning: Critical appraisal and revision. Cognition, 48(1), 1–20. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90056-2
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T. (2006). The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 378–395. doi: 10.3758/BF03193858
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T., Over, D. E., & Handley, S. J. (2005). Suppositions, extensionality, and conditionals: A critique of the mental model theory of Johnson-Laird and Byrne (2002). Psychological Review, 112(4), 1040–1052. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.1040
   Google Scholar
• Feeney, A., & Handley, S. J. (2011). Suppositions, conditionals, and causal claims. In Understanding counterfactuals and causation: Issues in philosophy and psychology (pp. 242–262). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Girotto, V., Mazzocco, A., & Tasso, A. (1999). The effect of premise order in conditional reasoning: A test of the mental model theory. Cognition, 63(1), 1–28. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00792-5
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Veiga, I., García-Madruga, J. A., & Moreno-Ríos, S. (2010). The interpretation of indicative and subjunctive concessives. Acta Psychologica, 134(2), 245–252. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.005
   Google Scholar
• Handley, S., & Feeney, A. (2004). Reasoning and pragmatics: The case of even-if. In I. A. Noveck & D. Sperberg (Eds.), Experimental pragmatics (pp. 228–253). Besingstone: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Handley, S., & Feeney, A. (2007). Representation, pragmatics and process in model based reasoning. In W. Shaeken, A. Vandierendonck, W. Schroyens, & G. d’Ydewalle (Eds.), The mental models theory of reasoning. Refinements and extension (pp. 25–52). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2010). Against logical form. Psychologica Belgica, 50(34), 193–221. doi: 10.5334/pb-50-3-4-193
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1991). Deduction. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2002). Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference. Psychological Review, 109(4), 646–678. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.646
   Google Scholar
• Khemlani, S., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2012). Hidden conflicts: Explanations make inconsistencies harder to detect. Acta Psychologica, 139(3), 486–491. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.01.010
   Google Scholar
• Khemlani, S., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2013). Cognitive changes from explanations. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(2), 139–146. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2012.720968
   Google Scholar
• König, E. (1986). Conditionals, concessive–conditionals, and concessives: Areas of contrast, overlap and neutralisation. In E. Traugott (Ed.), On conditionals (pp. 229–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCloy, R., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2002). Semifactual ‘even if’ thinking. Thinking & Reasoning, 8(1), 41–67. doi: 10.1080/13546780143000125
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-Ríos, S., & García-Madruga, J. A. (2002). El desarrollo del razonamiento sobre lo que podría haber ocurrido: condicionales indicativos y subjuntivos. Infancia y aprendizaje, 25(4), 485–498. doi: 10.1174/021037002762064055
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-Ríos, S., García-Madruga, J. A., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2008). Inferences from semifactual ‘even if’ conditionals. Acta Psychologica, 128(2), 197–209. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.12.008
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-Ríos, S., Rojas-Barahona, C. A., & García-Madruga, J. (2014). Perceptual inferences about indeterminate arrangements of figures. Acta Psychologica, 148, 216–225. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.004
   Google Scholar
• Quelhas, A. C., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2003). Reasoning with deontic and counterfactual conditionals. Thinking and Reasoning, 9, 43–65. doi: 10.1080/13546780244000105
   Google Scholar
• Rafetseder, E., Schwitalla, M., & Perner, J. (2013). Counterfactual reasoning: From childhood to adulthood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114(3), 389–404. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.010
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Ballesteros, J. A., & Moreno-Ríos, S. (in press). Inherent directionality of ‘even if’ counterfactual conditionals. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. doi:10.1080/20445911.2016.1142996
   Google Scholar
• Santamaría, C., Espino, O., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2005). Counterfactual and semifactual conditionals prime alternative possibilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(5), 1149–1154.
   Google Scholar
• Schaeken, W. S., Van der Henst, J. B., & Schroyens, W. (2007). The mental models theory of relational reasoning: Premises’ relevance, conclusions’ phrasing, and cognitive economy. In W. Schaeken, A. Vandierendonck, W. Schroyens, & G. d'Ydewalle (Eds.), The mental models theory of reasoning: Refinements and extensions (pp. 129–149). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, A. J., Haigh, M., & Kidd, E. (2009). An investigation into the online processing of counterfactual and indicative conditionals. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(11), 2113–2125. doi: 10.1080/17470210902973106
   Google Scholar