Testing enhances both encoding and retrieval for both tested and untested items

References

• Anderson, M. C. (2003). Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 415–445. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.006
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. C., Green, C., & McCulloch, K. C. (2000). Similarity and inhibition in long-term memory: Evidence for a two-factor theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1141–1159. doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1141
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, K. M., & McDermott, K. B. (2013a). Free recall enhances subsequent learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 507–513. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0370-3
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, K. M., & McDermott, K. B. (2013b). Test-potentiated learning: Distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 940–945. doi:10.1037/a0029199
   Google Scholar
• Bäuml, K.-H. T., & Kleigl, O. (2013). The critical role of retrieval processes in release from proactive interference. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 39–53. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.07.006
   Google Scholar
• Bäuml, K-H. T., & Samenieh, A. (2010). The two faces of memory retrieval. Psychological Science, 21, 793–795. doi:10.1177/0956797610370162
   Google Scholar
• Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Correcting a metacognitive error: Feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 918–928. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.918
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. K. (2012). Testing enhances the transfer of learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 279–283. doi:10.1177/0963721412452728
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. K., & DeLosh, E. L. (2006). Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect. Memory & Cognition, 34, 268–276. doi:10.3758/BF031934054
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. K., Pashler, H., Wixted, J. T., & Vul, E. (2008). The effects of tests on learning and forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 36, 438–448. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.2.438
   Google Scholar
• Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20, 633–642. doi: 10.3758/BF03202713
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J. C. (2009). When does retrieval induce forgetting and when does it induce facilitation? Implications for retrieval inhibition, testing effect, and text processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 153–170. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.004
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J. C., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger III, H. L. (2006). Retrieval-induced facilitation: Initially nontested material can benefit from prior testing of related material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 553–571. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.553
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coppens, L. C., Verkoeijen, P. P., & Rikers, R. M. (2011). Learning Adinkra symbols: The effect of testing. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 351–357. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2011.507188
   Google Scholar
• Dobler, I. M., & Bäuml, K. H. T. (2012). Dissociating the two faces of selective memory retrieval. Memory, 20, 478–486. doi:10.1080/09658211.2012.680963
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., & Burke, M. J. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 170–177. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.170
   Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 4–58. doi:10.1177/1529100612453266
   Google Scholar
• Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Adams, R. B. Jr., Allen, J., … Nosek, B. A. (2015). Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Retrieved from Open Science Framework website https://osf.io/s59bg/?action=download&version=1
   Google Scholar
• Erlebacher, A. (1977). Design and analysis of experiments contrasting the within- and between-subjects manipulation of the independent variable. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 212–219. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.84.2.212
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
   Google Scholar
• Finley, J. R., & Benjamin, A. S. (2012). Adaptive and qualitative changes in encoding strategy with experience: Evidence from the test-expectancy paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 632–652. doi:10.1037/a0026215
   Google Scholar
• Frick, R. W. (1995). Accepting the null hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 23(1), 132–138. doi:10.3758/BF03210562
   Google Scholar
• Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2002). A distributed representation of temporal context. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46, 269–299. doi:10.1006/jmps.2001.1388
   Google Scholar
• Izawa, C. (1970). Optimal potentiating effects and forgetting-prevention effects of tests in paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 340–344. doi: 10.1037/h0028541
   Google Scholar
• Izawa, C. (1971). The test trial potentiating model. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 8, 200–224. doi:10.1016/0022-2496(71)90012-5
   Google Scholar
• Jang, Y., Wixted, J. T., Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Huber, D. E. (2012). Decomposing the interaction between retention interval and study/test practice: The role of retrievability. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 962–975. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.638079
   Google Scholar
• Kang, S. H. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). Test format and corrective feedback modify the effect of testing on long-term retention. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 528–558. doi:10.1080/09541440601056620
   Google Scholar
• Karpicke, J. D. (2009). Metacognitive control and strategy selection: Deciding to practice retrieval during learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 469–486. doi:10.1037/a0017341
   Google Scholar
• Karpicke, J. D. (2012). Retrieval-based learning: Active retrieval promotes meaningful learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 157–163. doi:10.1177/0963721412443552
   Google Scholar
• Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? Memory, 17, 471–479. doi:10.1080/09658210802647009
   Google Scholar
• Karpicke, J. D., Lehman, M., & Aue, W. R. (2014). Retrieval-based learning: An episodic context account. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 61, 237–284. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800283-4.00007-1
   Google Scholar
• Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 151–162. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Kornell, N., Rabelo, V. C., & Klein, P. J. (2012). Tests enhance learning—Compared to what? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 257–259. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Lehman, M., & Karpicke, J. D. (2016). Elaborative retrieval: Do semantic mediators improve memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/xlm0000267
   Google Scholar
• Lehman, M., Smith, M. A., & Karpicke, J. D. (2014). Toward an episodic context account of retrieval-based learning: Dissociating retrieval practice and elaboration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1787–1794. doi:10.1037/xlm0000012
   Google Scholar
• Loftus, G. R., & Wickens, T. D. (1970). Effect of incentive on storage and retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 85, 141–147. doi:10.1037/h0029537
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, K. B., Agarwal, P. K., D’Antonio, L., Roediger, H. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2014). Both multiple-choice and short-answer quizzes enhance later exam performance in middle and high school classes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20, 3–21. doi:10.1037/xap0000004
   Google Scholar
• Neely, J. H., & Cho, K. W. (2014). Testing and retrieval practice effects: Assessing the contributions of encoding and retrieval mechanisms. In D. S. Lindsay, C. M. Kelley, A. P. Yonelinas, & H. L. Roediger III (Eds.), Remembering: Attributions, processes, and control in human memory: Papers in honour of Larry L. Jacoby (pp. 29–45). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1994). Norms of paired-associate recall during multitrial learning of Swahili-English translation equivalents. Memory, 2, 325–335. doi:10.1080/09658219408258951
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, M. E., Loveless, K. M., Thomas, N. A., Loetscher, T., & Churches, O. (2015). Some participants may be better than others: Sustained attention and motivation are higher early in semester. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 10–18. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.925481
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, L. D., & Weinstein, Y. (2012). Testing improves true recall and protects against the buildup of proactive interference without increasing false recall. Memory, 20, 138–154. doi:10.1080/09658211.2011.648198
   Google Scholar
• Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2005). When does feedback facilitate learning of words? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 3–8. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Pastötter, B., & Bäuml, K-H. T. (2014). Retrieval practice enhances new learning: the forward effect of testing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00286
   Google Scholar
• Pastötter, B., Schicker, S., Niedernhuber, J., & Bäuml, K-H. T. (2011). Retrieval during learning facilitates subsequent memory encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 287–297. doi:10.1037/a0021801
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, A. L., & Roediger, H. L. (2013). Does response mode affect amount recalled or the magnitude of the testing effect? Memory & Cognition, 41, 36–48. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0245-x
   Google Scholar
• Pyc, M., & Rawson, K. (2010). Why testing improves memory: Mediator effectiveness hypothesis. Science, 330, 335. doi:10.1126/science.1191465
   Google Scholar
• Pyc, M., & Rawson, K. (2012). Why is test–restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 737–746. doi:10.1037/a0026166
   Google Scholar
• Raaijmakers, J. G., & Jakab, E. (2013). Rethinking inhibition theory: On the problematic status of the inhibition theory for forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 98–122. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. K., & Unsworth, N. (2015). Do participants differ in their cognitive abilities, task motivation, or personality characteristics as a function of time of participation? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. doi:10.1037/xlm0000215
   Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. (2006a). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181–210. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x
   Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. (2006b). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249–255. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1432–1463. doi:10.1037/a0037559
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, C. A., & DeLosh, E. L. (2014a). Mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice at short retention intervals. Memory, 1–17. doi:10.1080/09658211.2014.889710
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, C. A., & DeLosh, E. L. (2014b). Benefits of testing for nontested information: Retrieval-induced facilitation of episodically bound material. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 1–8. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0625-2
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, C. A., Littrell-Baez, M. K., Sensenig, A. E., & DeLosh, E. L. (2014). Testing effects in mixed- versus pure-list designs. Memory & Cognition, 42, 912–921. doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0404-3
   Google Scholar
• Sahakyan, L., Delaney, P. F., & Kelley, C. M. (2004). Self-evaluation as a moderating factor of strategy change in directed forgetting benefits. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 131–136. doi:10.3758/BF03206472
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. M. (1988). Enviornmental context dependent memory. In G. M. Davies & D. M. Thomson (Eds.), Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 13–34). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Soderstrom, N. C., & Bjork, R. A. (2014). Testing facilitates the regulation of subsequent study time. Journal of Memory and Language, 73, 99–115. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2014.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Szpunar, K. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Testing during study insulates against the buildup of proactive interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1392–1399. doi:10.1037/a0013082
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, R. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2013). Testing and feedback effects on front-end control over later retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 437–450. doi:10.1037/a0028886
   Google Scholar
• Toppino, T. C., & Cohen, M. S. (2009). The testing effect and the retention interval: Questions and answers. Experimental Psychology, 56, 252–257. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.252
   Google Scholar
• Tulving, E., & Watkins, M. J. (1974). On negative transfer: Effects of testing one list on the recall of another. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 181–193. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80043-5
   Google Scholar
• Veltre, M. T., Cho, K. W., & Neely, J. H. (2015). Transfer-appropriate processing in the testing effect. Memory, 23, 1229–1237. doi:10.1080/09658211.2014.970196
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (1966). Motivation and memory. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 1–22. doi:10.1037/h0093896
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B., & Walker, E. L. (1966). Motivational factors in short-term retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 190–193. doi:10.1037/h0022848
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, Y., Gilmore, A. W., Szpunar, K. K., & McDermott, K. B. (2014). The role of test expectancy in the build-up of proactive interference in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1039–1048. doi:10.1037/a0036164
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, Y., McDermott, K. B., & Szpunar, K. K. (2011). Testing protects against proactive interference in face–name learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 518–523. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0085-x
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, D. D., & Simpson, C. K. (1968). Trace cue position, motivation, and short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 282–285. doi:10.1037/h0025386
   Google Scholar
• Wissman, K. T., Rawson, K. A., & Pyc, M. A. (2011). The interim test effect: Testing prior material can facilitate the learning of new material. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 1140–1147. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0140-7
   Google Scholar