Objects but not concepts modulate the size of the attended region

References

• Awh, E., Belopsolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(8), 437–443. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010
   Google Scholar
• Benso, F., Turatto, B., & Gastone, G. (1998). The time course of attentional focusing. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 10(4), 373–388. doi:10.1080/713752283
   Google Scholar
• Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433–436. doi:10.1163/156856897X00357
   Google Scholar
• Bush, W. S., & Vecera, S. P. (2014). Differential effect of one versus two hands on visual processing. Cognition, 133(1), 232–237. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.014
   Google Scholar
• Carrasco, M., Loula, F., & Ho, Y.-X. (2006). How attention enhances spatial resolution: Evidence from selective adaptation to spatial frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 68(6), 1004–1012. doi:10.3758/BF03193361
   Google Scholar
• Castiello, U., & Umiltà, C. (1990). Size of the attentional focus and efficiency of processing. Acta Psychologica, 73(3), 195–209. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(90)90022-8
   Google Scholar
• Chasteen, A. L., Burdzy, D. C., & Pratt, J. (2010). Thinking of God moves attention. Neuropsychologia, 48(2), 627–630. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.029
   Google Scholar
• Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1(1), 42–45. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.01.1.p042
   Google Scholar
• Dudschig, C., Souman, J., Lachmair, M., de la Vega, I., & Kaup, B. (2013). Reading “sun” and looking up: The influence of language on saccadic eye movements in the vertical dimension. Plos One, 8(2), doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056872
   Google Scholar
• Dumais, S. T. (2005). Latent semantic analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38(1), 188–230. doi:10.1002/aris.1440380105
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1972). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 12(2-B), 201–204. doi:10.3758/BF03212870
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(4), 225–240. doi:10.3758/BF03211502
   Google Scholar
• Estes, Z., Verges, M., & Adelman, J. S. (2015). Words, objects, and locations: Perceptual matching explains spatial interference and facilitation. Journal of Memory and Language, 84, 167–189. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Estes, Z., Verges, M., & Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Head up, foot down: Object words orient attention to the objects’ typical location. Psychological Science, 19(2), 93–97. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02051.x
   Google Scholar
• Feldmann-Wustefeld, T., & Schubo, A. (2013). Textures shape the attentional focus: evidence from exogenous and endogenous cueing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(8), 1644–1666. doi:10.3758/s13414-013-0508-z
   Google Scholar
• Frischen, A., Bayliss, A. P., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 694–724. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.694
   Google Scholar
• Galton, F. (1880). Visualised numerals. Nature, 21, 252–256. doi: 10.1038/021252a0
   Google Scholar
• Giordano, A. M., McElree, B., & Carrasco, M. (2009). On the automaticity and flexibility of covert attention: A speed-accuracy trade-off analysis. Journal of Vision, 9(3), 30–30. doi: 10.1167/9.3.30
   Google Scholar
• Gobell, J., & Carrasco, M. (2005). Attention alters the appearance of spatial frequency and gap size. Psychological Science, 16(8), 644–651. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01588.x
   Google Scholar
• Goodhew, S. C., Freire, M. R., & Edwards, M. (2015). Enhanced semantic priming in synesthetes independent of sensory binding. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 443–456. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2015.02.019
   Google Scholar
• Goodhew, S. C., & Kidd, E. (2015). The conceptual cueing database: Rated items for the study of the interaction between language and attention. Behavior Research Methods. Advance online publication. doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0625-9
   Google Scholar
• Goodhew, S. C., McGaw, B., & Kidd, E. (2014). Why is the sunny side always up? Explaining the spatial mapping of concepts by language use. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(5), 1287–1293. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0593-6
   Google Scholar
• Goodhew, S. C., Shen, E., & Edwards, M. (in press). Selective spatial enhancement: Attentional spotlight size impacts spatial but not temporal perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0904-6
   Google Scholar
• Gozli, D. G., Chasteen, A. L., & Pratt, J. (2013). The cost and benefit of implicit conceptual cues for visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. doi:10.1037/a0030362
   Google Scholar
• Gozli, D. G., Chow, A., Chasteen, A. L., & Pratt, J. (2013). Valence and vertical space: Saccade trajectory deviations reveal metaphorical spatial activation. Visual Cognition, 21(5), 628–646. doi:10.1080/13506285.2013.815680
   Google Scholar
• Hein, E., Rolke, B., & Ulrich, R. (2006). Visual attention and temporal discrimination: Differential effects of automatic and voluntary cueing. Visual Cognition, 13(1), 29–50. doi:10.1080/13506280500143524
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, S., & Louwerse, M. M. (2013). Language statistics explain the spatial-numerical association of response codes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0492-2
   Google Scholar
• LaBerge, D. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9(3), 371–379. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.9.3.371
   Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Darrell, L. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259–284. doi:10.1080/01638539809545028
   Google Scholar
• Latent Semantic Analysis @ CU Boulder. (1998). Retrieved from http://lsa.colorado.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Louwerse, M. M. (2008). Embodied relations are encoded in language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(4), 838–844. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.4.838
   Google Scholar
• Louwerse, M. M., & Jeuniaux, P. (2010). The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing. Cognition, 114(1), 96–104. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Mattingley, J. B., Rich, A. N., Yelland, G., & Bradshaw, J. L. (2001). Unconscious priming eliminates automatic binding of colour and alphanumeric form in synaesthesia. Nature, 410(6828), 580–582. doi:10.1038/35069062
   Google Scholar
• Michel, J. B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., Veres, A., Gray, M. K., Pickett, J. P., … Google Books, T. (2011). Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science, 331(6014), 176–182. doi:10.1126/science.1199644
   Google Scholar
• Muller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(2), 315–330. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.15.2.315
   Google Scholar
• Nakayama, K., & Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research, 29(11), 1631–1647. doi:10.1016/0042-698928892990144-2
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25. doi:10.1080/00335558008248231
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention & performance X (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Setic, M., & Domijan, D. (2007). The influence of vertical spatial orientation on property verification. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(2), 297–312. doi:10.1080/01690960600732430
   Google Scholar
• Simner, J. (2007). Beyond perception: Synaesthesia as a psycholinguistic phenomenon. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(1), 23–29. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.010
   Google Scholar
• Weger, U. W., & Pratt, J. (2008). Time flies like an arrow: Space-time compatibility effects suggest the use of a mental timeline. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(2), 426–430. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.2.426
   Google Scholar
• Yeshurun, Y., & Levy, L. (2003). Transient spatial attention degrades temporal resolution. Psychological Science, 14(3), 225–231. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.02436
   Google Scholar
• Yeshurun, Y., & Marom, G. (2008). Transient spatial attention and the perceived duration of brief visual events. Visual Cognition, 16(6), 826–848. doi:10.1080/13506280701588022
   Google Scholar
• Yeshurun, Y., & Sabo, G. (2012). Differential effects of transient attention on inferred parvocellular and magnocellular processing. Vision Research, 74, 21–29. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2012.06.006
   Google Scholar