Summation effects in human learning: evidence from patterning discriminations in goal-tracking

References

• Bellingham, W. P., Gillette-Bellingham, K., & Kehoe, E. J. (1985). Summation and configuration 2016 schedules with the rat and rabbit. Animal Learning & Behavior, 13, 152–164. doi: 10.3758/BF03199268
   Google Scholar
• Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00357
   Google Scholar
• Brandon, S. E., Vogel, E. H., & Wagner, A. R. (2000). A componential view of configural cues in generalization and discrimination in Pavlovian conditioning. Behavioural Brain Research, 110, 67–72. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(99)00185-0
   Google Scholar
• Deisig, N., Sandoz, J. C., Giurfa, M., & Lachnit, H. (2007). The trial-spacing effect in olfactory patterning discriminations in honeybees. Behavioural Brain Research, 176(2), 314–322. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.10.019
   Google Scholar
• Delamater, A. R., Sosa, W., & Katz, M. (1999). Elemental and configural processes in patterning discrimination learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52B, 97–124.
   Google Scholar
• Ghirlanda, S. (2015). On elemental and configural models of associative learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 64–65, 8–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2014.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. A. (2006). Elemental representations of stimuli in associative learning. Psychological Review, 113, 584–605. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.584
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. A., Gharaei, S., & Moore, C. A. (2009). Representations of single and compound stimuli in negative and positive patterning. Learning & Behavior, 37, 230–245. doi: 10.3758/LB.37.3.230
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. A., & Livesey, E. J. (2010). An attention-modulated associative network. Learning & Behavior, 38, 1–26. doi: 10.3758/LB.38.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. A., Livesey, E. J., Gharaei, S., & Westbrook, R. F. (2008). Negative patterning is easier than a biconditional discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 494–500.
   Google Scholar
• Kehoe, E. J., Horne, A. J., Horne, P. S., & Macrae, M. (1994). Summation and configuration between and within sensory modalities in classical conditioning of the rabbit. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 19–26. doi: 10.3758/BF03199952
   Google Scholar
• Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., & Pelli, D. (2007). What’s new in psychtoolbox-3. Perception, 36, ECVP Abstract Supplement.
   Google Scholar
• Lachnit, H., & Kimmel, H. D. (1993). Positive and negative patterning in human classical skin conductance response conditioning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 21, 314–326. doi: 10.3758/BF03197997
   Google Scholar
• Lachnit, H., & Kimmel, H. D. (2000). Experimental manipulation of a unique cue in Pavlovian SCR conditioning with humans. Biological psychology, 53, 105–129. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0511(00)00043-0
   Google Scholar
• Lachnit, H., & Kinder, A. (2000). Stimulus representations in human pavlovian conditioning: Implications of missing negative transfer across response systems. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53B, 209–224. doi: 10.1080/027249900411155
   Google Scholar
• Livesey, E. J., Thorwart, A., & Harris, J. A. (2011). Comparing positive and negative patterning in human learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 2316–2333. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.605153
   Google Scholar
• Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276–298. doi: 10.1037/h0076778
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, I. P. L., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2000). An elemental model of associative learning: I. Latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 28, 211–246. doi: 10.3758/BF03200258
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, I. P. L., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2002). Associative learning and elemental representation: II. Generalization and discrimination. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30, 177–200. doi: 10.3758/BF03192828
   Google Scholar
• Melchers, K. G., Shanks, D. R., & Lachnit, H. (2008). Stimulus coding in human associative learning: Flexible representations of parts and wholes. Behavioural Processes, 77, 413–427. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.09.013
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61–73. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.61
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, J. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587–607. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.587
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532–552. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.6.532
   Google Scholar
• Redhead, E. S., & Pearce, J. M. (1995). Stimulus salience and negative patterning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 67–83.
   Google Scholar
• Rescorla, R. A. (1972). “Configural” conditioning in discrete-trial bar pressing. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 79, 307–317. doi: 10.1037/h0032553
   Google Scholar
• Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In A. Black, & W. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning. II. Current research and theory, (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Thein, T., Westbrook, R. F., & Harris, J. A. (2008). How the associative strengths of stimuli combine in compound: Summation and overshadowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 155–166.
   Google Scholar
• Thorwart, A. (2010). Stimulus representation and processing in human associative learning: An evaluation of current elemental and configural associative learning theories (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://archiv.ub.uni-marburg.de/diss/z2010/0076
   Google Scholar
• Thorwart, A., Harris, J. A., & Lachnit. H. (2016). An inhibited elements model–computational implementation and simulations. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Thorwart, A., & Lachnit, H. (2009). Symmetrical generalization decrements: Configural stimulus processing in human contingency learning. Learning & Behavior, 37, 107–115. doi: 10.3758/LB.37.1.107
   Google Scholar
• Thorwart, A., Livesey, E. J., & Harris, J. A. (2012). Normalization between stimulus elements in a model of Pavlovian conditioning: Showjumping on an elemental horse. Learning & Behavior, 40, 334–346. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0073-7
   Google Scholar
• Thorwart, A., Schultheis, H., König, S., & Lachnit, H. (2009). ALTSim: A MATLAB simulator for current associative learning theories. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 29–34. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.1.29
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, A. R. (2003). Context-sensitive elemental theory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56B, 7–29. doi: 10.1080/02724990244000133
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, A. R., & Brandon, S. E. (2001). A componential theory of Pavlovian conditioning. In R. Mowrer, & S. Klein (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary learning theories, chap. 2, (pp. 23–63). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Whitlow Jr, J. W. (2010). Effect of outcome valence on positive and negative patterning in human causal reasoning. Learning & Behavior, 38, 145–159. doi: 10.3758/LB.38.2.145
   Google Scholar
• Whitlow Jr, J. W. (2013). A positive patterning advantage with complex but not simple patterning: A cue constellation approach. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 2118–2134. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.773523
   Google Scholar
• Whitlow Jr, J. W., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). Negative patterning in classical conditioning: Summation of response tendencies to isolable and configural components. Psychonomic Science, 27, 299–301. doi: 10.3758/BF03328970
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. E., Wasserman, E. A., Johnson, J. L., & Jones, F. L. (2000). Positive and negative patterning in human causal learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53B, 121–138. doi: 10.1080/713932723
   Google Scholar