Extrapolating human judgments from skip-gram vector representations of word meaning

References

• Abercrombie, H. C., Kalin, N. H., Thurow, M. E., Rosenkranz, M. A., & Davidson, R. J. (2003). Cortisol variation in humans affects memory for emotionally laden and neutral information. Behavioral Neuroscience, 117(3), 505–516. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.117.3.505
   Google Scholar
• Adelman, J. S., Marquis, S. J., Sabatos-DeVito, M. G., & Estes, Z. (2013). The unexplained nature of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(4), 1037–1053.
   Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., … Treiman, R. (2007). The english lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459. doi: 10.3758/BF03193014
   Google Scholar
• Bestgen, Y., & Vincze, N. (2012). Checking and bootstrapping lexical norms by means of word similarity indexes. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 998–1006. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0195-z
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings (pp. 1–45). Technical report C-1, the center for research in psychophysiology, University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., Buchmeier, M., Conrad, M., Jacobs, A. M., Bölte, J., & Böhl, A. (2011). The word frequency effect: A review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German. Experimental Psychology, 58, 412–424. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000123
   Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
   Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 904–911. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 33(4), 497–505. doi: 10.1080/14640748108400805
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. doi: 10.1037/h0040957
   Google Scholar
• Durda, K., & Buchanan, L. (2008). WINDSORS: Windsor improved norms of distance and similarity of representations of semantics. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 705–712. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.705
   Google Scholar
• Go, A., Bhayani, R., & Huang, L. (2009). Twitter sentiment classification using distant supervision. CS224N Project Report, Stanford, 1, 12.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, Y., & Levy, O. (2014). word2vec explained: Deriving Mikolov et al.’s negative-sampling word-embedding method. arXiv preprint arXiv:1402.3722.
   Google Scholar
• Hamann, S., & Mao, H. (2002). Positive and negative emotional verbal stimuli elicit activity in the left amygdala. Neuroreport, 13(1), 15–19. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200201210-00008
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, M. J., Kuchinke, L., Biemann, C., Tamm, S., & Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Remembering words in context as predicted by an associative read-out model. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 252. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00252
   Google Scholar
• Hollis, G., & Westbury, C. (in press). The principals of meaning: Extracting semantic dimensions from co-occurrence models of semantics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1053-2
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. N., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2007). Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon. Psychological Review, 114, 1–37. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Diependaele, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Practice effects in large-scale visual word recognition studies: A lexical decision study on 14,000 Dutch mono-and disyllabic words and nonwords. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 174. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00174
   Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). The British lexicon project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 287–304. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0118-4
   Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 978–990. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4
   Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211–240. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, R. J., Mercer, K. A., & Balota, D. (2006). Lexical characteristics of words used in emotion Stroop studies. Emotion, 6, 62–72. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.62
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, R. J., Mercer, K. A., Balota, D. A., & Strube, M. J. (2008). Not all negative words slow down lexical decision and naming speed: Importance of word arousal. Emotion, 8(4), 445–452. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.8.4.445
   Google Scholar
• Levy, O., & Goldberg, Y. (2014). Neural word embedding as implicit matrix factorization. In Z. Ghahramani, M. Welling, C. Cortes, N. D. Lawrence, & K. Q. Weinberger (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 27 (pp. 2177–2185). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, B. (2015). Sentiment analysis: Mining opinions, sentiments, and emotions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2005). The automaticity of affect for political leaders, groups, and issues: An experimental test of the hot cognition hypothesis. Political Psychology, 26(3), 455–482. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00426.x
   Google Scholar
• Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28(2), 203–208. doi: 10.3758/BF03204766
   Google Scholar
• Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2015). How useful are corpus-based methods for extrapolating psycholinguistic variables? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1623–1642. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.988735
   Google Scholar
• Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013). Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781.
   Google Scholar
• Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G. S., & Dean, J. (2013). Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Neural Information Processing Systems Conference, 2013; pp. 3111–3119).
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pak, A., & Paroubek, P. (2010, May). Twitter as a Corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In LREc (Vol. 10, pp. 1320–1326).
   Google Scholar
• Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2004, July). A sentimental education: Sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In Proceedings of the 42nd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (p. 271). Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Recchia, G., & Louwerse, M. M. (2015). Reproducing affective norms with lexical co-occurrence statistics: Predicting valence, arousal, and dominance. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1584–1598. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.941296
   Google Scholar
• Rescorla, R. A. (1988). Pavlovian conditioning: It's not what you think it is. American Psychologist, 43(3), 151–160. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.43.3.151
   Google Scholar
• Rhode, D. L. T., Gonnerman, L. M., & Plaut, D. C. (2007). An improved method for deriving word meaning from lexical co-occurrence. Unpublished manuscript. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved April 20, 2007, from http://tedlab.mit.edu/~dr/
   Google Scholar
• Shaoul, C., & Westbury, C. (2006). Word frequency effects in high-dimensional co-occurrence models: A new approach. Behavior Research Methods, 38(2), 190–195. doi: 10.3758/BF03192768
   Google Scholar
• Shaoul, C., & Westbury, C. (2010a). Exploring lexical co-occurrence space using HiDEx. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 393–413. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.2.393
   Google Scholar
• Shaoul, C., & Westbury, C. (2010b). The Westbury lab wikipedia corpus. Edmonton, AB: University of Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Shaoul, C., & Westbury, C. (2011). HiDEx: The high dimensional explorer. In P. McCarthy & C. Boonthum (Eds.), Applied natural language processing and content analysis: Identification, investigation, and resolution (pp. 230–246). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Staiano, J., & Guerini, M. (2014). DepecheMood: A Lexicon for emotion analysis from crowd-annotated news. arXiv preprint arXiv:1405.1605.
   Google Scholar
• Võ, M. L., Conrad, M., Kuchinke, L., Urton, K., Hofmann, M. J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). The Berlin affective word list reloaded (BAWL-R). Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 534–538. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.2.534
   Google Scholar
• Wallot, S. (2014). From “cracking the orthographic code” to “playing with language”: Toward a usage-based foundation of the reading process. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 891. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00891
   Google Scholar
• Wallot, S., Hollis, G., & van Rooij, M. (2013). Connected text reading and differences in text reading fluency in adult readers. PloS one, 8(8), e71914. Advance online publication. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071914
   Google Scholar
• Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1191–1207. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x
   Google Scholar
• Westbury, C. (2013). You can’t drink a word: Lexical and individual emotionality affect subjective familiarity judgments. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 43(5), 631–649. doi: 10.1007/s10936-013-9266-2
   Google Scholar
• Westbury, C., Keith, J., Briesemeister, B. B., Hofmann, M. J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Avoid violence, rioting, and outrage; approach celebration, delight, and strength: Using large text corpora to compute valence, arousal, and the basic emotions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1599–1622. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.970204
   Google Scholar
• Westbury, C. F., Shaoul, C., Hollis, G., Smithson, L., Briesemeister, B. B., Hofmann, M. J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2013). Now you see it, now you don’t: On emotion, context, & the algorithmic prediction of human imageability judgments. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 991.  Advance online publication. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00991
   Google Scholar
• Word2vec: Tool for computing continuous distributed representations of words. (2013). Retrieved October 18, 2015, from https://code.google.com/p/word2vec/
   Google Scholar