The impact of arbitrarily applicable relational responding on evaluative learning about hypothetical money and shock outcomes

References

• Arcediano, F., & Miller, R. R. (2002). Some constraints for models of timing: A temporal coding hypothesis perspective. Learning and Motivation, 33, 105–123. doi: 10.1006/lmot.2001.1102
   Google Scholar
• Barnet, R. C., & Miller, R. R. (1996). Second-order excitation mediated by a backward conditioned inhibitor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 279–296.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49–59. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
   Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2007). A conceptual and theoretical analysis of evaluative conditioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 230–241. Retrieved from http://www.ucm.es/info/psi/docs/journal/ doi: 10.1017/S1138741600006491
   Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2009). The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learning & Behavior, 37, 1–20. doi:10.3758/LB.37.1.1
   Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2011). Why the cognitive approach in psychology would profit from a functional approach and vice versa. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 202–209. doi: 10.1177/1745691611400238
   Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J., Gawronski, B., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2013). A functional-cognitive framework for attitude research. European Review of Social Psychology, 24, 252–287. doi: 10.1080/10463283.2014.892320
   Google Scholar
• Dymond, S., & Barnes, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more than, and less than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 163–184. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-163
   Google Scholar
• Dymond, S., & Rehfeldt, R. (2000). Understanding complex behaviour: The transformation of stimulus functions. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 239–254.
   Google Scholar
• Dymond, S., & Roche, B. (2013). Advances in relational frame theory: Research and application. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
   Google Scholar
• Fielder, K., & Unkelbach, C. (2011). Evaluative conditioning depends on higher-order encoding processes. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 639–656. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.513497
   Google Scholar
• Fienup, D. M., Covey, D. P., & Critchfield, T. S. (2010). Teaching brain-behavior relations economically with stimulus equivalence technology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 19–33. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-19
   Google Scholar
• Frederick, S., & Mochon, D. (2012). A scale distortion theory of anchoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 124–133. doi: 10.1037/a0024006
   Google Scholar
• Gast, A., & De Houwer, J. (2012). Evaluative conditioning without directly experienced pairings of the conditioned and the unconditioned stimuli. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1657–1674. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.665061
   Google Scholar
• Gast, A., Gawronski, B., & De Houwer, J. (2012). Evaluative conditioning: Recent developments and future directions. Learning & Motivation, 43, 79–88. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2012.06.004
   Google Scholar
• Gross, A. C., & Fox, E. J. (2009). Relational frame theory: An overview of the controversy. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 25, 87–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. C. (1994). Content, context, and the types of psychological acceptance. In S. C. Hayes, N. S. Jacobson, V. M. Follette, & M. J. Dougher (Eds.), Acceptance and change: Content and context in psychotherapy (pp. 13–32). Reno, NV: Context Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, W., De Houwer, J., Perugini, M., Baeyens, F., & Crombez, G. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 390–421. doi:10.1037/a0018916
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, S., Barnes-Holmes, D., & De Houwer, J. (2011). The dominance of associative theorising in implicit attitude research: Propositional and behavioral alternatives. Psychological Record, 61, 465–496.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, S., De Houwer, J., & Perugini, M. (2016). Expanding the boundaries of evaluative learning research: How intersecting regularities shape our likes and dislikes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. doi:10.1037/xge0000100
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. R., Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2010). Evaluative conditioning: The “how” question. In Advances in experimental social psychology vol. 43 (pp. 205–255). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kattner, F., Ellermeier, W., & Tavakoli, P. (2012). Both trace and delay conditioning of evaluative responses depend on contingency awareness. Learning and Motivation, 43, 35–47. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2012.01.004
   Google Scholar
• Lagnado, D. A., Waldmann, M. R., Hagmayer, Y., & Sloman, S. A. (2007). Beyond covariation: Cues to causal structure. In A. Gopnik & L. Schulz (Eds.), Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy, and computation (pp. 154–172). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levey, A. B., & Martin, I. (1975). Classical conditioning of human “evaluation” responses. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 13, 221–226. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(75)90026-1
   Google Scholar
• Melchers, K. G., Lachnit, H., & Shanks, D. R. (2004). Within-compound associations in retrospective revaluation and in direct learning: A challenge for comparator theory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section B, 57, 25–53. doi:10.1080/02724990344000042
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. J., De Houwer, J., & Lovibond, P. F. (2009). The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 183–198. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000855
   Google Scholar
• Molet, M., Macquet, B., & Charley, G. (2013). Relational responding modulates and reverses affective ratings in evaluative conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 44, 137–142. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2012.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Munnelly, A., Dymond, S., & Hinton, E. C. (2010). Relational reasoning with derived comparative relations: A novel model of transitive inference. Behavioural Processes, 85, 8–17. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.05.007
   Google Scholar
• Munnelly, A., Freegard, G., & Dymond, S. (2013). Constructing relational sentences: Establishing arbitrarily applicable comparative relations with the Relational Completion Procedure. The Psychological Record, 63, 751–768. doi: 10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.4.004
   Google Scholar
• Peters, K. R., & Gawronski, B. (2011). Are we puppets on a string? Comparing the impact of contingency and validity on implicit and explicit evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 557–569. doi:10.1177/0146167211400423
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, R. W., & Urcuioli, P. J. (2015). Functional relations and cognitive psychology: Lessons from human performance and animal research. International Journal of Psychology. doi:10.1002/ijop.12182
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, T., Whelan, R., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2005). The effect of training structure on the latency of responses to a five-term linear chain. The Psychological Record, 55, 233–249.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, I. (2016). The fruits of a functional approach for psychological science. International Journal of Psychology, 51, 15–27. doi:10.1002/ijop.12184
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, I., Barrett, K., McHugh, L., Barnes-Holmes, D., & O’Hora, D. (2013). Multiple contextual control over non-arbitrary relational responding and a preliminary model of pragmatic verbal analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 100, 174–186. doi: 10.1002/jeab.39
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, I., & McElwee, J. (2009). Relational responding and conditional discrimination procedures: An apparent inconsistency and clarification. The Behavior Analyst, 32, 309–317.
   Google Scholar
• Whelan, R., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Dymond, S. (2006). The transformation of consequential functions in accordance with the relational frames of more-than and less-than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 86, 317–335. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.113-04
   Google Scholar
• Zanon, R., De Houwer, J., & Gast, A. (2012). Context effects in evaluative conditioning of implicit evaluations. Learning and Motivation, 43, 155–165. doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2012.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Zanon, R., De Houwer, J., Gast, A., & Tucker Smith, C. (2014). When does relational information influence evaluative conditioning? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 2105–2122. doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.907324
   Google Scholar