The male advantage in child facial resemblance detection: Behavioral and ERP evidence

References

• Alvergne, A., Faurie, C., & Raymond, M. (2007). Differential facial resemblance of young children to their parents: Who do children look like more? Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(2), 135–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvergne, A., Faurie, C., & Raymond, M. (2009). Father-offspring resemblance predicts paternal investment in humans. Animal Behaviour, 78(1), 61–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvergne, A., Faurie, C., & Raymond, M. (2010). Are parents’ perceptions of offspring facial resemblance consistent with actual resemblance? Effects on parental investment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(1), 7–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasi, J. S., & Rhodes, M. G. (2005). An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adults. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(6), 1043–1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. (2004). The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love. NeuroImage, 21(3), 1155–1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batty, M., & Taylor, M. J. (2003). Early processing of the six basic facial emotional expressions. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(3), 613–620.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bentin, S., & Deouell, L. Y. (2000). Structural encoding and identification in face processing: ERP evidence for separate mechanisms. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17(1–3), 35–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bredart, S., & French, R. M. (1999). Do babies resemble their fathers more than their mothers? A failure to replicate Christenfeld and Hill (1995). Evolution and Human Behavior, 20(2), 129–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressan, P. (2002). Why babies look like their daddies: Paternity uncertainty and the evolution of self-deception in evaluating family resemblance. Acta Ethologica, 4(2), 113–118.
   Google Scholar
• Bressan, P., Bertamini, M., Nalli, A., & Zanutto, A. (2009). Men do not have a stronger preference than women for self-resemblant child faces. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(5), 657–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressan, P., & Dal Martello, M. F. (2002). Talis pater, talis filius: Perceived resemblance and the belief in genetic relatedness. Psychological Science, 13(3), 213–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressan, P., & Grassi, M. (2004). Parental resemblance in 1-year-olds and the Gaussian curve. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(3), 133–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burch, R. L., & Gallup, G. G. (2000). Perceptions of paternal resemblance predict family violence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21(6), 429–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cauquil, A. S., Edmonds, G. E., & Taylor, M. J. (2000). Is the face-sensitive N170 the only ERP not affected by selective attention? NeuroReport, 11(10), 2167–2171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daffner, K. R., Mesulam, M. M., Scinto, L. F. M., Cohen, L. G., Kennedy, B. P., West, W. C., & Holcomb, P. J. (1998). Regulation of attention to novel stimuli by frontal lobes: An event-related potential study. NeuroReport, 9(5), 787–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dal Martello, M. F., & Maloney, L. T. (2006). Where are kin recognition signals in the human face? Journal of Vision, 6(12), 1356–1366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, M., & Wilson, M. I. (1982). Whom are newborn babies said to resemble. Ethology and Sociobiology, 3(2), 69–78.
   Google Scholar
• DeBruine, L. M. (2002). Facial resemblance enhances trust. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 269(1498), 1307–1312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBruine, L. M. (2004a). Facial resemblance increases the attractiveness of same-sex faces more than other-sex faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 271(1552), 2085–2090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBruine, L. M. (2004b). Resemblance to self increases the appeal of child faces to both men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(3), 142–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBruine, L. M. (2005). Trustworthy but not lust-worthy: Context-specific effects of facial resemblance. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 272(1566), 919–922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2008). Social perception of facial resemblance in humans. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37(1), 64–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBruine, L. M., Smith, F. G., Jones, B. C., Roberts, S. C., Petrie, M., & Spector, T. D. (2009). Kin recognition signals in adult faces. Vision Research, 49(1), 38–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donkers, F. C. L., & van Boxtel, G. J. M. (2004). The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition. Brain and Cognition, 56(2), 165–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimer, M. (2000). The face-specific N170 component reflects late stages in the structural encoding of faces. NeuroReport, 11(10), 2319–2324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimer, M., & Holmes, A. (2002). An ERP study on the time course of emotional face processing. NeuroReport, 13(4), 427–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossati, P., Hevenor, S. J., Graham, S. J., Grady, C., Keightley, M. L., Craik, F., & Mayberg, H. (2003). In search of the emotional self: An fMRI study using positive and negative emotional words. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(11), 1938–1945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasso, D. J., Moser, J. S., Dozier, M., & Simons, R. (2009). ERP correlates of attention allocation in mothers processing faces of their children. Biological Psychology, 81(2), 95–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasso, D. J., & Simons, R. F. (2011). Perceived parental support predicts enhanced late positive event-related brain potentials to parent faces. Biological Psychology, 86(1), 26–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halit, H., de Haan, M., Schyns, P. G., & Johnson, M. H. (2006). Is high-spatial frequency information used in the early stages of face detection? Brain Research, 1117, 154–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, W. D. (1964). Genetical evolution of social behaviour I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1), 1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, V., & Hole, G. J. (2009). Evidence for a contact-based explanation of the own-age bias in face recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 264–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauber, M. E., & Sherman, P. W. (2001). Self-referent phenotype matching: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Trends Neuroscience, 24(10), 609–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, R. N., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., Ganel, T., Otten, L. J., Quayle, A., & Rugg, M. D. (2003). Electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of face perception, recognition and priming. Cerebral Cortex, 13(7), 793–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills, P. J., & Lewis, M. B. (2011). The own-age face recognition bias in children and adults. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(1), 17–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, A., Winston, J. S., & Eimer, M. (2005). The role of spatial frequency information for ERP components sensitive to faces and emotional facial expression. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(2), 508–520.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hu, X. Q., Wu, H. Y., & Fu, G. Y. (2011). Temporal course of executive control when lying about self- and other-referential information: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1369, 149–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itier, R. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2004). N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. Cerebral Cortex, 14(2), 132–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jemel, B., Schuller, A. M., Cheref-Khan, Y., Goffaux, V., Crommelinck, M., & Bruyer, R. (2003). Stepwise emergence of the face-sensitive N170 event-related potential component. NeuroReport, 14(16), 2035–2039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminski, G., Dridi, S., Graff, C., & Gentaz, E. (2009). Human ability to detect kinship in strangers’ faces: Effects of the degree of relatedness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 276(1670), 3193–3200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminski, G., Ravary, F., Graff, C., & Gentaz, E. (2010). Firstborns’ disadvantage in kinship detection. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1746–1750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kircher, T. T. J., Senior, C., Phillips, M. L., Rabe-Hesketh, S., Benson, P. J., Bullmore, E. T., … David, A. S. (2001). Recognizing one’s own face. Cognition, 78(1), B1–B15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langeslag, S. J. E., Jansma, B. A., Franken, I. H. A., & Van Strien, J. W. (2007). Event-related potential responses to love-related facial stimuli. Biological Psychology, 76(1–2), 109–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. M. G. (2011). The sibling uncertainty hypothesis: Facial resemblance as a sibling recognition cue. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), 969–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Y. N., & Han, S. H. (2009). Self-face advantage is modulated by social threat—Boss effect on self-face recognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 1048–1051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney, L. T., & Dal Martello, M. F. (2006). Kin recognition and the perceived facial similarity of children. Journal of Vision, 6(10), 1047–1056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangun, G. R., Buonocore, M. H., Girelli, M., & Jha, A. P. (1998). ERP and fMRI measures of visual spatial selective attention. Human Brain Mapping, 6(5–6), 383–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, E. H., Smulders, F. T. Y., Merckelbach, H. L. G. J., & Wolf, A. G. (2007). The P300 is sensitive to concealed face recognition. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 66, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Melinder, A., Gredeback, G., Westerlund, A., & Nelson, C. A. (2010). Brain activation during upright and inverted encoding of own- and other-age faces: ERP evidence for an own-age bias. Developmental Science, 13(4), 588–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyakoshi, M., Kanayama, N., Iidaka, T., & Ohira, H. (2010). EEG evidence of face-specific visual self-representation. NeuroImage, 50(4), 1666–1675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neff, B. D., & Sherman, P. W. (2002). Decision making and recognition mechanisms. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 269(1499), 1435–1441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesse, R. M., Silverman, A., & Bortz, A. (1990). Sex-differences in ability to recognize family resemblance. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11(1), 11–21.
   Google Scholar
• Nessler, D., Mecklinger, A., & Penney, T. B. (2005). Perceptual fluency, semantic familiarity and recognition-related familiarity: An electrophysiological exploration. Cognitive Brain Research, 22(2), 265–288.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ninomiya, H., Onitsuka, T., Chen, C. H., Sato, E., & Tashiro, N. (1998). P300 in response to the subject’s own face. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 52(5),519–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oda, R., Matsumoto-Oda, A., & Kurashima, O. (2002). Facial resemblance of Japanese children to their parents. Journal of Ethology, 20(2), 81–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paradis, A. L., Cornilleau-Peres, V., Droulez, J., Van de Moortele, P. F., Lobel, E., Berthoz, A., … Poline, J. B. (2000). Visual perception of motion and 3-D structure from motion: An fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 10(8), 772–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platek, S. M., Burch, R. L., Panyavin, I. S., Wasserman, B. H., & Gallup, G. G. (2002). Reactions to children’s faces—Resemblance affects males more than females. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(3), 159–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platek, S. M., Critton, S. R., Burch, R. L., Frederick, D. A., Myers, T. E., & Gallup, G. G. (2003). How much paternal resemblance is enough? Sex differences in hypothetical investment decisions but not in the detection of resemblance. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(2), 81–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platek, S. M., Keenan, J. P., Gallup, G. G., & Mohamed, F. B. (2004). Where am I? The neurological correlates of self and other. Cognitive Brain Research, 19(2), 114–122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Platek, S. M., Keenan, J. P., & Mohamed, F. B. (2005). Sex differences in the neural correlates of child facial resemblance: An event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage, 25(4), 1336–1344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platek, S. M., & Kemp, S. M. (2009). Is family special to the brain? An event-related fMRI study of familiar, familial, and self-face recognition. Neuropsychologia, 47(3), 849–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platek, S. M., Krill, A. L., & Kemp, S. M. (2008). The neural basis of facial resemblance. Neuroscience Letters, 437(2), 76–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platek, S. M., Krill, A. L., & Wilson, B. (2009). Implicit trustworthiness ratings of self-resembling faces activate brain centers involved in reward. Neuropsychologia, 47(1), 289–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platek, S. M., Loughead, J. W., Gur, R. C., Busch, S., Ruparel, K., Phend, N., … Langleben D. D. (2006). Neural substrates for functionally discriminating self-face from personally familiar faces. Human Brain Mapping, 27(2), 91–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platek, S. M., Raines, D. M., Gallup, G. G., Mohamed, F. B., Thomson, J. W., Myers, T. E., … Arigo, D. R. (2004). Reactions to children’s faces: Males are more affected by resemblance than females are, and so are their brains. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(6), 394–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purmann, S., Badde, S., Luna-Rodriguez, A., & Wendt, M. (2011). Adaptation to frequent conflict in the Eriksen flanker task: An ERP study. Journal of Psychophysiology, 25(2), 50–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehnman, J., & Herlitz, A. (2006). Higher face recognition ability in girls: Magnified by own-sex own-ethnicity bias. Memory, 14(3), 289–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, J. P., Shue, E., & Singer, E. (2007). Single versus multiple probe blocks of P300-based concealed information tests for self-referring versus incidentally obtained information. Biological Psychology, 74(3),396–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossion, B., Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Despland, P., Bruyer, R., Linotte, S., & Crommelinck, M. (2000). The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: An electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain. NeuroReport, 11(1), 69–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam, C. J., Visser, S. L., Decoul, A. A. W. O., Desonneville, L. M. J., Schellens, R. L. L. A., Brunia, C. H. M., … Gielen, G. (1993). Disturbed frontal regulation of attention in Parkinsons-disease. Brain,116, 1139–1158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, Y. H., Chen, A. T., Yin, H. Z., Qiu, J. A., Lv, J. Y., Wei, D. T., … Wang, T. (2010). Spatiotemporal cortical activation underlying self-referencial processing evoked by self-hand. Biological Psychology, 85(2),219–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui, J., Liu, C. H., & Han, S. H. (2009). Cultural difference in neural mechanisms of self-recognition. Social Neuroscience, 4(5), 402–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uddin, L. Q., Kaplan, J. T., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Zaidel, E., & Iacoboni, M. (2005). Self-face recognition activates a frontoparietal “mirror” network in the right hemisphere: An event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage, 25(3), 926–935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welling, L. L. M., Burriss, R. P., & Puts, D. A. (2011). Mate retention behavior modulates men’s preferences for self-resemblance in infant faces. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(2), 118–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiese, H., Schweinberger, S. R., & Hansen, K. (2008). The age of the beholder: ERP evidence of an own-age bias in face memory. Neuropsychologia, 46(12), 2973–2985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilckens, K. A., Tremel, J. J., Wolk, D. A., & Wheeler, M. E. (2011). Effects of task-set adoption on ERP correlates of controlled and automatic recognition memory. NeuroImage, 55(3), 1384–1392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolk, D. A., Schacter, D. L., Lygizos, M., Sen, N. M., Holcomb, P. J., Daffner, K. R., & Budson, A. E. (2006). ERP correlates of recognition memory: Effects of retention interval and false alarms. Brain Research, 1096, 148–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, N., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 931–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Zhou, T. G., Zhang, J., Liu, Z. X., Fan, J., & Zhu, Y. (2006). In search of the Chinese self: An fMRI study. Science in China Series C-Life Sciences, 49(1), 89–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, J., & Han, S. H. (2007). Neural basis of cultural influence on self-representation. NeuroImage, 34(3), 1310–1316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar