499
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Adapting effects of emotional expression in anxiety: Evidence for an enhanced Late Positive Potential

, , &
Pages 650-664 | Received 12 Apr 2013, Accepted 07 Oct 2013, Published online: 31 Oct 2013

REFERENCES

  • Afraz, S. R., & Cavanagh, P. (2008). Retinotopy of the face aftereffect. Vision Research, 48, 42–54.
  • Aviezer, H., Hassin, R. R., Ryan, J., Grady, C., Susskind, J., Anderson, A., … Bentin, S. (2008). Angry, disgust, or afraid? Studies on the malleability of emotion perception. Psychological Science, 19, 724–732.
  • Baloni, M., & Pozzoli, U. (2003). ERPs (Event-Related Potentials), semantic attribution, and facial expression of emotion. Consciousness and Emotion, 4, 63–80.
  • Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1–24.
  • Barlow, D. H. (2002). Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Barrett, L. F., Lindquist, K. A., & Gendron, M. (2007). Language as a context for the perception of emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 327–332.
  • Batty, M., & Taylor, M. J. (2003). Early processing of the six basic facial emotional expressions. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 613–620.
  • Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck depression inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
  • Bishop, S. J. (2007). Neurocognitive mechanisms of anxiety: An integrative account. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 307–316.
  • Blanchette, I., & Richards, A. (2003). Anxiety and the interpretation of ambiguous information: Beyond the emotion-congruent effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 294–309.
  • Blanchette, I., & Richards, A. (2010). The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgment, decision making and reasoning, invited review. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 561–595.
  • Blanchette, I., Richards, A., & Cross, A. (2007). Anxiety and the interpretation of ambiguous facial expressions: The influence of contextual cues. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1011–1116.
  • Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129–148.
  • Brown, T. A. (2007). Temporal course and structural relationships among dimensions of temperament and DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorder constructs. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116(2), 313–328.
  • Butler, A., Oruc, I., Fox, C. J., & Barton, J. J. S. (2008). Factors contributing to the adaptation aftereffects of facial expression. Brain Research, 1191, 116–126.
  • Caci, H., Baylé, F. J., Dossios, C., Robert, P., & Boyer, P. (2003). The Spielberger Trait Anxiety Inventory measures more than anxiety. European Psychiatry, 18, 394–400.
  • Caharel, S., d’Arripe, O., Ramon, M., Jacques, C., & Rossion, B. (2009). Early adaptation to unfamiliar faces across viewpoint changes in the right hemisphere: Evidence from the N170 ERP component. Neuropsychologia, 47, 639–643.
  • Calvo, M. G., & Castillo, M. D. (2001a). Bias in predictive inferences during reading. Discourse Processes, 32, 43–71.
  • Calvo, M. G., & Castillo, M. D. (2001b). Selective interpretation in anxiety: Uncertainty for threatening events. Cognition & Emotion, 15, 299–320.
  • Calvo, M. G., Castillo, M. D., & Estevez, A. (1999). On-line predictive inferences in reading: Processing time during versus after the priming context. Memory & Cognition, 27, 834–843.
  • Cisler, J. M., & Koster, E. H. W. (2010). Mechanisms of attentional bias towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 203–216.
  • Clifford, C. W. G., & Rhodes, G. (Eds.). (2005). Fitting the mind to the world: Adaptation and after-effects in high level vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cuthbert, B. N., Schupp, H. T., Bradley, M. M., Birbaumer, N., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Brain potentials in affective picture processing: Covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biological Psychology, 52, 95–111.
  • Dolan, R. J., & Vuilleumier, P. (2003). Amygdala automaticity in emotional processing. In P. Shinnick-Gallagher, A. Pitkänen, A. Shekhar, & L. Cahill (Eds.), The amygdala in brain function: Basic and clinical approaches (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (Vol. 985, pp. 348–355). New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences.
  • Eimer, M., & Holmes, A. (2007). Event-related brain potential correlates of emotional face processing. Neuropsychologia, 45, 15–31.
  • Eimer, M., Holmes, A., & McGlone, F. P. (2003). The role of spatial attention in the processing of facial expression: An ERP study of rapid brain response to six basic emotions. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioural Neurosciences, 3, 97–110.
  • Eizenman, M., Yu, L. H., Grupp, L., Eizenman, E., Ellenbogen, M., Gemar, M., & Levitan, R. D. (2003). A naturalistic visual scanning approach to assess selective attention in major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Research, 118, 117–128.
  • Ewbank, M. P., Lawson, R. P., Henson, R. N., Rowe, J. B., Passamonti, L., & Calder, A. J. (2011). Changes in “top-down” connectivity underlie repetition suppression in the ventral visual pathway. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 5635–5642.
  • Ewbank, M. P., Smith, W. A., Hancock, E. R., & Andrews, T. J. (2008). The M170 reflects a viewpoint-dependant representation of inanimate objects and places in human visual cortex. NeuroImage, 28, 268–279.
  • Eysenck, M., Mogg, K., May, J., Richards, A., & Mathews, A. (1991). Bias in interpretation of ambiguous sentences related to threat in anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 144–150.
  • Eysenck, M. W., & Calvo, M. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition & Emotion, 6, 409–434.
  • Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: The processing efficiency theory. Emotion, 7, 336–353.
  • Fiedler, K. (2000). Toward and integrative account of affect and cognition phenomena using the BIAS computer algorithm. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 223–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Foti, D., & Hajcak, G. (2008). Deconstructing reappraisal: Descriptions preceding arousing pictures modulate the subsequent neural response. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 977–988.
  • Fountoulakis, K. N., Vieta, E., Siamouli, M., Valenti, M., Magiria, S., Oral, T., … Kaprinis, G. S. (2007). Treatment of bipolar disorder: A complex treatment for a multi-faceted disorder. Annals of General Psychiatry, 9, 6–27.
  • Fox, C. J., & Barton, J. J. S. (2007). What is adapted in face adaptation? The neural representations of expression in the human visual system. Brain Research, 1127, 80–89.
  • Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 681–700.
  • Fox, E., & Standage, H. (2012). Variation on the serotonin transporter gene and bias in the interpretation of ambiguity. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 106–114.
  • Friederici, A. D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(2), 78–84.
  • Friston, K. (2005). A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B; Biological Transactions, 360, 1273–1302.
  • Furl, N., Kumar, S., Alter, K., Durrant, S., Shawe-Taylor, J., & Griffiths, R. D. (2011). Neural prediction of higher-order auditory sequence statistics. NeuroImage, 54, 2267–2277.
  • Furl, N., van Rijsbergen, N. J., Treves, A., & Dolan, R. J. (2007). Face adaptation aftereffects reveal anterior medial temporal cortex role in high level category representation. NeuroImage, 37, 300–310.
  • Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2001). Lexical ambiguity resolution and spoken word recognition: Bridging the gap. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 325–349.
  • Gootjes, L., Franken Ingmar, H. A., & Van Strien, J. W. (2011). Cognitive emotion regulation in yoga meditative practitioners sustained modulation of electrical brain potentials. Journal of Psychophysiology, 25, 87–94.
  • Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006). Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 14–23.
  • Henson, R. N., & Rugg, M. D. (2003). Neural response suppression, haemodynamic repetition and behavioural priming. Neuropsychologia, 41, 263–270.
  • Hertel, P. T., & El-Messidi, L. (2006). Am I blue? Depressed mood and the consequences of self-focus for the interpretation and recall of ambiguous words. Behavior Therapy, 37, 259–268.
  • Holmes, A., Nielsen, M. K., & Green, S. (2008). Effects of anxiety on the processing of fearful and happy faces: An event-related potential study. Biological Psychology, 77, 159–173.
  • Holmes, A., Nielsen, M. K., & Tipper, S. (2009). An electrophysiological investigation into the automaticity of emotional face processing in high versus low trait anxious individuals. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 323–334.
  • Huppert, J. D., Pasupuleti, R. V., Foa, E. B., & Mathews, A. (2007). Interpretation biases in social anxiety: Response generation, response selection, and self-appraisals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 1505–1515.
  • Junghöfer, M., Bradley, M. M., Elbert, T. R., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Fleeting images: A new look at early emotion discrimination. Psychophysiology, 38, Special Report, 175–178.
  • Kloth, N., Schweinberger, S. R., & Kovács, G. (2010). Neural correlates of generic versus gender-specific face adaptation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2345–2356.
  • Kovács, G., Zimmer, M., Harza, I., & Vidnyánszky, Z. (2007). Adaptation duration affects the spatial selectivity of facial aftereffects. Vision Research, 47, 3141–3149.
  • Lee, K.-Y., Lee, T.-H., Yoon, S.-J., Cho, Y. S., Choi, J.-S., & Kim, H. T. (2010). Neural correlates of top-down processing in emotion perception: An ERP study of emotional faces in white noise versus noise-alone stimuli. Brain Research, 1337, 56–63.
  • Leopold, D., O’Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., & Blanz, V. (2001). Prototyped-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 89–94.
  • Lucas, M. (1999). Context effects in lexical access: A meta-analysis. Memory & Cognition, 27, 385–398.
  • Lundqvist, D., Flykt, A., & Ohman, A. (1998). The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces –KDEF, CD ROM from Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology section, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. ISBN 91-6307-164-9.
  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25, 71–102.
  • Mathews, A., & Mackintosh, B. (2000). Induced emotional interpretation bias and anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 602–615.
  • Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (2002). Induced processing biases have causal effects on anxiety. Cognition & Emotion, 16, 331–354.
  • Mathews, A., Richards, A., & Eysenck, M. W. (1989). The interpretation of homophones related to threat in anxiety states. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 31–34.
  • Miller, I. W., & Norman, W. H. (1986). Persistence of depressive cognitions within a subgroup of depressed inpatients. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 10, 211–224.
  • Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (2005). Attentional bias in generalised anxiety disorder versus depressive disorder. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 29, 29–45.
  • Mogg, K., Garner, M., & Bradley, B. P. (2007). Anxiety and orienting of gaze to angry and fearful faces. Biological Psychology, 76, 163–169.
  • Moser, J. S., Hajcak, G., Bukay, E., & Simons, R. F. (2006). Intentional modulation of emotional responding to unpleasant pictures: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 43, 292–296.
  • Öhman, A., Lundqvist, D., & Esteves, F. (2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 381–396.
  • Olofsson, J. K., Nordin, S., Sequeira, H., & Polich, J. (2008). Affective picture processing: An integrative review of ERP findings. Biological Psychology, 77, 247–265.
  • Pell, P. J., & Richards, A. (2011). Cross-emotion facial expression aftereffects. Vision Research, 51, 1889–1896.
  • Pell, P. J., & Richards, A. (2013). Overlapping facial expression representations are identity-dependent. Vision Research, 79, 1–7.
  • Pessoa, L., & Adolphs, R. (2010). Emotion processing and the amygdala: From a “low road” to “many roads” of evaluating biological significance. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 773–783.
  • Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2128–2148.
  • Pourtois, G., Dan, E. S., Grandjean, D., Sander, D., & Vuilleumier, P. (2005). Enhanced extrastriate visual response to bandpass spatial frequency filtered fearful faces: Time course and topographic evoked-potentials mapping. Human Brain Mapping, 26, 65–79.
  • R Development Core Team (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.
  • Richards, A. (2004). The resolution of ambiguity and anxiety. In J. Yiend (Ed.), Cognition, emotion and psychopathology: Theoretical, empirical and clinical directions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Richards, A., Blanchette, I., & Munjiza, J. (2007). Contextual influences in the resolution of ambiguity in anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 879–890.
  • Richards, A., & French, C. C. (1992). An anxiety-related bias in semantic activation when processing threat/neutral homographs. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 45A, 503–525.
  • Richards, A., French, C. C., Calder, A. J., Webb, B., Fox, R., & Young, A. W. (2002). Anxiety-related bias in the classification of emotionally ambiguous facial expressions. Emotion, 2, 273–287.
  • Ritter, W., & Ruchkin, D. S. (1992). A review of event-related potential components discovered in the context of studying P3. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 658, 1–32.
  • Rossignol, M., Philippot, P., Crommelinck, M., & Campanella, S. (2008). Visual processing of emotional expressions in mixed anxious-depressed subclinical state: An event-related potential study on a female sample. Neurophysiologie Clinique, 38, 267–275.
  • Rossignol, M., Philippot, P., Douilliez, M., Crommelinck, M., & Campanella, S. (2005). The perception of fearful and happy facial expression is modulated by anxiety: An event-related potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 377, 115–120.
  • Schupp, H. T., Flaisch, T., Stockburger, J., & Junghöfer, M. (2006). Emotion and attention: Event-related brain potential studies. Understanding Emotions: Progress in Brain Research, 156, 31–51.
  • Schupp, H. T., Junghöfer, M., Weike, A. I., & Hamm, A. O. (2004). The selective processing of briefly presented affective pictures: An ERP analysis. Psychophysiology, 41, 441–449.
  • Schupp, H. T., Stockberger, J., Codispoti, M., Junghöfer, M., Weike, A. I., & Hamm, A. O. (2006). Stimulus novelty and emotion perception: The near absence of habituation in the visual cortex. NeuroReport, 17, 365–369.
  • Schutter, D. J. L. G., de Haan, E. H. F., & van Honk, J. (2004). Functionally dissociated aspects in anterior and posterior electrocortical processing of facial threat. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 53, 29–36.
  • Simmons, A., Matthews, S. C., Paulus, M. P., & Stein, M. B. (2008). Intolerance of uncertainty correlates with insula activation during affective ambiguity. Neuroscience Letters, 430, 92–97.
  • Spielberger, C. C., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  • Sprengelmeyer, R., Young, A. W., Sprenglemeyer, A., Calder, A. J., Rowland, D., Perrett, D., Holmberg, V., & Lange, H. (1997). Recognition of facial expressions: Selective impairment of specific emotions in Huntington’s disease. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 839–879.
  • Sqirlz 1.2 Landmark multi-morphing freeware. Retrieved 2009, from http://www.xiberpix.net/SqirlzMorph.html , xiberpix. Solihull, UK. Downloaded, 2009
  • Stopa, L., & Clark, D. M. (2000). Social phobia and interpretation of social events. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 273–283.
  • Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1972). Short homogenous versions of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191–193.
  • Taylor, J. C., Wiggett, A. J., & Downing, P. E. (2010). fMRI-adaptation studies of viewpoint tuning in the extrastraite and fusiform body areas. Journal of Neurophysiology, 103, 1467–1477.
  • Webster, M. A. (2011). Adaptation and visual coding. Journal of Vision. 11(5), 3, 1–23.
  • Webster, M. A., Kaping, D., Mizokami, Y., & Dohamel, P. (2004). Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature, 428, 557–561.
  • Weinberg, A., & Hajcak, G. (2010). The late positive potential predicts subsequent interference with target processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2994–3007.
  • Weinberg, A., Hilgard, J., Bartholow, B. D., & Hajcak, G. (2012). Emotional targets: Evaluative categorization as a function of context and content. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 84, 149–154.
  • Wilamowska, Z. A., Thompson-Hollands, J., Fairholme, C. P., Ellard, K. K., Farchione, T. J., & Barlow, D. H. (2010). Conceptual background, development, and preliminary data from the unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders. Depression & Anxiety, 27, 882–890.
  • Williams, L. M., Palmer, D., Liddell, B. J., Song, L., & Gordon, E. (2006). The “when” and “where” of perceiving signals of threat versus non-threat. NeuroImage, 31, 458–467.
  • Wisco, B., & Nolen-Hoeksema, A. (2010). Interpretation bias and depressive symptoms: The role of self-relevance. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 1113–1122.
  • Zhao, L., & Chubb, C. (2001). The size-tuning of the face-distortion after-effect. Vision Research, 41, 2979–2994.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.