2,887
Views
115
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Affective basis of judgment-behavior discrepancy in virtual experiences of moral dilemmas

, , , &
Pages 94-107 | Received 14 Aug 2013, Accepted 22 Nov 2013, Published online: 20 Dec 2013

REFERENCES

  • Avramova, Y. R., & Inbar, Y. (2013). Emotion and moral judgment. WIREs Cognitive Science, 4, 169–178.
  • Blascovich, J., Loomis, J., Beall, A., Swinth, K., Hoyt, C., & Bailenson, J. (2002). Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 103–124.
  • Christensen, J. F., & Gomila, A. (2012). Moral dilemmas in cognitive neuroscience of moral decision-making: A principled review. Neuroscience Biobehavioral Review, 36(4), 1249–1264.
  • Cushman, F. A. (2013). Action, outcome and value: A dual-system framework for morality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(3), 273–292.
  • Cushman, F. A., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Finding faults: How moral dilemmas illuminate cognitive structure. Social Neuroscience, 7(3–4), 269–279.
  • Cushman, F. A., Young, L., & Hauser, M. D. (2006). The role of reasoning and intuition in moral judgments: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1082–1089.
  • Dawson, M. E., Schell, A. M., & Filion, D. L. (2007). The electrodermal system. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 159–181). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • FeldmanHall, O., Mobbs, D., Evans, D., Hiscox, L., Navardy, L., & Dalgleish, T. (2012). What we say and what we do: The relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices. Cognition, 123, 434–441.
  • Figner, B., & Murphy, R. O. (2010). Using skin conductance in judgment and decision making research. In M. Schulte-Mecklenbeck, A. Kuehberger, & R. Ranyard (Eds.), A handbook of process tracing methods for decision research. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2007). Prospection: Experiencing the future. Science, 317(5843), 1351–1354.
  • Greene, J. D. (2009). The cognitive neuroscience of moral judgment. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences IV. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107, 1144–1154.
  • Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44, 389–400.
  • Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105–2108.
  • Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998–1002.
  • Hauser, M., Cushman, F., Young, L., Jin, R., & Mikhail, J. (2007). A dissociation between moral judgment and justification. Mind and Language, 22(1), 1–21.
  • Huebner, B., Dwyer, S., & Hauser, M. (2009). The role of emotion in moral psychology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 1–6.
  • Kant, I. (1785/2005). The moral law: Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
  • Kobayashi, N., Yoshino, A., Takahashi, Y., & Nomura, S. (2007). Autonomic arousal in cognitive conflict resolution. Autonomic Neuroscience, 132, 70–75.
  • Lombrozo, T. (2009). The role of moral commitments in moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 33, 273–286.
  • Mikahil, J. (2007). Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence, and the future. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11(4), 143–152.
  • Mill, J. S. (1863/1998). Utilitarianism. In R. Crisp (Ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychology, 38, 379–387.
  • Moretto, G., Làdavas, E., Mattioli, F., & di Pellegrino, G. (2009). A psychophysiological investigation of moral judgment after ventromedial prefrontal damage. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(8), 1888–1899.
  • Navarrete, C. D., McDonald, M., Mott, M., & Asher, B. (2012). Virtual morality: Emotion and action in a simulated 3-D “trolley problem”. Emotion, 12(2), 364–370.
  • Paxton, J. M., Ungar, L., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 36(1), 163–177.
  • Rovira, A., Swapp, D., Spanlang, B., & Slater, M. (2009). The use of virtual reality in the study of people’s responses to violent incidents. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 59.
  • Schwitzgebel, E., & Cushman, F. (2012). Expertise in moral reasoning? Order effects on moral judgment in professional philosophers and non-philosophers. Mind & Language, 27, 135–153.
  • Suter, R. S., & Hertwig, R. (2011). Time and moral judgment. Cognition, 119(3), 454–458.
  • Tassy, S., Oullier, O., Duclos, Y., Coulon, O., Mancini, J., Deruelle, C., … Wicker, B. (2012). Disrupting the right pre-frontal cortex alters moral judgment. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 282–288.
  • Tassy, S., Oullier, O., Mancini, J., & Wicker, B. (2013). Discrepancies between judgment and choice of action in moral dilemmas. Frontier Psychology, 4, 250.
  • Thomson, J. J. (1985). The trolley problem. Yale Law Journal, 94, 1395–1415.
  • Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. Psychological Science, 17(6), 476–477.
  • Waldmann, M. R., Nagel, J., & Wiegmann, A. (2012). Moral judgment. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 364–389). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.